Leaderboard

Thanks, everyone, the talk went really well thanks to your input!

By the way, our game lobby is one of the more family safe I know.

Concept of worker for 0ad, i try couple of other animations.

Well, the best way to react to trolls is to ignore them (and report them to the moderators ). If you give them attention they just will continue/increase their behaviour.

Nope, he's the tall one

I'd say for now focus on finishing the building. Props, in this case the worker, can be added later.

Even after this I havent problem with user, but is unfair... I let in your hands guys. I move the request to MP. Thanks Father, @feneur @scythetwirler

The best way to solve issues in the lobby is to talk to the moderators there, discussions are logged, so they can easily check that the report is true and take action.

This is good "hack" for the current behavior, but I must admit Bedouin's ideas are a lot better.

Not if they are regimental symbols though the civ symbol might show ownership and therefore differentiate it from defender's structures. Enjoy the Choice

@wowgetoffyourcellphone If you have a group of 20 chariots and you want to make sure those are not in the range of an tower the best thing you can do is adjust the direction. Furthermore you can put units into formations, such as skirmisher. However, formations are nearly unplayable, because you can not decide their direction. It is not necessary to have any in game bonus by adjusting the direction, it simply gives the human player more control. It is like the feature which allows you to assign groups of units to numbers from 0-9, you press the number and you get the group. This feature gives the human player more control.

I think the non-linear makes sense, but I think the linear makes it easier or players to underatand how much it costs and why it costs that much. Know what I mean, bromethues?