-
Who's Online 3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 116 Guests (See full list)
-
Latest updates
-
Newest Posts
-
By wowgetoffyourcellphone · Posted
Off the top of my head, I think the naval stuff is pretty standalone, so should be fine. -
Sorry wasn't clear. Point is you *can* check the compiler, but you have to account for a few ones And you *also* have to take the cpu architecture Risc v, power pc, i386, x64, elbrus2k, arm, aarch64 etc...
-
A presentation was given at a small french conference back in May, and work should resume during the summer Work has been done on the documentation that can be checked there.
-
By ShadowOfHassen · Posted
Any update on this? I know people are busy with their own life, but I'm excited! -
By real_tabasco_sauce · Posted
ah, makes sense. Oh, so there's no way to check the compiler? I guess that makes sense lol. That definitely throws a wrench in it. -
That's because you built in debug and not in release mode. You can't assume gcc sadly. There is also clang. Also maybe the intrisic you use isn't available on ARM.
-
Buenos días o tardes; -Para el símbolo de facción de Axum , había pensado en el León de Godebra ,con corona estilo etíope , con Axum escrito en Ge'ez ,dentro de una silueta en forma de estela de los reyes , todo como si fuera metal o tallado en piedra... ; ¿Qué pensáis? Disculpen las molestias*
-