Jump to content

Civ: Germans (Cimbri, Suebians, Goths)


 Share

Recommended Posts

Text about the wolf warriors.
 

Quote

Examining the etymology of the terms “berserker” and “ulfhednar” can provide further insight into their origins. The word “berserker” is derived from Old Norse “berserkr,” which is believed to mean “bear-shirt” or “bear-coat” (referring to the bear skins they wore). This etymology emphasizes the connection between the Berserker and the bear, both in terms of physical strength and the animalistic nature often attributed to these warriors.

Similarly, the term “ulfhednar” originates from Old Norse “úlfhéðinn,” which translates to “wolf-coat” or “wolf-hide.” This term clearly highlights the relationship between Ulfhednar and the wolves they emulated, further reinforcing the notion that these warriors channeled the spirit and ferocity of their respective animals in battle.


Seems like it could be possible that some ferocious German warriors in ancient times would dress themselves in wolf skins. Especially as a way to "summon" the strength of mythological or religious wolf totem. I don't think that the wolf skin would be very effective as a suit of armor, though.

Maybe add them as very brutal, very aggressive melee glass cannon shock troops?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Outis said:

It would be great if someone can make a version of the German buildings with round shields, then it can be potentially used in the Millenium AD mod. I would do myself but dont know how to...

|Do you need help? I can hep you, i would like to design buildings for Millenium A.D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

@Genava55 is it fine to have viking looking ships 1500 years ahead of time ? Also i think the game files still have their norse names karvi snekkja etc do we have other words for them ?

4 hours ago, Genava55 said:

This is what Europa Barbarorum did for the Suebi, they took inspiration from one of these bracteate to make a simpler version (top right):

image-48.thumb.png.ef4012294493d3170911f359b244f7f6.png

What's the license on this ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stan` said:

@Genava55 is it fine to have viking looking ships 1500 years ahead of time ? Also i think the game files still have their norse names karvi snekkja etc do we have other words for them ?

First, of which civ are we talking about? The Cimbri ? The Suebi ? The Germans ?

The oldest evidence we have for boats is obviously the Hjortspring boat (around 350 BC). But this is a more nimble boat, carrying approx. 20 men and without any sail.

csm_Tilia-collage_01_44031f8b50_38b553c672.png.5f2cda27e3cb30792a0a783edc64251a.png

The other major find is from the Roman (imperial) period, circa 320 AD, the Nydam ship. This is larger, for 30 men, but without sail as well.

153398_Nydam-Tveir-p-vandet.jpg.9be425be14005e08d70b8bf5942c14f4.jpg

The first evidence for a sort of longship with a sail could be Kvalsund II, but it is not certain, it is disputed. Anyway it is dated around 780 AD so clearly too late.

The first undisputed ship with sail and looking like a Viking ship is the Oseberg ship, circa 830 AD.

I looked what the literature says on the topic, it seems to be in agreement with the few I know:

Quote

The question of when the sail was adopted in the Norse homelands and how this affected the beginning of the earliest overseas voyages has been hotly debated. Some scholars support the idea that sails were used in Scandinavia long before the Viking Age, while a mid to late eighth-century date has been the generally accepted opinion (see Bill, Reference Bill and Klæsøe2010; Westerdal, Reference Westerdahl, Barrett and Gibbons2015: 18). One of the two vessels discovered at Salme in Estonia in 2008 and 2010, dates to around ad 750 and is the earliest evidence of a combined rowing/sailing vessel used by the Scandinavians (Price et al., Reference Price, Peets, Allmäe, Maldre and Oras2016). For Norway, the use of sail is not archaeologically attested before the Oseberg ship which was constructed in ad 820 (Bill, Reference Bill and Klæsøe2010: 27–28), although it is unlikely to have been the first sailing vessel in Norwegian waters. Nevertheless, the introduction of the sail and developments in shipbuilding technology during the Viking Age in this setting should be regarded as improvements and adaptions in response to new uses rather than the result of revolutionary inventions (Barrett, Reference Barrett, Anderson, Barrett and Boyle2010: 290).

Source: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-archaeology/article/earliest-wave-of-viking-activity-the-norwegian-evidence-revisited/C2A3AB5F0C962CFB700EEAF24970BE49

1 hour ago, Stan` said:

What's the license on this ?

Not compatible with 0AD. The EB team requires the explicit permission for each asset and for each use. It is not open source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, real_tabasco_sauce said:

The wikipedia article has a petroglyph with a ship seemingly much larger than the others.

Probably longer, but as nimble, versions of this boat existed too. Maybe you can use two sizes of the same boat type.

7 minutes ago, real_tabasco_sauce said:

also, the merchant ship is a bit big :D

Yeah the merchant ships are probably too large.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...