Jump to content

Closing Old Issues


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, ShadowOfHassen said:

Oh, that's a good idea. I'll put the reason I close the issue in the issue itself so we have it. I may also compile some of the bigger/ cooler issues here for people if they want to pick up

If you’ll make a list of the non engine related ones, I’ll maybe take a look and see if there’s anything I could work on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Perzival12 said:

If you’ll make a list of the non engine related ones, I’ll maybe take a look and see if there’s anything I could work on.

I'll see what there is. If you can animate / model there are a LOT of animal models that are 90% done and then can be added to the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ShadowOfHassen said:

I'll see what there is. If you can animate / model there are a LOT of animal models that are 90% done and then can be added to the game.

I can animate and do a bit of modeling, but I'm a novice (most of my models are made by chopping and screwing other models together).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Perzival12 said:

I can animate and do a bit of modeling, but I'm a novice (most of my models are made by chopping and screwing other models together).

If you want you can try to finish some of the 70% done new animals

here are a few

https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/issues/1983

https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/issues/1993

https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/issues/2003

there's most of the info in the forum post that the issue links to.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I am catching up with a long backlog of unread stuff from a couple months of absence, so I am seeing the excellent housekeeping work you folks have been performing on the issues. Great job and thanks! (y) 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

@ShadowOfHassen your concerns are quite relevant. There's a lot to be closed from those 1.6k issues, and for the rest, to be discussed. I'd start from the older ones and start either closing them (they can be reopened if really needed, this is how things are done in my experience in other fields) or classifying them, but we would need to agree on categories and have discussions for where to move them around. We could have a thread with the first post containing the gitea links among these categories being constantly edited, along a decision tree explaining the process. In the example below, most things would go to "Arguable", if it doesn't have much support or it's too game-breaking, goes to "Unlikely", and if most disagree to implement it, it's closed, while if people agree it should be eventually implemented, it would go to either "Easy" or "Difficult", depending on the work it would take to do so (then there could be sub categories regarding "Animation", "Engine", whatever, for those interested, to find things more easily). Maybe "Accepted" and "Underway" could also be useful.

Gemini_Generated_Image_72vge172vge172vg.thumb.jpg.16f06bda3813d4d383e32f57ed8fc4d2.jpg

Edited by Thalatta
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/07/2026 at 8:42 PM, ShadowOfHassen said:

If nobody objects I propose we make a project for orphaned issues with patches and existing work, that I can put them all in, so people can find them (and maybe eventually pick up). I can also close them if we want.

Have you done this at the end? Maybe it would fit with something like what I just proposed.

 

On 24/12/2025 at 5:11 PM, ShadowOfHassen said:

True, but they dont exactly serve a purpose either as someone will open a new issue.

I agree https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/issues/5672 should be closed. It makes no sense to have Issues stating that maybe there's a problem, many versions past, reported by one person 7 years ago, when just "reinstallation might help" but there was no follow up. If there's still a problem someone will open an Issue again (or better, reopen that one).

 

On 24/12/2025 at 2:50 PM, ShadowOfHassen said:

For example, here's one that suggests that lower health units could move slower. It's an interesting idea, but one I'm not exactly sure is one that 0 A.D. is ever going to have.

https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/issues/2091

I don't see why that would be the case, it could be implemented not substantially changing present gameplay, as remarked at the end:

On 03/08/2026 at 7:23 PM, Obelix said:

See

 

On 25/12/2025 at 1:35 PM, Stan` said:

Have the sound files been retrieved? Would be a shame not to get this out of the way if "even a non-technical user could get it done in less than an hour".

Edited by Thalatta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...