fatherbushido
-
Posts
1.148 -
Joined
-
Days Won
4
Posts posted by fatherbushido
-
-
It's the height added to the terrain height.
-
@sarcoma Thanks for you reply! I know those things (knowing that part of the code and playing that game). I quote you because you was the only one to have pointed the 3 elements (sorry if I repeat):
- A: requires no skill
- B: makes dancing unit immortal
- C: enemy army focuses on it
And the remaining questions is what is the problematic part (A, B or C?) or which combination of them?
To be more precise, for example, is B alone problematic?
(I have my personal answers, but I'd like that people complaining about that can (have the tools to) properly define their problem.)
(Some months ago I had already looked at that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3j-WQc0AWA (ignore that the soldiers don't react to the cav).)
(promotion cheering animation is another issue and only a matter of taste finally.)
-
Can someone which see that as a problem define me the problem?
For example, here (the best summary quote I find in that topic):
On 2/17/2019 at 3:59 AM, sarcoma said:This is dancing, requires no skill and makes dancing unit immortal and enemy army focuses on it:
I see 3 issue:
- A: requires no skill
- B: makes dancing unit immortal
- C: enemy army focuses on it
Which one is the problem (or which combination is a problem)?
(I have my personal answers to that but I'd like to hear yours - defining a problem usually come before solving it.)
-
1
-
-
Thanks @wowgetoffyourcellphone!
All the one you posted are done by you and cc-by-sa licensed, that's it? -
Thanks @Sundiata for saying it!
(for a long time, the only relevant answer I had to proposed to that issue was "42")
-
1
-
-
On 2/13/2019 at 10:04 AM, Nescio said:
Currently the poll's 10–4; more opinions are welcome!
My taste is no territory root for fortress.
CC must be the key of the thing (we are already far of the initial territory design).
Fortress is something important as an outpost but it can't survive itself (but you can keep it when garrisoned).
Though finally what are we voting for, everybody can just add two lines in their own mod
-
21 hours ago, Sundiata said:
Hmm, but the "default garrison" is an abstraction that isn't explicitly mentioned anywhere, is it?
To be more accurate, it's not a default garrison, it's default arrows (excuse me for my english).
It's for example written in the tooltip of those structures (towers, fortress, cc, ...) and you can set up that in the BuildingAI entry of the related templates.
-
-
You can look at Delenda Est mod for example.
-
On 1/11/2019 at 5:06 PM, Stockfish said:
@stanislas69 ,when will be the game in beta version?
It is: a23b
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said:
So, instead of making the counters simpler and more "intuitive" they were removed almost completely...
I don't want to diverge from the main topic, but you obviously know that they were removed to let place for stats. But happens what it happens: nothing (from the gameplay features point of view). Was that too early? Was there a failure? I guess it's not my problem nor yours ;-)
-
1
-
-
48 minutes ago, av93 said:
have you considered to change hack/pierce/crush to melee/ranged/siege attack? Maybe it's easier to design and balance this way
That doesn't even make sense to have those 3 stats with hard counters. Only 1 stat is needed.
-
2
-
-
@7yl4r: the wiki is a bit outdated.
-
(
On 1/18/2019 at 3:05 AM, l2edVipel2 said:1) Counters are finally implemented.
They are implemented since 2011.
They were even massively used in 10 wfg released alpha between 2011 and 2014 (from a7 to a16).
)
-
18 minutes ago, ffffffff said:
Why the name @fatherbushido
It's over 9000.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Since our announcement was shared in a few places among them the Wildfire Games Forums a few questions were asked. It is time to answer some of them.
Project name
No, the final project name will be Fork AD 9001.
Project goals
We still adhere to the old ideals of doing things properly. That means we first have to fix some code rot so there is a nice foundation to build on. Do note that this does not mean that there are no improvements upon already sound bases. While we intend to improve all aspects of the game, our current focus is on mod support and single player improvements.
Different culture
How we differ is in that we actually discuss things when discussion is needed, and ask for each others feedback. As opposed to a culture that makes one think of the quote "What we've got here is failure to communicate". Though we apparently caused quite a surge in WFG team communications with our announcement, you're welcome.
Private source
Yes, the repo is currently not public. Select individuals might be given access if it seems worth it however.
Contributing to 0 A.D.
We think some people might want to read the initial announcement again if it wasn't clear enough. Everyone is free to do with our released code what the license allows them to do. But that is where us contributing to 0 A.D. ends. Last we checked trying to interact with them did not lead to any useful result, and talking to walls is not the best use of our time. We do wish them luck with getting Alpha 23 released in a state that is worth calling a release. Something else that might be worth reading are the words of the most active contributor that is left "Secondly the capable motivated and available developers went down"source.
And since we want to let people make up their own mind we do include some statistics, that might be skewed by a few factors. Among them are people committing patches by others, people doing reviews of others' code instead of committing things, and more. And not even all of us kept contributing through that full date range, but without further ado:
git shortlog -sn --since='2017-01-01' --until='2017-12-31' 618 elexis 248 autobuild 228 mimo 147 fatherbushido 80 Imarok 59 leper 49 bb 48 Stan 46 Itms 30 wraitii 14 LordGood 14 Pureon 14 s0600204 13 enrique 9 vladislavbelov 6 FeXoR 3 gallaecio 3 scythetwirler 2 omriDespite our reservations against what is left of the team, we do appreciate them allowing part of this discussion to happen on their forums.
As always we are open to questions and if you want to have your questions answered immediately, then you know where to find us.
Kind regards,
fatherbushido, leper and mimo.-
4
-
-
Greetings!
As some of you might have noticed development has nearly come to a halt a while ago. This was not only caused by issues around the initial attempt at releasing Alpha 23, but also regarding how development was done, and a certain number of internal conflicts. A few people were not quite happy with where the development was going, or how the team "interacted" with each other. A long time ago the team at least had each other's backs in cases of conflict. Apparently this ceased to be the case a while ago.
You might now wonder why this sad story above is the start of this communication. Well, some of us decided that we were not happy with this, and after each and every one of us stopped considering the current team in this state to be good steersmen we decided to give the whole community an alternative.
Please let us introduce you to Fork AD.
The amount of changes that have been made to the code since we forked is greater in number than the amount of changes to WFG's SVN repo since May. That may not sound like a lot, until you consider that we've been at this for less than a month, and WFG allegedly has a lot more active members.
Now we know you've been craving to know some details of what we've changed so far. Apart from fixing some glaring bugs in the code that were even pointed out to WFG when they were noticed, we are updating a lot of things so we don't place users of our code at risk. There also is a lot better Single Player support, though one could blame that on most of said code effectively being unmaintained, better mod support, improved development tools, a bunch of housekeeping that was needed, and more.
If you now ask yourself when and where you can download Fork AD, we still have to defer you to a later point. We will release for all supported platforms, which are still Linux, macOS, Windows, and BSDs, once we are confident that we are releasing something that fullfills your expectations, and is something we can be proud of.
Although the progress has already been substantial, we are always open for reinforcement, either from new people or from those disappointed or demotivated by the WFG direction. Artists in particular are very welcomed.
As said before, the state of that fork is not yet publicly available, but all information will be given on our website when available.
Meanwhile, you can reach us at https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=forkad
Kind regards,
fatherbushido, leper and mimo.-
4
-
2
-
6
-
-
4 minutes ago, Imperator Ferrum Princeps I said:
You even got the units to be able to run by double right clicking!
0ad had it before January 2010 :-)
-
4
-
-
U+1F648 U+1F649 U+1F64A
-
Thanks for the announcement. @leper
Btw you just rick rolled me.
-
On 6/18/2018 at 9:09 AM, wowgetoffyourcellphone said:
When I mean capturing animals, I mean the simple way in AOK, where if one of your units came within a minimum range of the animal, it would switch to your side (with a short "cowbell" sound effect, one strike). Converting units with Priests and such, ("Wololo") is much different. I think the problem lies in terminology.
something like that? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLy87AhIXak
(infra low vid quality)
The design I used at the time I did that is the following:
There is a convertable units with a Convertable component.
Convertable component has:
- ConverterClasses
- ProtecterClasses
- Delay
- Range
A unit is converted (change ownership or even change template) when it has a unit of the 'converter' class but no unit of the 'protecter' class during a said 'delay' in a said 'range'.
(Obviously the range and the delay are tweakable by auras. So we can have a hero with instant conversion and things like that).
-
1
-
-
It's when the packable unit is deleted/destroyed/packed/unpacked while being targeted by a global aura.
With the ad hoc check in StatusBars component it shouldn't happen.
edit: it seems I miss something somewhere. What are the customed components in that mod?
-
-
I meant it's not always the case ;-)
-
1
-
some little suggestions
in Gameplay Discussion
Posted
@lecedar: there were a long time ago (last decade?) many discussions about realistic ship vs unit scale or not. The main issues are that maps are a bit too small and that ship needs their own way to mange motion (and perhaps pathfinding) - but that refers to the programming part.