-
Posts
11.179 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
570
Everything posted by wowgetoffyourcellphone
-
Tunnelers and sappers discussion?
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to LordGood's topic in Gameplay Discussion
That could be the Sparabara formation for Persians. -
I know it looks better. Just saying gameplay would not change much by orientation.
-
Map previews - how to generate?
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to jonbaer's topic in Tutorials, references and art help
I think 45 degree angle would be good. Also, for fog, I think some previews need the fog if fog in the map is a prominent visual feature (like for a Jungle map or Snowy map or a British map ). So many fog can be reduce by some set percentage that you deem is good. -
This would be good idea if the game had directional attack and turn times and directional vision (all things that could be added, along with battalion), but the game currently has not these things so the direction they face is (currently) irrelevant.
-
Crowd-Sourced Civ: Ptolemaic Egyptians (Ptolemies)
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to Mythos_Ruler's topic in Official tasks
-
Crowd-Sourced Civ: Ptolemaic Egyptians (Ptolemies)
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to Mythos_Ruler's topic in Official tasks
IIRC both the cavalry arm of the Agema and the infantry arm of the Agema were both called "Royal Guards" or "Royal Agema." So, Royal Guard Cavalry and Royal Guard Infantry (or Pikeman) seems most accurately. -
http://www.realmofhistory.com/2016/05/10/animated-evolution-roman-battle-tactics/ This use a screenshot. lol. Anyone else find 0 A.D. in articles or websites like this?
-
Hmm, the line in his helmet make him look transparent.
-
Map previews - how to generate?
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to jonbaer's topic in Tutorials, references and art help
Manual, with zoom out in Atlas. -
Tunnelers and sappers discussion?
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to LordGood's topic in Gameplay Discussion
-
Tunnelers and sappers discussion?
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to LordGood's topic in Gameplay Discussion
No use in the game "capturing" a tunnel. Jus detsry the shack and the tunneling units inside die. -
Crowd-Sourced Civ: Ptolemaic Egyptians (Ptolemies)
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to Mythos_Ruler's topic in Official tasks
I give the Ptolemies a champion pike infantry (Agema Pikeman) in DE. Public should do the same. -
Nice. I miss real siege stuff like mantelet and undermine tunnel in the game.
-
feneur is right. Plus extra time give me extra time to replace some icons with fresh ones.
-
===[COMMITTED]=== Ptolemaic library
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to Tomcelmare's topic in Completed Art Tasks
This could have been committed by now, looking at how long the release time has been... -
I actually printed a 0AD disc today
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to Dekay's topic in Art Development
Haha I meant did you put music or the game? -
Major Changes and Features of Delenda Est
wowgetoffyourcellphone replied to wowgetoffyourcellphone's topic in Delenda Est
Any other ideas for to use the Upgrade feature? I was thinking of giving every champion infantry unit a Banner Carrier upgrade option that boosts the performance of units around them (does not stack, so sprinkle them around). They'd have no attack, but very good armor or health. Definitely an Immortals Spear <-> Bow option. Any others? I thought about a Hastatus Sword <-> Pilum toggle, but I think the Pilum should be use differently in the game (throw pilum more like a "first attack" option if the enemy is right distance, then charge with the sword). But I might include in Alpha 21 for fun anyway. Some of these will be made obsolete later with proper secondary attacks implement, but that's okay. And in case I don't like the way secondary atack implement then I can always use the upgrade feature. This is one of the best feature impemented in a long time. -
Maybe portrait? This stuff look cool:
