Leaderboard

1.- Then what would be the difference between a civlized minifaction and a normal faction? 2.- You would have to program the AI to decide when is convenient to pack or unpack a certain building and where to place it again. 3.- The same than 1 but without diplomacy What about american conquest, they had 1 building an an army around the building, you could destroy them or occupy their building and start creating specific units of that building. Just that instead of 1 building is a town with some eyecandy it can be predefined towns and a main building that you have to occupy in order to have access to that units, you have to defeat the guarding army before.

Try the svn version just follow the build instructions on the wiki that way you will have the latest code and art,do not install just run it in user land(your home dir) not in system land(installed) that way it is much easier to edit as you do not change any system files that need root privileges to modify. Enjoy the Choice

Convertion? Is planned feature, but is barely discussed how should work.

I realized i forgot the fence around the top, though I don't know what it would have looked like back then as it has also been replaced. Perhaps there is some existing art assets which can be copied? At least for now, I'm leaving this as it is. Feel free to modify it

I don't want this thread moved to Off-topic, because it has some importent information in it. So, let's just agree to disagree and leave it at that.

Generic Name: Italian Allied Cavalry.Specific Name: Eques Socius.Class: Cavalry Javelinist.Ranged Armament: Javelin. Gladius (ornamental).Appearance:Garb:Basic – . Advanced – . Elite – . Helmet:Basic – . Advanced – . Elite – . Shield:Basic – . Advanced – . Elite – . Figure(s): -Mount:Basic – . Advanced – . Elite – . History: Rome's Italian allies frequently supplied Rome's armies with light cavalry, an arm in which Rome was often deficient. After the Social War concluded, all Italy became Roman citizens and thus could enroll into Roman army units. Upon the Marian Reforms, the role of the Italian allied cavalry was given to auxiliary units of Thracians, Numidians, Gauls and Germans.Garrison: 2.Function: -Special: -

Now comes the list of Sassanid Army: 1. Infantry Infantry (Payg) Archer (Kamandar-e Eransahr) Dismounted cavalry (Arteshtar-i Payahdag) Kurdish tribesman 2. Cavalry Sassanid Cataphract (Aswaran-e Eransahr) Clibanarii (Grivpanvar) Sakastan cavalry (Aswaran-e Sakasahr) 3. Champion unit Zayedan (Royal Household Cavalry) Gilani Warrior (Arteshstar-i Gelanig) Royal Household Archers (Kamandar-e Zayedan) War Elephant 4. Siege Onager (Falakan-e Majaniq) Scorpion Battering Ram Siege Tower Ballista 5. Navy Omani War Vessel 6. Heroes Ardashir I Shapur I Shapur II Bahram V (Gur)

Parthian do not use war elephants except for display of power during the reign of Vologases I. Other option like siege ladders could be a good option, while units like Hyrcanian Hillmen which i proposed was armed with axes which means they could destroy wooden palisade and gates thus solving the lack of siege gear problem, unfortunately the only disadvantage of these tribal warrior is that they have low HP and armor.

Parthian never have a navy for they barely control these area. This map will show why: The coastal area which is under control of Elymais, Persis and the Indo Parthian. The former (Elymais, Persis) enjoys a high degree of autonomy while the latter (Indo Parthian) have declare independence from the Parthian central authority and later destroyed by the Kushan Empire. As the Parthian have no control over the coastal area, their navy was a blank. Later they manage to control parts of Arab coast but due to weak imperial authority and wars against Roman Empire, they barely have the resources to raise a navy thus making Parthian navy absent from Parthian history.

obviusly, take easy, we try to use more accurate than that Hollywood source boys.

roman shields? no you not have idea, even put mars symbol, or SPQR, or other than a simple Roman shield even the design is not enought

Don't erase the Aquila concept Rome without eagles is like Macedon without Sun Symbol. If I have time to Design I draw something for illustrator and I'll put effects in Photoshop but, I'm very busy working in a ONG. PD:I'm Romanophile.

I would include "native" or "mini-factions" as post-release free DLC (probably as part of our post-release patches, to sweeten the deal). And then I would only use them in scenarios and skirmish maps, so that they can be used judiciously and uniquely by the designer. I'd rather they be a "special" feature of some maps rather than something that's used all of the time in random maps and whatnot. They could also be useful in campaigns. To make sure they are actually implemented, it is best to think of ways to include them without much extra programming. Try to think of things that we are going to include anyway, then just build on those. For instance, best to think of a way to use the planned 'capture' feature and integrate that into your plans instead of coming up with a whole-new way of doing things. This way, your pet feature (in this instance, mini-factions) is easier to implement, making it more likely to be implemented. Just my advice.

Ptolemaic (smaller, unarmoured) and Seleucid (armoured) war elephants.