In all honestly, I couldn't give less darns. That doesn't give you any authority or veto over matters of historical fact, so, instead of fallaciously waving insignificant pseudo-credentials, a reliable source or two is what would do it. Otherwise, I couldn't care less if you, or anyone here, have been around since the Big Bang. I'm not making assumptions beyond what's said. It's clear that you "did it with AI", that it will struggle with "Iranian boots in 3rd century", that they are "sketches or approximations", and that you don't necessarily say "this is 100% historical", so there will be mistakes, hopefully pointed out in the discussion you yourself said could happen, so, again, re-read your whole reaction to me just doing that.

Don't make assumptions I didn't make. I even clearly stated that I did it with AI.You must assume that it is not 100% because if you correct one part of the drawing, it will ruin another.

How well does it run? Have you tried a lot of players or units and structures?

You see, that's more useful and less sterile. I remind you that I am the one who has been working as a contributor here for some time.You, on the other hand, do not. Apart from you and a few other experts, nobody is going to read an entire book just to make boots for a 3D character( low poly and low definition quality). I am tolerating your criticism, what I am not tolerating is that you are presuming my intention. You think AI is going to know about Iranian boots in 3rd century? I'm telling you that AI doesn't know what a  helmet is.   You'll get stressed, but most artists don't represent history, especially those who work in Hollywood as it's believed to be. You should take things made with AI as sketches or approximations. What we artists do are sketches and approximations that a third party gave us. And one thing that bothers me is that you think or say that I'm saying: this is 100% historical, do it this way.

And from what I see, @Anaxandridas ho Skandiates left, and you are still here, so...   I'm not saying that, but if you just dismiss or demean whoever points out something from an AI image, don't rant if you get called out. You are wrong if you think I'll just idly sit and take your BS. Do the smart thing and either provide clear evidence or just say "I don't have any, so that part of the AI image has to be ignored by whoever does the models". And, again, that's simply the end of it. Multi-post whining from you is truly not needed.