Ah, I see, you're probably referring to Geneva55's comment. I don't see him expressing himself the way you did. The way you say things and your track record in the project matter. There may be more, I'm not going to spend time rereading old posts. But if you want to go to the trouble of quoting every message, go ahead. It's one of your specialties.     Ah so you are pointing fingers afterall, or not? As for the StarCraft II example, I really don't think 0 A.D. is faster. I understand why you're using training and research times as a reference, but a game's pacing is determined by many other factors as well. But at that point, it's a matter of personal opinion. I've already tried to convince you that it's not a good argument, but you still think it is. That's fair.   LOL You are amazing, mate. Amazing

Maybe I should have mentioned that it refers to the 4th issue mentioned in   

I'm not blaming APM, I do agree it's not as high as in other games, not thanks to short training times obviously, but to other things like batch training (which is a great idea), maybe the lack of unit abilities (which might be coming in the future), whatever. I'm only saying that for newbies that are not used to batching and train units one by one things can feel rushed, and it's just an entry point issue that worries me.

Hello everyone We are working on R29. Thus we need a codename starting with "C". The suggestions I found in an other thread are: Calcharo Camellya Canaan Cantarella Carlotta Caryatid Ciaccona Please recommend more names.

Gosh, seriously? Have you read or not the first page of that thread? I don't want to make a whole paragraph with quotes from that thread, so don't make me do it! I'm not even referring to the "lobby", or to the "competitive community" (as referred there), but those who want "a rushed game that's 3 times faster than the already competitive StarCraft II (production and research times as reference)". I'm quite clear on the actual issue, and not singling out a group of people that might not have all that same idea. And even if I were doing that (which I'm not), why do you treat me as if that's not happening in that thread? And if I did it by "poor wording" at any other possible time (which I don't remember right now, but just in case), it's beyond clear what I am referring to. So, how can you possibly still think any of that?? Why don't you just read way more carefully?