Not really, Robert Beekes in his Etymological Dictionary of Greek (2010) states that this interpretation "has now been abandoned, because such lengthened grade formations cannot be accounted for in PIE terms. Thus, the word remains unexplained". Besides, κώμη doesn't translate preferentially as home and house, so no inconsistencies there.   Not my point, but that þurpą not meaning village could have been, although I don’t think much can be said about that, since it only appears once.   Then you say (or repeat) that, because Lehmann point rests entierly on his incorrect ordering of ON and OE, and, again, from the ON incorrect meaning he states.   Not true (if you keep referring to it as a single farm), þurpą appears only once in Gothic, and, yet again, ON states the opposite, why dismiss my ON dictionary quote?:   So, your whole argument seems to rest on two quite weak points: 1. For Gothic, þaurp appears only once, thus not much can be really concluded. Haimaz appears multiple times as village and at least once as country, and wīhsą at least 6 times as village and at least 4 times as country. The country/countryside/farmlands discussion is totally irrelevant and not even the point (for a change). It’s not about farmland/country, but about how rural they are with respect to villages. I don’t care about wīhsą, the point is that you can’t rely just on Gothic, otherwise wīhsą would seem even more rural than haimaz, according to your own criteria and opposite of your own proposal. 2. The next attested instance of a þurpą cognate is in 725 OE, meaning village. Later on in OE and OHG it kept being used for “hamlet, village, farm, or estate”. For OHG, any spurious dictionary shift right in the 8th century cannot be just extrapolated back a thousand years supposedly unchanged. Heim being an older ending doesn’t mean it didn’t also mean all the other things every source states it meant, nor does it imply that the ancestor of dorf was an individual farm because it wasn’t used earlier as a place ending, as the multiple sources I’ve mentioned previously clearly state (just quoted one yet again explicitly stating how it was originally applied, and its etymological sense). Thus, sources show that haimaz was used in many different ways, while þurpą and wīhsą were more similar between them. And it’s clear already that Germanic hamlets were a bunch of cottages, farmsteads, estates, whatever one wants to call them, nitpicking on this point is a useless byzantine discussion. Those who put together the Proto-Germanic dictionary knew their sources, including (especially) the Gothic Bible, and heim/dorf/whatever endings. You have to explain why you think they didn’t.

I've only recently started exploring pokies sites australia, but it's been fun so far. I'm still learning the ropes, so if anyone has tips for a newbie, I'm all ears! What should I be looking out for?

I never seen this before. It might be worth to test it

That's what I do, and some of my farmers ended chopping wood. @wowgetoffyourcellphone, I don't think it's because of the rally point, because most of my farmers continued farming, while just some ended chopping wood, and had to put them on farms again. Seems something weird is going on.

You could do that although from a practical point of view I think it makes a littler less sense.  If you research a technology, wont every unit that does that particular chore want to use the newest technology? Or you could do each phase (as game progress) soldiers gather rate reduces.  I think this might be a little more practical, as they become more accustomed to fighting their will to work as laborers decreases?