All Activity

Buenos días ,tarde o noches; - @Genava55 ¿Podría confirmarme la existencia de los siguientes edificios aparecidos en el siguiente video durante el periodo 500-1 a.C en india?Es para crear las facciones ;"Satavahana" y "Kalinga" Edificios culturales posibles; Arena de combate/palestra---------(Akhada ) Academia---------------------------(gurukúl) Hospital-----------------------------(¿Śrīārogyavihāra?/ Arogyaviharas) Teatro------------------------------(rangamancha ) librería gubernamental--------------(Akshapatala) Asamblea---------------------------(Ganasanghas ) Baño público/stepwell---------------( Baori ) Escuela-----------------------------(Pathshalas)/Ashram Hipódromo--------------------------(ratha-yuddha) - @Genava55 ¿Sabe si también tuvieron camellos de guerra en la antigua india a.C ? Disculpen las molestias*

@wowgetoffyourcellphone Careful, you might actually make me like AI.

You might want to try updating sdl as handling shift + mouse button 4 / 5 (wheel) works just fine here (not a mac)

Merged the other thread.

IIRC it's broken for me as well. I think we're not handling something properly. Would need some debugging.

Combat formations would have cavalry on the sides, as mentioned by @LienRag. Archers in the rear and melee infantry in the front/center.

commands.txt @user1 This is a report regarding the player “Malavita” My lobby name is "ittihat_ve_terakki" He joined a 1v1 game that I was hosting. The game started normally, but when he realized he was about to lose, he began insulting me and behaving in a toxic manner. The game was actually unrated, but instead of resigning properly, he quit the match. He also accused me of choosing the map unfairly, even though he accepted the map at the start and raised no objections until he was losing. I am reporting this behavior as it is unsportsmanlike and disruptive.

Don't know what the general opinion is, but I could see the current terminology change...

replacement of feminization, since we now use civilians instead of women/female citizens. I suppose we could flip the number and call it militarization. Or just percent civilians.

What's Civilianization? E.g. 38%.

help!

This fortress is my favorite. Its so cool.

The logic of having cavalry in the back is to allow it to move through the sides. The problem of having it in the front is that you don't want to send your cavalry first into a spearmen shield wall (which is the dominant historical form). Move formation ("column" in napoleonian warfare) should have cavalry in the front but combat formation ("line") have it in the back. Except for specific formations, of course.

Buenos días o tardes; -Así se ven en el juego las facciones europeas; (Sólo faltan los íberos y Siracusa ya que recibieron una actualización ,en unos días subiré las fotos) ¿Qué otras facciones les gustarían que fueran incluidas en la segunda versión del mod? Europa (12) Bósforo Dacios Delmatae/Dálmatas Épiro íberos (faltan) ilirios (proprie dicti) Lusitanos Sármatas (nómadas) Siracusa (faltan) Suevos Tracios Urálicos (nómadas) Bósforo Dacios Delmatae/Dálmatas Épiro íberos (faltan) ilirios (proprie dicti) Lusitanos Sármatas (nómadas) Siracusa (faltan) Suevos Tracios Urálicos (nómadas) Disculpen las molestias*

https://www.karwansaraypublishers.com/blogs/gary-brueggemans-the-roman-army-ancient-warfare/the-march-basics https://www.karwansaraypublishers.com/blogs/gary-brueggemans-the-roman-army-ancient-warfare/march-the-legion-components https://www.karwansaraypublishers.com/blogs/gary-brueggemans-the-roman-army-ancient-warfare/march-noncombatants-and-legion-baggage https://www.karwansaraypublishers.com/blogs/gary-brueggemans-the-roman-army-ancient-warfare/march-the-whole-army https://www.karwansaraypublishers.com/blogs/gary-brueggemans-the-roman-army-ancient-warfare/the-order-of-march https://www.karwansaraypublishers.com/blogs/gary-brueggemans-the-roman-army-ancient-warfare/attacking-the-marching-column