Genava55 Posted September 28, 2020 Report Share Posted September 28, 2020 http://groznijat.tripod.com/thrac/index.html https://tied.verbix.com/project/glossary/thra.html https://www.academia.edu/25248385/Studies_in_Thracian_vocabulary_I_VII_ https://sci-hub.st/downloads/2020-01-07/41/sotiroff1963.pdf#view=FitH zibythides for nobles, suras for warrior etc. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 28, 2020 Report Share Posted September 28, 2020 2 hours ago, Genava55 said: http://groznijat.tripod.com/thrac/index.html https://tied.verbix.com/project/glossary/thra.html https://www.academia.edu/25248385/Studies_in_Thracian_vocabulary_I_VII_ https://sci-hub.st/downloads/2020-01-07/41/sotiroff1963.pdf#view=FitH zibythides for nobles, suras for warrior etc. Buenas @Genava55; Estas fuentes son muy interesantes , voy a usarlas para las traducciones y en unos días tendré casi todo . También e visto sus referencias a la arquitectura y haré bocetos . ya que creo que hay suficientes referencias para crear a las unidades . Ideas; Posible símbolo; ideas para las unidades ; Unidades ;(28) Infantería ;(5) (Reclutados en ;"cuarteles") 1.Lancero;---------------------------------------------------------( ) 2.Escaramuzador;-------------------------------------------------( ) 3.Espadachín;-----------------------------------------------------( ) 4.Arquero ;---------------------------------------------------------( ) 5.Guerrero con hacha;--------------------------------------------( ) (Reclutados en ;"cuarteles "y "centro urbano") 1.Lancero;----------------------------------------------------------( ) 2.Escaramuzador;-------------------------------------------------( ) *posibilidad que toda la infantería menos arquero , tenga dos armas , la X y las javalinas. y los escaramuzadores , las javalinas y una espada corta. Infantería campeona;(1) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Campeón tracio;-----------------------------------------------( ) Infantería mercenaria ;(2) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Mercenario dacio(genérico);--------------------------------( ) 2.Mercenario ilirio(genérico);---------------------------------( ) Infantería campeona mercenaria;(1) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Mercenario Hoplita griego ;----------------------------------( ) Caballería;(2) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Caballería ligera (con hacha , espada...);-------------------( ) 2.Escaramuzador a caballo;-------------------------------------( ) (Reclutados en ;" "y "centro urbano") 1.Caballería ligera (con hacha , espada...);-------------------( ) Caballería de élite;(2) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1. Jinete campeón ;-----------------------------------------( ) 2. Jinete escaramuzador campeón;----------------------( ) Caballería mercenaria (no de élite);(2) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Caballería griega (con lanza);----------------------------( ) 2.Caballería celta;-------------------------------------------( ) Caballería mercenaria de élite;(1) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Caballería escita (con arco) ;-------------------------------( ) Civiles;(3) (Reclutados en ;" centro urbano") 1. Mujer;------------------------------------------------------------( ) (Reclutados en ;"Mercado ") 2. Comerciante;----------------------------------------------------( ) (Reclutados en ;"Templo ") 3. Sacerdote;-------------------------------------------------------( ) Armas de asedio;(1) (Reclutados en ;" fortaleza") 1.Ariete;--------------------------------------------------------------( ) Arma de asedio mercenaria ;(1) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Catapulta macedonia ;----------------------------------------( ) Navíos ;(3) (Reclutados en ;" Puerto") 1.Balsa pesquera;----------------------------------------------------( ) 2.Navío mercante;---------------------------------------------------( ) 3.Navío militar ;------------------------------------------------------( ) Navíos mercenario;(1) (Reclutados en ;" Puerto") 1.Navío militar griego;-----------------------------------------------( ) Héroes ;(3) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1." ";-------------------------------------() 2." ";-------------------------------------() 3." ";-------------------------------------() 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted September 28, 2020 Report Share Posted September 28, 2020 44 minutes ago, Duileoga said: Estas fuentes son muy interesantes , voy a usarlas para las traducciones y en unos días tendré casi todo . También e visto sus referencias a la arquitectura y haré bocetos . ya que creo que hay suficientes referencias para crear a las unidades . Your welcome and thank you for taking the time for it. I think the biggest issue is finding a proper style and design for the buildings. Since the Thracians of the Odrysian kingdom were heavily Hellenized, I don't think a wooden design is suitable. Maybe something with more stones, even for the houses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 28, 2020 Report Share Posted September 28, 2020 1 hour ago, Genava55 said: Your welcome and thank you for taking the time for it. I think the biggest issue is finding a proper style and design for the buildings. Since the Thracians of the Odrysian kingdom were heavily Hellenized, I don't think a wooden design is suitable. Maybe something with more stones, even for the houses. Buenas , @Genava55 , Ya me he puesto en marcha , además de arsácidas , lusitanos ... estoy trabajando con los Tracios .Creo que ya hay demasiada influencia Helenística en el juego por ahora como la propias facciones griegas (Atenas y Esparta) , también hay otras facciones muy helenizadas como ( Macedonios , seléucidas) y los Ptolemaicos (cada vez lo son más ) .También los Arsácidas en los que trabajo necesitan un toquecito helenístico y por ello creo que sería buena idea hacer a los Tracios lo más únicos posibles( con algo de influencia griega inevitablemente por motivos históricos ) , no va a ser problema , encontré suficientes referencias para edificios y unidades poco helenizadas e incluso de influencia Dacia .Para hacer a los tracios más únicos , me basaré lo mínimo posible en los Odrisios pero también es inevitable hacerles referencias . No sé si estará de acuerdo , pero eso también ayudara a la jugabilidad , por que si muchas facciones tienen las mismas referencias helenísticas , puede ser un poco liosos en partidas rápidas . Posdata; Sería una arquitectura singular , casi toda en madera tallada.(eso me inspira para las bonificaciones de civ.) y va a quedar muy bonita . Disculpe las molestias * 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 28, 2020 Report Share Posted September 28, 2020 Pos-posdata ; Haré una arquitectura más asemejada a las tribus Tracias y no al Reino Odrisio. Disculpen las molestias* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted September 28, 2020 Report Share Posted September 28, 2020 (edited) 51 minutes ago, Duileoga said: Posdata; Sería una arquitectura singular , casi toda en madera tallada.(eso me inspira para las bonificaciones de civ.) y va a quedar muy bonita . Maybe it could work better for the Dacians, are you thinking about a design based on wooden planks, wooden beams and wooden tiles? 1 hour ago, Duileoga said: Pos-posdata ; Haré una arquitectura más asemejada a las tribus Tracias y no al Reino Odrisio. Isn't it a problem for the heroes and the units? To miss the Hellenized counterparts of the Thracians? Edited September 28, 2020 by Genava55 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundiata Posted September 28, 2020 Report Share Posted September 28, 2020 2 hours ago, Genava55 said: Since the Thracians of the Odrysian kingdom were heavily Hellenized, I don't think a wooden design is suitable. 22 minutes ago, Genava55 said: Maybe it could work better for the Dacians, are you thinking about a design based on wooden planks, wooden beams and wooden tiles? Definitely, there was a lot of Hellenization in Thrace, especially the Odryssian Kingdom, but I don't feel like going full Hellenistic is the right choice. It's my impression that outside of a few royal centres, Hellenistic modes of living weren't as pervasive as you'd expect from truly Hellenistic states. Hellenistic influence seems to be much more of an elite thing, hence it's relevance for elite structures, but Thracians weren't highly urbanized and these Hellenistic style displays of wealth and power probably aren't representative for all of Thrace. So I'd propose of mix of rural Thracian style (lots of wood) for non-elite structures, and Hellenistic influence in elite structures. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted September 28, 2020 Report Share Posted September 28, 2020 (edited) On 9/28/2020 at 5:00 PM, Sundiata said: Definitely, there was a lot of Hellenization in Thrace, especially the Odryssian Kingdom, but I don't feel like going full Hellenistic is the right choice. It's my impression that outside of a few royal centres, Hellenistic modes of living weren't as pervasive as you'd expect from truly Hellenistic states. Hellenistic influence seems to be much more of an elite thing, hence it's relevance for elite structures, but Thracians weren't highly urbanized and these Hellenistic style displays of wealth and power probably aren't representative for all of Thrace. So I'd propose of mix of rural Thracian style (lots of wood) for non-elite structures, and Hellenistic influence in elite structures. Sure not fully Hellenized. But still they have access to artillery, walls, fortresses with a proper Hellenic design. Their units use hellenic weapons as well. This is why I suggested making a design that could fit a few Hellenized buildings. All woods make the Hellenic buildings super-ugly. Stones or stone and wood could be a better design. And when I mean stones, I don't necessarily mean Hellenic super polished buildings with cutted stones.** The two capitals were Helis and Seuthopolis, just sayin'... Edit: to be clear, I wish it could represent both the common people and the elite. I think they have more native buildings (rock-cut monument and royal tombs notably) based on stones. ** example from my country Edited September 29, 2020 by Genava55 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 20 hours ago, Genava55 said: Maybe it could work better for the Dacians, are you thinking about a design based on wooden planks, wooden beams and wooden tiles? Isn't it a problem for the heroes and the units? To miss the Hellenized counterparts of the Thracians? Buenas @Genava55 Estoy ya en curso para las traducciones y referencias de edificios y unidades , HAY MUCHA INFORMACIÓN EN ABECEDARIO CIRÍLICO , solo tengo que encontrar traducciones de esas traducciones para hacer traducciones al español a su vez . Para los héroes ya encontré nombres con sus fechas y referencias , solo hace falta ponerles el aspecto físico . Se las traeré en completo (eso espero ) en unas semanas ,(si alguien encuentra información , cuanto más grande y amplia sea mejor ( no tengo problema en investigar extensas referencias ) y así tardaré solo unos días . Disculpen las molestias* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 20 hours ago, Sundiata said: Definitely, there was a lot of Hellenization in Thrace, especially the Odryssian Kingdom, but I don't feel like going full Hellenistic is the right choice. It's my impression that outside of a few royal centres, Hellenistic modes of living weren't as pervasive as you'd expect from truly Hellenistic states. Hellenistic influence seems to be much more of an elite thing, hence it's relevance for elite structures, but Thracians weren't highly urbanized and these Hellenistic style displays of wealth and power probably aren't representative for all of Thrace. So I'd propose of mix of rural Thracian style (lots of wood) for non-elite structures, and Hellenistic influence in elite structures. Buenas @Sundiata Estoy de acuerdo , además creo que si se hacen primero los Tracios (aún con alguna influencia helenística) luego se podrían añadir más elementos de estilo griego (edificios y unidades ) y a esos elementos nuevos se les incorporaría a los Odrisios y entonces tendríamos dos facciones nuevas y originales. Disculpe las molestias* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 Buenas , aquí tengo un boceto sobre las unidades y estructuras ; Unidades ;(28) Infantería ;(5) (Reclutados en ;"cuarteles") 1.Lancero;---------------------------------------------------------------------(Taruthin ) 2.Escaramuzador(con espada corta);------------------------------------------(Skálmēsinas ) 3.Espadachín(con espada curva y larga sujeta con dos manos;---------------(Rhompháiatinos ) 4.Arquero ;--------------------------------------------------------------------(Romfeai ) 5.Guerrero con hacha;--------------------------------------------------------( Pelekusoris ) (Reclutados en ;"cuarteles "y "centro urbano") 1.Lancero;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------( Taruthin ) 2.Escaramuzador(con espada corta);-------------------------------------------------( Skálmēsinas) *Posibilidad que toda la infantería menos arquero , tenga dos armas , la X y las javalinas, y los escaramuzadores tengan espada. Infantería campeona;(3) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Campeón tracio;----------------------------------------------( Zibythides) 2.Jefe tracio;---------------------------------------------------( Poris ) 3. Mujer guerrera tracia;---------------------------------------( Mokasokos ) Infantería mercenaria ;(2) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Mercenario dacio(genérico);--------------------------------(... zenis) 2.Mercenario ilirio(genérico);---------------------------------( ...zenis ) Infantería campeona mercenaria;(1) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Mercenario Hoplita griego ;----------------------------------( ... zenis ) Caballería;(2) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Caballería ligera (con hacha , espada...);-------------------( Khōra mezēnai ) 2.Escaramuzador a caballo;-------------------------------------( Khōra Hromphaia mezēnai ) (Reclutados en ;" "y "centro urbano") 1.Caballería ligera (con hacha , espada...);-------------------( Khōra mezēnai ) Caballería de élite;(2) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1. Jinete campeón ;-----------------------------------------(Zibunthides mezēnai) 2. Jinete escaramuzador campeón;----------------------(Zibunthides Hromphaia mezēnai ) Caballería mercenaria (no de élite);(2) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Caballería griega (con lanza);----------------------------(...zenis mezēnai ) 2.Caballería celta;-------------------------------------------( ...zenis mezēnai) Caballería mercenaria de élite;(1) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Arquero a caballo escita (con arco) ;-------------------( ... zenis mezēnai ) Civiles;(3) (Reclutados en ;" centro urbano") 1. Mujer;------------------------------------------------------------(Dentusykos ) (Reclutados en ;"Mercado ") 2. Comerciante;----------------------------------------------------(Paraoris) (Reclutados en ;"Templo ") 3. Sacerdote;-------------------------------------------------------(ktístai ) Armas de asedio;(1) (Reclutados en ;" fortaleza") 1.Ariete;--------------------------------------------------------------( Thurd-ide ) Arma de asedio mercenaria ;(1) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1.Catapulta macedonia ;----------------------------------------( ... ) Navíos ;(2) (Reclutados en ;" Puerto") 1.Balsa pesquera;----------------------------------------------------( ... ) 2.Navío mercante;---------------------------------------------------(... parai ) Navíos mercenario;(1) (Reclutados en ;" Puerto") 1.Navío militar griego;-----------------------------------------------(... zenis ... ) Héroes ;(3) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1." Spartacus";-------------------------------------(Σπάρτακος / Spártakos) (Llevó exitosas campañas de liberación de esclavos en la República romana) 2." Dromichaetes";--------------------------------(Δρομιχαίτης /Dromichaites) (Dromichaetes humilló a Lisímaco de macedonia y a las colonias griegas) 3." Hales";-------------------------------------------(.../ Chales) (Dirigió un gigantesco ejército tracio que venció a los atenienses en el sur de Tracia) Importantes líderes Tribales Tracios(Para la "IA"); Nombre Fecha Original 1.Olorus (siglo V a.c) Ὄλορος 2.Syrmios (siglo IV a.c) Σύρμος 3.Bergaios ( 400 – 350 a.c ) Βεργαῖος 4.Dromichaetes (300 - c. 280 a. c) Δρομιχαίτης 5.Diegylis (siglos III-II a.c) Διήγυλις 6.Zibelmios (siglo II a.c) Ζιβέλμιος 7.Mostis (130 a.c-90 a.c) Μόστις 8.Abrupolis (200 a.c -170 a.c ) Αβρουπόλις Estructuras ; Edificios comunes (15); 1.Centro cívico;-----------------------------------------( Dava mēr) 2.casa;--------------------------------------------------( Sarpos ) 3.Almacén;----------------------------------------------( ... ) 4.Alquería/granja;---------------------------------------( Khōra) 5.Corral;-------------------------------------------------( ...) 1.Oveja;----------------(... ) 2.Cerdo;---------------(... ) 3.Cabra;---------------(Búzas ) 4.Gallina;--------------(Génton ) 5.Toro;----------------(Bonassos ) 6.Vaca;----------------(... ) 6.Torre de defensa ;---------------------------------------(Mossun ) 7.Cuartel;--------------------------------------------------( ...) 8.Herrería;-------------------------------------------------(... ) 9.Templo;--------------------------------------------------(Thrakē dón ) 10.Muralla;-------------------------------------------------(Didza ) 11.Huerto;--------------------------------------------------(Strambas) 12.Mercado;-----------------------------------------------( Para ) 13.Puerto;--------------------------------------------------(... ) 14.Fortaleza;-----------------------------------------------(Disza ) 15.Torreta de defensa pequeña;---------------------------(Paurakis Mossun) Puerta de muralla;----------------------------------------(Dero) Edificios especiales (5) 1."Maravilla" ;---------------------------------------------(... ) fuentes; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rulers_of_Thrace_and_Daciahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spartacushttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Thracian_kingshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hales_(king)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thracian_warfare Las traducciones las saqué de las fuentes que me trajo @Genava55 (A quien le doy las gracias) Posdata; La información está incompleta y es un boceto , pero con ayuda y unas semanas estará lista(eso espero , y gracias) Disculpen las molestias * 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 4 hours ago, Duileoga said: Estoy ya en curso para las traducciones y referencias de edificios y unidades , HAY MUCHA INFORMACIÓN EN ABECEDARIO CIRÍLICO , solo tengo que encontrar traducciones de esas traducciones para hacer traducciones al español a su vez . This is why I made a synthesis on the 7th page of this thread based on a few academic books and articles. To simplify the research for the others. 4 hours ago, Duileoga said: Estoy de acuerdo , además creo que si se hacen primero los Tracios (aún con alguna influencia helenística) luego se podrían añadir más elementos de estilo griego (edificios y unidades ) y a esos elementos nuevos se les incorporaría a los Odrisios y entonces tendríamos dos facciones nuevas y originales. I don't see the point in making two Thracian civ based nearly on the same material. Especially if there are the Dacians and the Illyrians as other potential civs. 7 minutes ago, Duileoga said: Guerrero con hacha Is there any evidence for battle-axe among the Thracians? Just curious, I am genuinely interested by the topic. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 On 9/28/2020 at 2:38 PM, Genava55 said: Su bienvenida y gracias por tomarse el tiempo para ello. Creo que el mayor problema es encontrar un estilo y diseño adecuados para los edificios. Dado que los tracios del reino de Odrysian estaban muy helenizados, no creo que un diseño de madera sea adecuado. Tal vez algo con más piedras, incluso para las casas. Para crear a la facción de los Odrisios; Importantes líderes del reino Odrisio (Para la "IA"); Nombre Fecha Original 1.Teres I (480 a. C.-450 a. C.) Τήρης 2.Esparádoco (450 a. C.-431 a. C.) Σπαράδοκος 3.Sitalces (431 a. C.-424 a. C.) Σιτάλκης 4.Seutes I (424 a. C.-410 a. C.) Σεύθης 5.Amádoco I (410 a. C.-390 a. C.) Ἀμάδοκος 6.Hebrizelmis (390 a. C.-384 a. C.) Ἑβροζέλμης 7.Cotis I (384 a. C.-358 a. C.) Κότυς 8.Cersobleptes (358 a. C.-341 a. C.) Κερσοβλέπτης (pongo el nombre en griego antiguo por quien sepa descifrarlo y poner su fonética) Lista de otros reyes odrisios menos relevantes y más débiles 1.Berisades (358 a. C.-352 a. C.)-------Bηρισάδης 2.Cetriporis (352 a. C.-347 a. C.)------Κετρίπορις 3.Amádoco II (358 a. C.-351 a. C.)----Ἀμάδοκος II 4.Teres II (351 a. C.-342 a. C.)---------Τήρης II 5.Seutes III (331 a. C.-300 a. C.)------Σεύθης III 6.Cotis II (300 a. C.-280 a. C.)---------Κότυς II 7.Raizdos (ca. 280 a. C.)---------------Ροίγος 8.Cotis III (ca. 270 a. C.)---------------Κότυς III 9.Rascuporis (240 a. C.-215 a. C.)----Ραισκούπορις 10.Seutes IV (215 a. C.-190 a. C.)------Σεύθης IV Posibles unidades ; Héroes ;(3) (Reclutados en ;" ") 1." Teres I ";-------------------------------------(Τήρης ) 2." Sitalces";-------------------------------------(Σιτάλκης) 3." Kotys I ";-------------------------------------(Κότυς) Fuentes de los reyes odrisios; https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reino_odrisio Disculpe me las molestias* 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abdominin Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 (edited) Interesting enough, Arrian of Nicomedia described the use of war wagons by some Thracian tribes. Source; The Thracians 700 BC-AD 46 (Men-at-Arms) by Christopher Webber and Angus McBride, 2001, ISBN 1-84176-329-2, page 10 Edited September 29, 2020 by Abdominin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 (edited) Quote Book 1 DEATH OF PHILIP & ACCESSION OF ALEXANDER HIS WARS WITH THE THRACIANS IT is said that Philip died when Pythodelus was archon at Athens, and that his son Alexander, being then about twenty years of age, marched into Peloponnesus as soon as he had secured the regal power. There he assembled all the Greeks who were within the limits of Peloponnesus, and asked from them the supreme command of the expedition against the Persians, an office which they had already conferred upon Philip. He received the honour which he asked from all except the Lacedaemonians, who replied that it was an hereditary custom of theirs, not to follow others but to lead them. The Athenians also attempted to bring about some political change; but they were so alarmed at the very approach of Alexander, that they conceded to him even more ample public honours than those which had been bestowed upon Philip. He then returned into Macedonia and busied himself in preparing for the expedition into Asia. However, at the approach of spring he marched towards Thrace, into the lands of the Triballians and Illyrians, because he ascertained that these nations were meditating a change of policy; and at the same time, as they were lying on his frontier, he thought it inexpedient, when he was about to start on a campaign so far away from his own land, to leave them behind him without having been entirely subjugated. Setting out then from Amphipolis, he invaded the land of the people who were called independent Thracians, keeping the city of Philippi and Mount Orbelus on the left. Crossing the river Nessus, they say he arrived at mount Haemus on the tenth day. Here, along the defiles up the ascent to the mountain, he was met by many of the traders equipped with arms, as well as by the independent Thracians, who had made preparations to check the further advance of his expedition by seizing the summit of the Haemus, along which was the route for the passage of his army. They had collected their waggons, and placed them in front of them, not only using them as a rampart from which they might defend themselves, in case they shou ld be forced back, but also intending to let them loose upon the phalanx of the Macedonians, where the mountain was most precipitous, if they tried to ascend. They had come to the conclusion that the denser the phalanx was with which the waggons rushing down came into collision, the more easily would they scatter it by the violence of their fall upon it. But Alexander formed a plan by which he might cross the mountain with the least danger possible; and since he was resolved to run all risks, knowing that there were no means of passing elsewhere, he ordered the heavy-armed soldiers, as soon as the waggons began to rush down the declivity, to open their ranks, as many as the road was sufficiently wide to permit to do so and to stand apart, so that the waggons might roll down through the gap; but that those who were hemmed in on all sides should either stoop down together or even fall flat on the ground, and lock their shields compactly together, so that the waggons rushing down upon them, and in all probability by their very impetus leaping over them, might pass on without injuring them. And it turned out just as Alexander had conjectured and exhorted. For some of the men made gaps in the phalanx (and others locked their shields together). The waggons rolled over the shields without doing much injury, not a single man being killed under them. Then the Macedonians regained their courage, inasmuch as the waggons, which they had excessively dreaded, had inflicted no damage upon them. With a loud cry they assaulted the Thracians. Alexander ordered his archers to march from the right wing in front of the rest of the phalanx, because there the passage was easier, and to shoot at the Thracians wherever they advanced. He himself took his own guard, the shield-bearing infantry and the Agrianians, and led them to the left. Then the archers shot at the Thracians who sallied forward, and repulsed them; and the phalanx, coming to close fighting, easily drove away from their position men who were light-armed and badly-equipped barbarians. The consequence was, they no longer waited to receive Alexander marching against them from the left, but casting away their arms they fled down the mountain as each man best could. About 1,500 of them were killed; but only a few were taken prisoners on account of their swiftness of foot and acquaintance with the country. However, all the women who were accompanying them were captured, as were also their children and all their booty. That's not really war waggons but yes they used waggons on the battlefield at one occasion. Edited September 29, 2020 by Genava55 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 5 hours ago, Genava55 said: This is why I made a synthesis on the 7th page of this thread based on a few academic books and articles. To simplify the research for the others. I don't see the point in making two Thracian civ based nearly on the same material. Especially if there are the Dacians and the Illyrians as other potential civs. Is there any evidence for battle-axe among the Thracians? Just curious, I am genuinely interested by the topic. Buenas ; @Genava55 Sobre la cuestión de Tracios y Odrisios , yo me decanto por Tracios(menos helenizados) , y parece muy interesante desarrollar Dacios e ilirios , pero con Arsácidas , Lusitanos , Tracios , Mayas... ahora estoy muy ocupado y si me es posible espero ayudar en su desarrollo también. Respecto a las "Hachas"; Los tracios usaban hachas de combate ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thracian_warfare Hachas de un solo filo y hachas de doas filos ; -Hacha de un filo;-----------------(Sagaris ) -Hacha de doble filo;--------------(Pelekus ) Aspecto ; (hachas de un solo filo) También hay referencias Históricas en museos búlgaros; (aspecto de hachas de doble filo) Aspecto de esas hachas en cerámica griega ; Representación actual de guerreros Tracio con hacha; Disculpe las molestias* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 Buenas ; Aspecto para las mujeres Tracias ; Por la información que encontré , las mujeres tracias gozaban de mucha independencia e incluso eran combativas y lo más interesante , poseían tatuajes al igual que los hombres ; Reseñas en cerámica griega ; (noten se los tatuajes en brazos y piernas) Referencias actuales; Eso me inspiró para las posibles Bonificaciones de los Tracios ; -Bonificación de Civilización; 1."Kurta "-madera-(La mayoría de los edificios al estar construidos casi en exclusiva en madera , son más rápidos de construir , pero más fáciles de destruir) 2."Dentusykos"-mujer tracia-(Las mujeres tracias luchan con más fuerza que las mujeres de otras facciones siendo capaces de subir los tres rangos al igual que la infantería ligera , pero aún estado en el tercer rango no serán tan fuertes como las "Mujeres guerreras tracias "o "Mokasokos Darsas") -Bonificación de equipos; 1."Sura Dentu "-fuerza tribal-(Cuando el jugador escoge a la facción Tracia , si se alía con otro jugador/IA que también sean Tracios , sus unidades y la de los aliados son un "X" porciento más fuertes , cuantos más aliados tracios estén juntos , más fuertes serán cada uno , solo mientras dure la alianza ) 2." Mokasokos Darsas"-mujeres guerreras-(Cuando se alía con otra facción , esa facción consigue una bonificación que hace más resistentes a sus mujeres) -Tecnologías especiales; 1." Skálmē"-espada -( las unidades de infantería y caballería tracia armadas con la espada curva y larga sujetada con dos manos , dan su primer golpe a la unidad enemiga con mucha más fuerta que los siguientes golpes ) 2."Hromphaia"o "Peltasta" -jabalinas (Menos los mercenarios , arqueros y espadachines con espada larga de dos manos , las demás unidades Tracias de infantería y caballería poseen dos armas , la propia de la unidad y jabalinas) (ejemplo; Guerrero con hacha y con jabalinas , unidad de héroe con jabalinas , caballería ligera (con hacha , espada, lanza...) y con jabalinas, campeón tracio con jabalinas , mujer y mujer guerrera con jabalinas ...) Disculpen las molestias* 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 5 minutes ago, Duileoga said: That's a Labrys. Labrys is a ceremonial axe. 6 minutes ago, Duileoga said: No doubt that Persians used axes but for the Thracians the question remains. 14 minutes ago, Duileoga said: This kind of shape for axe-heads is better suited for tools. You can find axe-heads everywhere, it doesn't mean it is a weapon all the time (obviously). The article from where the figure comes doesn't tell if those are weapons. 19 minutes ago, Duileoga said: Those are clearly medieval shapes. Probably Varangian. 23 minutes ago, Duileoga said: -Hacha de un filo;-----------------(Sagaris ) The Sagaris is a Scythian axe. It is plausible, we do find some in the North among the Getae but that's not something common for the Thracian infantrymen. Here what the book "A Companion to Ancient Thrace" (p.429) tells on the matter: Hasta la fecha sólo hay dos hachas de batalla de segura procedencia tracia, una de Sboryanovo, la otra de la rica tumba en el montículo III cerca de Kralevo. La fecha de ambos contextos es la primera mitad del siglo III (Stoyanov y otros 2006, 44-45, fig. 65). El inventario de la tumba de Kralevo sugiere que estas hachas fueron utilizadas por jinetes. Hachas similares, conocidas en el Cáucaso y en Escitia ya en el siglo IV, son armas típicas de la caballería del reino del Bósforo cimeriano del siglo IV y se representaron en artefactos del norte del Mar Negro (Melyukova 1964, 65-68, pl. 21.10-16, 21). 26 minutes ago, Duileoga said: -Hacha de doble filo;--------------(Pelekus ) That's another word for the Labrys. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted September 30, 2020 Report Share Posted September 30, 2020 11 hours ago, Duileoga said: Sobre la cuestión de Tracios y Odrisios , yo me decanto por Tracios(menos helenizados) , y parece muy interesante desarrollar Dacios e ilirios , pero con Arsácidas , Lusitanos , Tracios , Mayas... ahora estoy muy ocupado y si me es posible espero ayudar en su desarrollo también. I am not suggesting you should do all the factions, this is simply to remind the bigger picture. The issue of the Thracians was mainly the building design and the lack of both accuracy and cultural reference to the Thracian culture. I think it is better to keep a design entirely based on wood for the Dacians because there are less alternatives in their case. But as you are proposing to do two different sets, distinguishing the Thracians and Odrysians, and as nobody is complaining (silence means consent), I see my position as the minority and I will no longer express my position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 30, 2020 Report Share Posted September 30, 2020 10 hours ago, Genava55 said: That's a Labrys. Labrys is a ceremonial axe. No doubt that Persians used axes but for the Thracians the question remains. This kind of shape for axe-heads is better suited for tools. You can find axe-heads everywhere, it doesn't mean it is a weapon all the time (obviously). The article from where the figure comes doesn't tell if those are weapons. Those are clearly medieval shapes. Probably Varangian. The Sagaris is a Scythian axe. It is plausible, we do find some in the North among the Getae but that's not something common for the Thracian infantrymen. Here what the book "A Companion to Ancient Thrace" (p.429) tells on the matter: Hasta la fecha sólo hay dos hachas de batalla de segura procedencia tracia, una de Sboryanovo, la otra de la rica tumba en el montículo III cerca de Kralevo. La fecha de ambos contextos es la primera mitad del siglo III (Stoyanov y otros 2006, 44-45, fig. 65). El inventario de la tumba de Kralevo sugiere que estas hachas fueron utilizadas por jinetes. Hachas similares, conocidas en el Cáucaso y en Escitia ya en el siglo IV, son armas típicas de la caballería del reino del Bósforo cimeriano del siglo IV y se representaron en artefactos del norte del Mar Negro (Melyukova 1964, 65-68, pl. 21.10-16, 21). That's another word for the Labrys. Buenas ; Espero confirmar que tuvieron "Hachas de Combate" históricamente hablando (si no las tuvieron no hay nada que hacer), porque sería otra particularidad posible de facción .Como todo apunta a que no, se puede suprimir esa unidad o a lo mejor sustituirlo por un "Hondero"( tengo alguna referencia, pero claro , necesito unas bases que lo confirme con seguridad ) Disculpen las molestias* En este caso creo que ha sido mucha molestia , gracias por sus correcciones @Genava55 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted September 30, 2020 Report Share Posted September 30, 2020 No hay problema, estoy feliz de traer un ojo crítico. Como ya he leído gran parte del libro que he citado, tengo una buena idea de lo que parece plausible y lo que no. Como usaban espadas con hojas anchas y curvas, las hachas eran de poca utilidad. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 30, 2020 Report Share Posted September 30, 2020 6 minutes ago, Genava55 said: I am not suggesting you should do all the factions, this is simply to remind the bigger picture. The issue of the Thracians was mainly the building design and the lack of both accuracy and cultural reference to the Thracian culture. I think it is better to keep a design entirely based on wood for the Dacians because there are less alternatives in their case. But as you are proposing to do two different sets, distinguishing the Thracians and Odrysians, and as nobody is complaining (silence means consent), I see my position as the minority and I will no longer express my position. Buenas , Ahí estaba mi error , no mirar el panorama general , mi intención no es hacer todas las facciones sino apoyar en lo que pueda (lo máximo posible ) para ayudar a este juego de gran potencial. Una idea posible , sería hacer que para los tracios , las dos primeras fases estuvieran basadas en casi madera con un estilo único y al llegar a la tercera fase (fase urbana) barios edificios sino todos , pasasen a tener más influencia helenística representando así su evolución al "Reino Odrisio" e incluyendo unidades algo helenizadas para la tercera fase de las unidades. Así ; -Conciliamos ambas ideas Tracios y Odrisios . -Evitamos crear dos facciones(tracias). -Podemos dar en un plano general un aspecto diferenciado para la posible facción "Dacia". -Y mostramos una evolución de facción (que sería una faceta única para esta facción "Tracia") Disculpen las molestias* 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 30, 2020 Report Share Posted September 30, 2020 6 minutes ago, Genava55 said: No hay problema, estoy feliz de traer un ojo crítico. Como ya he leído gran parte del libro que he citado, tengo una buena idea de lo que parece plausible y lo que no. Como usaban espadas con hojas anchas y curvas, las hachas eran de poca utilidad. ¡Genial ! si ya ha leído aquel libro y tiene una idea orientativa , no dudaré en corregir mis errores acorde a sus consejos( ya que ahorra estoy muy ocupado ya como para leer más fuentes) 22 minutes ago, Genava55 said: I am not suggesting you should do all the factions, this is simply to remind the bigger picture. The issue of the Thracians was mainly the building design and the lack of both accuracy and cultural reference to the Thracian culture. I think it is better to keep a design entirely based on wood for the Dacians because there are less alternatives in their case. But as you are proposing to do two different sets, distinguishing the Thracians and Odrysians, and as nobody is complaining (silence means consent), I see my position as the minority and I will no longer express my position. No sabía que acá el silencio significaba consentimiento. Disculpen me las molestias* 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duileoga Posted September 30, 2020 Report Share Posted September 30, 2020 Buenas , Acá les traigo imágenes de "Capas" , pero que también podrían usarse para diseño de la ropa; Aquí , diseños para escudos ; (los escudos Tracios eran en forma como de media luna ("Peltes") y ovalados) Disculpen las molestias* 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundiata Posted September 30, 2020 Report Share Posted September 30, 2020 1 hour ago, Genava55 said: But as you are proposing to do two different sets, distinguishing the Thracians and Odrysians, and as nobody is complaining (silence means consent), Hmmm, I don't think silence means consent. Thracians with both "traditional" as well as Odryssian Kingdom references is perfect in my opinion, as they coexisted. On 9/28/2020 at 3:05 PM, Genava55 said: This is why I suggested making a design that could fit a few Hellenized buildings. All woods make the Hellenic buildings super-ugly. Stones or stone and wood could be a better design. And when I mean stones, I don't necessarily mean Hellenic super polished buildings with cutted stones.** The two capitals were Helis and Seuthopolis, just sayin'... Stone and wood is good. But the stones should actually be well cut in the Hellenistic inspired structures. But most Thracian architecture wasn't Greek style cut stone. Thrace was relatively densely populated, and sites like Seuthopolis and Helis (isn't that one Getic?), definitely represent a fractional amount of the population. So indeed, good references for elite structures, but not for the rest. 1 hour ago, Genava55 said: I think it is better to keep a design entirely based on wood for the Dacians because there are less alternatives in their case. But the Dacian capital Sarmizegetusa also featured stone architecture and even a stone paved road. It's better to just use Dacian references for the Dacians and Thracian references for the Thracians, regardless of comparisons between the two. They shouldn't be artificially contrasted, nor equated. There's enough material in this thread to create a number of referenced structures, unique to Thracians, as well a number of referenced structures for Dacians. That should be the start. 12 hours ago, Genava55 said: That's a Labrys. Labrys is a ceremonial axe. 12 hours ago, Duileoga said: 12 hours ago, Genava55 said: The Sagaris is a Scythian axe. It is plausible, we do find some in the North among the Getae but that's not something common for the Thracian infantrymen. Here what the book "A Companion to Ancient Thrace" (p.429) tells on the matter: Here's an article about a Thracian axe recently returned to Bulgaria. A Bulgarian archaeologist describes it as a Labrys, and points out it was probably a battle axe, also saying "She points out that the Ancient Thracians used the double-bitted labrys ax for both battle and hunting as well as a cult (religious) artifact, and a symbol of power." http://archaeologyinbulgaria.com/2014/03/14/mysterious-benefactor-from-maryland-returns-thracian-ax-labrys-smuggled-from-bulgaria-to-usa/ The axe looks a lot more functional than ceremonial axes (more ornate ceremonial axes usually don't look so functional): And at least one Thracian mural shows it's functionality as more than just a religious symbol: 1 hour ago, Duileoga said: Una idea posible , sería hacer que para los tracios , las dos primeras fases estuvieran basadas en casi madera con un estilo único y al llegar a la tercera fase (fase urbana) barios edificios sino todos , pasasen a tener más influencia helenística representando así su evolución al "Reino Odrisio" e incluyendo unidades algo helenizadas para la tercera fase de las unidades. Something like this would be cool. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.