-
Posts
1.515 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
17
Everything posted by BreakfastBurrito_007
-
Final era + full upgrades.
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to Akira Kurosawa's topic in Help & Feedback
What is wrong with this? With this cheat you save time on everything, including buildings. Cheats can be used online too. -
Final era + full upgrades.
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to Akira Kurosawa's topic in Help & Feedback
you can always just use in-game cheats if you want to do sim-city. just click "cheats enabled" and when the game starts write: "gift from the gods". -
Ideally the fun comes from figuring out how to win vs other players and with other players. Ultimately this should not be stressful or else its not fun. I agree some people take things too far, I am not concerned about @Atrik's setup, I am just suggesting that we decide what things can and can't be automated before we lose parts of the game.
-
Non-random BuildingAI
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to real_tabasco_sauce's topic in Gameplay Discussion
main concern is the meat shield meta now applying to this. Perhaps if melee armor/damage values are rebalanced in the next community mod, then it won’t be as much of a problem. -
Non-random BuildingAI
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to real_tabasco_sauce's topic in Gameplay Discussion
I think we probably want to have a target selection similar to units before it gets put in community mod, I think it would reduce ways to exploit the new building AI and give players more control. -
Wow! This would be so busted in gameplay! Could you imagine you are desperately chasing these archercav and losing all of your units in a tedious course of 5 minutes and you realize your opponent hasn't even looked over to control them? @Yekaterina I guess I had a lucky first guess for a cheat that is possible.
-
How about making archercav that know when to run away before getting damaged.
-
Non-random BuildingAI
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to real_tabasco_sauce's topic in Gameplay Discussion
that is a very simplistic and pre-conclusive statement. Please consider the following differences between buildings and units: lower overall damage output no volleys enemies do not shoot back at the tower (unless its slingers/melee) There are many cases where you would want enemies to die sooner rather than later. A rush, where you want to kill 1 cav unit rather than none. Slingers attacking your tower and you want to kill some rather than none. Perhaps an army you want to weaken before you fight it. The main takeaway I can forsee is that building arrows would have a greater immediate effect than before. -
Non-random BuildingAI
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to real_tabasco_sauce's topic in Gameplay Discussion
@chrstgtr we tested it just now and we encountered that it currently kills the units in the order that they entered the range of the tower, first to last. He is working on a way to make it update so that it prefers the closer unit. -
Non-random BuildingAI
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to real_tabasco_sauce's topic in Gameplay Discussion
At this point I think it might kill the army slower overall, but make initial kills faster, which is usually more valuable. -
@Stan` that's a good point about the snares. I would argue that there is a spectrum and that skill elements should neither be eliminated nor overcome strategy as the basis of the game. There is coming up with a strategy and then executing the strategy and both should be important. In AoE 4 the player's strategy is nearly totally defined by what building they choose to age up with, which makes for highly formulaic gameplay. I am worried that if we add enough automated mechanics to the game, then we will lose the execution of strategies.
-
What advantage is this?
-
I disagree, RTS games should be based on skill as well as strategy. Aoe2 is more popular than aoe 4 for this reason because aoe4 removed almost all skill in unit movement eco management ect. It is inherently more boring to automate aspects of the game. I am not saying that we should consider @Atrik a cheater, I am saying we need to establish a boundary so that the game remains fun
-
guys its off topic, and there are times when and when not to feed/help a rushed ally, and player skill is taken into that valuation unoffensively. simple as that. The main topic at hand is way more concerning. It is about the design scope of 0ad. I have noticed @Atrik's mod in-game and find it very interesting. In other games they consider such features as autoqueue, % management, and especially quick-start to be "macros" that automate smaller aspects of the game. In some games it is allowed and in others they are not, but it is important for us to decide on a boundary for them in 0ad. In Aoe2 there have been macros that allow for rapid sequential placement of farms and 1-to-1 villager assignment with 1 click and drag, and this is a cheat. I am confident that someone could design a feature that automatically executes the "sniping" micromanagement technique that we have been using in the current meta, and this would be disastrous.
-
Another thought I had was about team voice chat. I have recently seen some teams start to use mumble or discord to talk to each other while they play, and it is quite evident how big of an advantage it is over typing in ally chat. I think adding an in-game system for this would be great since it is not ideal to have to find and follow players when you are on a new team.
-
Its already possible to do this, but I think the key difference would be the cases where the answer the spec has to give is very simple answer such as "champions" or even "yes/no" in response to a more pointed question. guess it comes down to a choice: specs accessing global chat and not reading team's chat, or specs being able to read team chat but not write to global chat. I am not sure which is better/ which people would want. I just think the entertainment value of spectating games would be a lot more if specs could see what teams are planning/discussing.
-
Non-random BuildingAI
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to real_tabasco_sauce's topic in Gameplay Discussion
There are certainly better solutions. -
Non-random BuildingAI
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to real_tabasco_sauce's topic in Gameplay Discussion
In either case I would like to see melee units die faster to towers and ranged units slower to towers. -
well to take his point literally is to miss the point.
-
excuse my foul language here, but it is incessant from this guy. every other word he writes has something to do with hate.
-
I wonder if Nazism is something we can moderate within hosted games? I am quite tired of seeing it as it brings down the fun of a game. I wish more hosts would ban adequately when it is in chat but it seems not to happen except for 1 or two hosts I know.
-
The hero unit is ridiculously OP
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to Yekaterina's topic in Gameplay Discussion
If you independently target units, you can avoid being distracted by heroes. In other situations killing the hero is extremely valuable. Hero raids in your base is just something you need to notice. Another thing that helps thwart hero raids is loom which prevents hero from killing women in 1 hit. -
Incredibly fast training times
BreakfastBurrito_007 replied to wang_wei_2's topic in General Discussion
Wow! That is amazingly OP. I have observed Han players being losing massive fights and staying at 200 pop. This alongside the crossbow training tech is probably why.
