Lion.Kanzen

@elexis we have same discuss with Mercenary camps, but is a thing that will be implement after first part.

Original idea is this. but we can't mix with RT1 training mercenaries concept ,merging both.

Because we haven't a definitive concept design. I can delete and we can discuss for many moths( cof cof) years. we can take decitions with @wraitii about the concept. estoy cerca de dormir así que lo dejaré claro. El ticket se puede cambiar varias veces. El punto es que sea un recordatorio.

Sorry I wrote in a bad time. I'm some sick of my stomach so I mean not the good guy right now. is hard to me say this but developers forgets the suggestion. Simple. But a ticket is a kind of memo.

10 times isn't enough... why you think are ticket for? ( sorry if I'm rude) the things discussed in forum many times are forgotten, even 10 times or 1000. The forum have more than 10 years old. The team haven't same members. For the new members can be the first time.

@elexis

You can do that right?

Need more dynamic, have a random mercenary roster of unit in them.

Yes in my design are linked by the biome, example. Desert biome you can get Persian units style, Egyptian can be the other. North Europe can be nice by Celtic and why not our first German mini faction ( before start with the rest of planned civs.) Returning to the topic, why not more human evidence in the maps, houses, little details. Looks an inhabited place. But yes mercenary camps needs more development in future.

Here is an equivalent of the review I saw in Spanish by Jino. Another RTS that's fail.

may be take like AoE 3 building something around to capture(new type of capture by building)(?)

One my favorites. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Columbian_trans-oceanic_contact_theories#

The crossbow animation are working with new models?

How many variation we have? Can be suitable player choose like Seleucids? You know Han Dynasty have west, east south , armies.

Is funny because my next step was paste that link.

Read is in the post. No is no my style, so much work for a reference I can do something like that but...I don't work if I'm not sure somelse can use. joke... you mean this. http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?688378-Period-Accurate-Armor

Imperial Guards? troop type determines whether they wear armor or not, just like everywhere else in the world back then. Some missile troops, skirmishers, menials, squires, and rear-echelon soldiers were given minimal protection. http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?688378-Period-Accurate-Armor Originally Posted by Geoffrey of Villehardouin I do like the illustrations you posted myself, though they also do not look much like the terracota army in the photographs. They seem to be affected by the older style terracota army of Qin Shi Huang in their hairstyle and some of the armour. Not quite. For one thing the soldiers of Qin Shi Huang all wore leather armor while the armor in the Yangjiawan were steel. It's also worthwhile to mention that save for the Imperial Guards of Qin, most armored Qin troopers wear leather armor that only protects their front like an apron.Furthermore it shouldn't surprise people that the Early Han Dynasty essentially had similar looking equipment with then Qin. People tend to forget that the Qin Dynasty lasted only 15-22 years making it a really recent thing. Wont be surprising if aspects of its equipment & fashion carried over to the Han.

This armor should belong to all senior officers of the Han Military or the Chinese Emperor's guard. Unlike most rank & file soldiers of the period who only had a turban or a leather protective cap for headpro, he wore a metal lamellar helmet, tufted with what looks like Pheasant feathers. According to the book, a color between red and orange robes marked the elite members of the Han-Period Emperor's Imperial Guard, which were called "缇骑" possibly a cavalry formation.This armor is that of an average soldier of the Han period whose drawing is based off the Yangjiawan Terra Cotta Army (i.e. The "Mini-Terra Cotta Army" which contained miniatures from the Han Dynasty as opposed to the bigass life-sized ones of the First Qin Emperor's). He Wore a cloth/leather cap/turban. Its not clear if the cuirass possessed a single pauldron/upper arm guard over the left shoulder or it was just a mistake in the part of the sculptors (My Personal theory: cuirass only had a left shoulder guard to aid the use of a shield, commonly held in the left hand with the fighter often presenting his left side, alongside with his shield, to the enemy). Another soldier's armor. This one has two pauldrons/upper arm guards as opposed to the previus soldier. The color of robes indicates elite or professional infantryman status. (Possibly soldiers of the infantry members of the Imperial Guards). On his back he has a badge or plaque of some sort, suspected to indicate his unit and possibly his rank . The experts base this hypothesis on how latter Dynasties having such a practice of unit identification, in which lower ranked troopers had badges at the back while senior officers had badges up front.This one is a Cavalryman's Armor, also from the Mini-Terra Cotta Army, probably of the light cavalry variety like horse archers. He has a two-feather He-Guan (Headress?) and, like the regular trooper before him, has a badge/plaque on his back. Variations of this armor shows a large feather back-plumes similar to Polish-Lithuanian Hussars of the late 1600's. The book says that there is hypothesis on the plumes which ranges from the feathers marking out Cavalry Officers (the book says this is unlikely as it will mark them out in the field) to marking out battlefield messengers & runners.The following pieces are from the Wei Kingdom and its successor states and eventual winner of the 3 Kingdoms, the Ssu'ma Jin Dynasty period. Now these wouldve likely showed up in the 3 Kingdoms period.This is a cavalryman's armor of the Wei-Jin period, possibly of the heavy cavalry kind. Also possibly a general's or senior officers armor and is an upgrade of the Han Aristocrat's armor initially shown way up above this thread, he wear's something called "Hundred-Beaten Steel" Armor. The cap shown here is that of an official but most likely he wouldve worn a lamellar helmet too. They also seem to have worn a cap based off the Steppe Nomads that inhabit the northern/western borders of the Wei Kingdom/Jin Dynasty.This armor set also marked the first appearance of lamellar faulds/extensive leg armor in the Chinese armor kit, which marked the increasing usage & mastery of cavalry typical of Late Han/3 Kingdoms/Ssu'ma Jin ChinaFinally, the armor of the Wei Kingdom/Ssu'ma Jin Dynasty period infantryman. Soldiers of the period seem to now wear a metal helmet and there seems to be a change in the trousers too as long trousers seemed to be favored.

http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?610314-The-Roman-Empire-vs-Han-Dynasty-China/page6 enjoy this topic. http://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/history/discussion-on-the-ancient-asian-armies/

The Han Dynasty. The Han army was the first Ancient Chinese army that truely embraced cavalry warfare to its maximum. Due to constant incurisons by the Xiongnu/Huns in the North, the Emperor Wudi realized that, to defeat the Xiongnu, a formidable and mobile cavalry force must be trained. Throughout the reign of Wudi, the Han army grew and so did its cavalry. The Han cavalry did not have cataphracts, and primarily relied on speed and mobility. Unlike their Roman counterparts, Han cavalrymen did not wear metal helmets, and wore fairly little armor. Han cavalry was geared towards warfare with nomadic groups, and speed was essence. The defeat of the Xiongnu by generals Wei Qing and Huo Qubing, and the subsequent expansion of the Han Empire into Central Asia, could not have been realized without its extremely mobile cavalry force. http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7801

Is very very common like the velite for romans ( republican). why not Cataphracts like cavalry? Like they try to use from nomads.

And we have big monster. Weiyang Palace (simplified Chinese: 未央宫; traditional Chinese: 未央宮; pinyin: Wèiyāng Gōng) was a palace complex, located near the city of Chang'an (modern-day Xi'an). Built in 200 BC at the request of Han Gaozu, under the supervision of his prime minister Xiao He, it served as the administrative centre and imperial residence of the Western Han Dynasty, as well as the Western Jin dynasty and several other regimes during the Northern and Southern Dynasties. The palace survived until the Tang dynasty when it was burnt down by marauding invaders en route to Tang Chang'an. This was the largest palace ever built on Earth, covering 4.8 km² (1,200 acres), which is 6.7 times the size of the current Forbidden City, or 11 times the size of the Vatican City.[1]

--- MAGNIFICENT AND SOLEMN: The Zhongyue Temple, built at the foot of the Songshan Mountain in the Han Dynasty (202 B.C.-A.D. 220), was the earliest base of Taoist activities in China (CFP)