Jump to content

Why are Roman CS swordsmen called Hastātus


Emacz
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Emacz said:

When I google Hastātus Wiki says: "armed with a spear"

Not a spear, a pilum. They threw pila at the enemy, before engaging in melee combat. 

Unfortunately, 0 A. D. still has no way for units to use multiple attacks, so the Hastatus is melee only. If we get to have units with multiple attacks, the plan is for Advanced and Elite Hastati to throw pila first, then engage in melee.

https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/wiki/Civ_Romans_Republican

Edited by Deicide4u
Grammar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deicide4u said:

If we get to have units with multiple attacks, the plan is for Advanced and Elite Hastati to throw pila first, then engage in melee.

This would be sooo cool. And a good idea for differentiation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Deicide4u said:

Not a spear, a pilum. They threw pila at the enemy, before engaging in melee combat. 

Unfortunately, 0 A. D. still has no way for units to use multiple attacks, so the Hastatus is melee only. If we get to have units with multiple attacks, the plan is for Advanced and Elite Hastati to throw pila first, then engage in melee.

https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/wiki/Civ_Romans_Republican

I'm just going off wiki, and it doesnt say pilum, it says spear :)

You can have units switch between the two, like persian imortals.... and in historical A LOT of units.  We did it with Rome Legionaries.

7 hours ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said:

This answers it for you (the whole video is good)

 

 

I will definitely watch! These are the types of videos I like and find quite useful.  Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said:

This answers it for you (the whole video is good)

 

 

ha at the 5 minute mark it even says they are called Hastāti, derived from the roman word for spear :) But yes im sure there is more and it will go on.

I guess it kinda comes down to what years of Romes existence is 0AD focusing on.  Early republic their infantry were more like Greek Hoplites.  

Edited by Emacz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said:

This answers it for you (the whole video is good)

 

 

now that ive fully watched it I have this bold idea for Rome in historical:
 p4 represents the empire phase, p1 could be early republic…. Remove swordsmen from p1…they have a regular spearman, poor stone thrower who will have “serf” stats even though not a serf per se and the velites. P2 the spearman is replaced by the swordsman. And they gain access to an elite spearman (similar to Sparta skiri). They no longer have access to the regular spearman though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...