Genava55

So let the women built the homes where they will spend the rest of their lives (joke)

You can garrison the citizen in the house to unblock him.

Agrianes have been confused by ancient authors as Thracians, so maybe some thracian cape for the basic version could be useful. Moreover, Agrianes are Paeonians, and it seems that Paeonians used some illyrian helmets according to their coins: https://www.cgbfr.com/peonie-royaume-de-peonie-patraos-tetradrachme-sup-ttb-,bgr_469398,a.html So why not a mixture of pilos, thracian and illyrian helmets for the elite version?

There are also a statue of Marsyas the satyr/silenus close to the subsellium and Columna Maenia, a statue of Publius Horatius Cocles and a Vulcanal (shrine of Vulcan) both close to the Lapis Niger. Bonus:

Basically, you already have understand the main points. To sum it up, the Rome's Comitium was rectangular until around 300 BC when it got circular stands/bleachers. Sadly, the stratigraphical record is difficult to interpret and the Comitium has been destroyed and rebuilt by Sylla in the 1st century BC. So the historians rely on the changes occurring in the Roman colonies to get hints about the date of its changes. Circular Comitium in colonized cities give a range of possible dates for the adoption of this architectural characteristic, like Cosa (273 BC), Paestum (273 BC), Alba Fucens (303 BC) and Fregellae (328 BC although debated). The author of the linked chapter suggests a narrow range by including the moment when Pythagorean ideas reach Rome and the tribes reforms by Appius Claudius in 312 BC. The two pictures you choose are the Comitium of Cosa and of Paestum. Here, from another publications, the Comitium from Alba Fucens and Fregellae. However, the historical representations of the second century BC Comitium in Rome, is a bit simpler: The Rome's Comitium is associated with the Graecostasis, Columna Maenia, Rostra Vetera and the lapis niger. Statues of Pythagore and Alcibiade are also mentioned.

This is mostly based on the Anabasis of Xenophon. He said that rhodian slingers reach the double than the Persian slingers and even more than most of the Persian bows.

Only with lead bullets.

Outside some clear issues as the slingers efficient against structure and lance cavalry against infantry, how battalions will fit in this? In the long term, if it will be implanted, this framework won't survive.

Gauls fighting on a Pergamon relief Reenactors, offensive techniques with the shield

Oh yes, I wasn't suggesting this necessarily. I think the Scythians and the Parthians should be in, but the indo-scythians and indo-parthians are only little different so probably not a priority.

Another shield is good enough. Both Gauls and Britons have their own shields now, even medium ones. The others possibilities are symbols painted and wooden figures, animal and human heads, weapons (spears notably) etc. It is up to the artists because nothing is really settled on this matter. There are evidence for painted walls. There are evidences for wooden figures against walls (as in Manching), for human heads and weapons as trophee. But the context is lacking.

Only arrowheads have been found. Bows are almost impossible to conserve in temperate soils. There are few native representations of bows, like in the Bellovaci coins, and it suggests a normal bow, not a composite one.

Capitole Capitole, suite: Etruscan architecture in spanish: https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/llibres/1886-1897/56958/hisgenart_a1901t2r8.pdf Etruscan temple of Jupiter Others: Other high res downloaded from uni:

I think there are a few useful things there:

https://www.pinterest.ch/pin/7881368075448587/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultanate_of_Bagirmi

Indeed. Evidences from different era and cultures point in the direction of one piece armour in fabric. https://journals.openedition.org/cy/3293

Mound burials and tumuli come from the neolithic. Saint-Michel tumulus in France is dated from the 5th millennium BC for example. The White Monument in the plain Tell Banat in Syria is an example from the third millennium Early Bronze Age tumulus, simultaneous of the oldest pyramid in Egypt.

Anyone knows from where come this helmet? I found some evidences that could be useful. I found this number 21 below, the other ones are all labeled "Scythian" and this one is labeled Achaemenid, without specifying the reason. I don't find anything about an example in the "Glasgow Museum". It looks close the number 18 although. There is also this helmet found in Olympia attributed to the Medians:

About the Sogdians, here some short accounts of their interaction against Alexander's armies. Ethnic background (useful description pages 442 to 444) Increasing nomads later in the region

I was speaking more on a historical perspective. The complete annihilation of an army only with the help of missile troops was very rare and required a huge numerical superiority over the infantrymen (Battle of Sphacteria, and of Lechaeum). Rock/Scissor/Paper system exists only in the video games and in war games. Missile troops are mainly a support (and a very efficient support).

That's true. And Vegetius wrote in his treatise that slingers are more annoying for infantry than the archers. Generally, missile troops have a supportive and defensive role, slowing down the enemy, preventing a flank attack, preventing cavalry charge, disrupting battle formations etc. etc.

There are slingers and slingers. Rhodians, Balearics, Acarnanians were prized mercenaries. Lead bullets are deadly, this is why the Roman army used it until the end.