Atrik

Yes in => https://wildfiregames.com/forum/forum/448-delenda-est/

An enemy already cannot hold a sentry tower in your territory, unless putting hero or champs inside, the tower will decay and return to you. So basically the only way to please you in this case would be to increase building decay. In previous alphas, towers with 5 guys inside almost couldn't ever be captured. But that worked both ways. And it was silly. A garrisoned tower in your territory could not be captured unless a very unreasonable effort was made to do so by your opponent, but if ever he did capture it (for example you forgot to garrison it and enemy took it), you would never get it back unless you ram it down first. Since so much players have a hard time managing to defend their buildings, I would have suggested to do something that increase capture point, instead of capture regeneration. It's very different because increasing capture point is only slowing the capturing of buildings, while capture regeneration have a exponential effect that leads into buildings being not capturable. Here are some ideas as a middle ground: Sentry (Tower tech) => +50% arrows and +50% capture points for towers Professional Garrison (Fort tech) => +100% arrows and +100% capture points for forts CCs 2500 => 3000 base capture points. I've saw so much capture CC fails this alpha I don't know why some players still think buildings are too easy to capture. It's just different as you need to garrison it with best units and protect your CC more then using it as if it was actually a fort.

A tower cost 200 resources, same as 2 infantry, we'll take account build time and say 3 infantry... Considering this, you can see why building a tower SHOULDNT be too strong as to for the enemy spend excessive time to take it out. When the building balance is making buildings too strong, then game stalls and it's boring. Which is why this alpha (a27) is refreshing because building are balanced. We can make the same comparison we did with towers with other buildings like CC and forts both as costly as 9 infantry. Yet a CC even being easier to capture now can score 80 kills as I often witness in games, and forts even more (100 not being uncommon even saw 169 once). The towers enemy capture in your own territory, decay 10 capture point/sec iirc, so recapturing them is actually much more at the advantage of the original owner. Next alpha, CC and forts will be back at being almost impossible to capture, which I regret because it will close strategic options, forcing players to always go for rams, even when you only need to defeat a naked CC. But I guess the majority of people think that's how it should be..

A small annoyance is also the inability to close console with the associated hotkey if it's printable character. Comparing with a27 it did work there.

Just check the link https://releases.wildfiregames.com/rc/ , download for your os, now linux have a appimage so you don't need to do anything fancy. RIP you, market got fixed, you'll need to find another exploit.

Thanks! I will. Right now I'm noticing that formations got much worse in r28. They were already very buggy before, so these new bugs will really be frustrating. I'll try help on this first as it might still be time for bug fixs for r28.

No, same reason as @ffm2, and no entity get spawned. Just test it lol. Not sure how that happened, its not supposed to be like that. Random guess would be that the Carth stone tech get applied to all civs in p1. That is intentional, as the tech turns them into 5 pop houses. But you couldn't train females from them afterward iirc. It seemed a bit odd. Other proprieties of houses are likely to be applied to the wagon that might cause game-play weirdness.

I know nothing about this stuff but my first guess would be that you named something with a too long or invalid name.

I'd like to revisit the code a bit. It needs polishing in any cases but I might also make improvements. Since apparently it's too late to get anything into r28, I'll rather give it the time. I'd love to have your help and views on it! Especially since you seems to be very proefficient on performance implications, and UX in general (here is an opportunity to thank you for your work on 0ad too ). I'm still learning the review/git process so I don't understand what you have in mind here, as I also haven't went through a merged PR.

I think you might have to do something like this : Add a "submarine" section in there pathfinder.xml with a nonrestrictive "shore distance". Handle it in BuildRestrictions (maybe also some stuff here Templates.js). Then you should be able to add <PlacementType>submarine</PlacementType> in <BuildRestrictions> in templates. Don't forget to fix petra too!

Assuming the RC is same as release 0.28 git branch : Germans are now unplayable Stone gather rates is almost doubled compared to xml template for seemingly all units Last known bug for Germans i noticed and don't think got fixed (can't check cause can't play them): Fertility festival and loom become available in wagons after researching Migratory Resettlement. Don't think that is intentional.

My bad, the @manowar config tip for lfs works for me, I also had to run git remote remove origin

Ah! I missed that thread. I have a similar problem (still today). Can't update my fork. ssh -T git@gitea.wildfiregames.comSSH Says hi, but then it ask me for https authentication in a loop. No error, nothing, just keep asking credentials. I've tried a lot of different things as I though I was doing something wrong but no success here yet.

I ran into a disk failure, probably, the error was NOT related, however after restoring everything I've then been able to compile. Something was very probably outdated but I don't think it was the compiler since I tried both clang and gcc, clang had at least the most recent version and gcc was 12.x Now using gcc 13.3.0 It works seamlessly. Thanks.

Thanks, so what I've tried now is : ./update-workspaces.sh --cc=gcc-12 cd gcc make And ./update-workspaces.sh --cc=clang-18 cd gcc #Can't see any other folders make If i pass a compiler version i don't have to update-workspaces.sh, it tell me so. Therefor I'm guessing i do have to compiler I'm passing above. Yet compilation fails in both cases. With gcc /usr/include/fmt/core.h:2201:22: error: ‘constexpr void fmt::v8::basic_format_parse_context<Char, ErrorHandler>::on_error(const char*) [with Char = char; ErrorHandler = fmt::v8::detail::error_handler]’ called in a constant expression 2201 | context_.on_error(message); With clang In file included from ../../../source/ps/GameSetup/GameSetup.cpp:84: ../../../source/scriptinterface/FunctionWrapper.h:518:6: error: call to consteval function 'fmt::basic_format_string<char, std::basic_string<char> &>::basic_format_string<char[51], 0>' is not a constant expression 518 | "Failed defining function {:?} on the native scope.", classInfo->name)}; | ^