vinme

yes, personal emotion, ie you have emotional bias, and spew bullshit malicious nonsense with "polite" pretend undertone, to try and discredit me. Id say for a fact, that would be very well defined as "lasing out" so yes, you are lashing out. unhinged pargraphs? what part did you find unhinged, please give at least 1 example, given you accuse me of writing many paragraphs, this task should be very simple, but ofc its not, given you have 0 basis for your pointing and sputtering. you shouldve gotten more screenshots to convince people of what exactly? im sure there are people who were specs, whod confirm what happened, and i assume you wont accuse me of denying anything that happened, that did happen. im just ranting at people? every sentence i write has a point, and i dont get derailed to unrelated subjects, there is no "Rant" there you go again @BreakfastBurrito_007 again with another empty insult for the thousandth time, 0 self respect clearly. the reason i got kicked, was becuase woodpecker was being unreasonable, for whatever reason. do you want people, to put up with cheating, yours and other peoples shameful behaviour, in relation to me simply opposing cheating, saying things like "just dont worry about it" or "you are overreacting" , "its just a game" ruins the game, people who actively promote in this manner, cheating, and help cheaters, dont deserve any respect whatsoever and are not to be taken seriously. the host was the only one who decided, to kick me, there was NO discussion among players, the spectators of course are irrelevant given they had no right to decide what us players should do, but they also didnt side with said, at all whatsoever. again another accusation, its tiresome, but id rather reply to this nonsense, to avoid someone, who is just skimming and not putting effort into looking at details, to misinterpret you or what you write as in any way reasonable, polite, legitimate or respectable. its rare for a person to have 90% of what they say/write come out as pure manipulative virtue signalling bs,i guess thats some sick form of accomplishment in a sense to be so motivated by unhinged emotion almost all that you say is wrong, and no this isnt an insult, its my opinion that i fully believe in, 90% of what you say is total bs.

this time i was in @Rockss tg host, and saidrdz joined, i ask rocks to specify no dance, rule to which he agreed, and he stated "no dancing allowed". afterwards said said he would dance, planned to dance in that game intentionally. then they talked in spanish i believe, after which some time passed and said still hadn't agreed to not dancing. i dont like rocks who refused to remove him, instead repeatedly asking me to "please start, its just a game" etc, instead of asking said "please dont dance, its just a game" im sure he did so because said was his friend, so hed rather side with him, and proliferate cheating, disrespect a player who doesnt cheat by removing him. Acero also tried to pretend there was any discussion to be had on this obvious matter of not allowing cheating players in games. he said something along the lines of "i think we must reach a reasonable compromise, we are all reasonable people here after all" "you need to see things from other peoples perspective" or "you are arrogant, you are so sure of youself" etc, playing with words to sound fake polite while spewing bs, i asked what saidrdz's side was, to which he replied something like "maybe he doesnt think dance is cheating" which i quickly debunked obviously, with game history of how turnrate slowing was implemented in a24, to counter dance, and even after it caused issues, it only was somewhat reduced, still not to same extent as a23 though.how we all agreed, over years to make dance not allowed, as it was rampant in early years and its undeniable for anyone who has played vs dance, it makes game worse, repettetive, boring, with power of dance abuse forcing all to dance. i think people just dont care, theyd allow host to remove me, over a cheating player. so i got removed from the tg for not readying,because player admitted to wanting to cheat. to whoever has finished reading my post, please post below, if you think dancing is acceptable, and if so why.

meh, every player has been accused of ddos at this point, as for insults? i reall calling him stupid for being unreasonable, and no, calling som1 a jerk, stupid etc for acting the way he did, isnt comparable to cheating, or to waht he did, not even close. the timing is pretty convenient tho, maybe som1 wanted to bring blame on me, that seems likely. id imagine that game was guranteed loss, albeit we did destroy our side completely (me and wally), our other side was saying they were losing, from what i recall, so i presumed removing me at that point would cause guranteed end) honestly i dont think any1 shouldve been kicked, but if anyone did have to be kicked only obvious option is saidrdz. i dont see why woodpecker would kick me, except just stupidity. i never hinted id take "Action"(whatever that means) against the host player now you are just full of shlt. what overreaction? verbally confront? lel thats a pretty stupid way to word it. "insult" is an arbitrary concept, it can be considered an insult to be kicked from a game you wasted 10-20 min or so on, for 0 reason, it can be considered an insult when your opponent cheats, etc. i only had a problem with said and woodpeck, not other players playing the tg. if he just wanted a new game hed have ended, instead of kicking me. at the end of your comment, accusing me of ddos,with 0 proof except mere correlation just removes any legitimacy from whatever you say, not that your wordings didnt already do it mostly before then @BreakfastBurrito_007. Its interesting how slight intentional changes in context, and the way the narrative is organized, really cahnges the message and implications, you would be a great journalist on some rich guys payroll to spew propaganda emotional stupid ppl would eat up @BreakfastBurrito_007 i dont like when people act polite but passively malevolent, i think we can all agree its a thousand times worse than being outright "rude". "EveRYOne would agree" that my 1.overreaction(didnt overreact), 2.insults to hosts and other players(anything that can possibly be intrpreted as an insult would merely be adressed at said and woodpeck not other players, so again, full of @#$%) 3.ddosattacks(what does this have to do with me, why bunch it in so conveniently, into other things you relate to me, very disgusting). so yeah, just totally full of @#$%. this clears up nothing for anyone reading, the whole post is full of agenda and persinal emotion. if people gave less respect to politely sounding people, or people pretending to be civilized the world would be a less disgusting place.

last few seconds, of whole game, is the dancing, maybe it happened b4 also, idk. he couldnt beat archer cav, so he start dancing, i pause and tell him to stop he replies somethign like "no XD" then some stupid ppl saiyng "just unpause" etc. ofc no point continuing game if enemy cheats. then i ask again, he say "stop hit and run" implying archer cav somehow remotely equivalent to dancing. etc, just stupid ppl being unreasonable and impatient, and instead of kicking saidrdz, woodpecker kicks me(instnatly ending game ofc, becuase balance ruined). anyway just wanted to post the humiliation, hope this causes total loss or respect for salty players who get bitter over losing and start cheating over it, then make absurd excuses as to why they did it. also wanna note how stupid and incapable of reasoning ppl can be, instead of understanding he cheated, and ending game after he refused to stop, baning him from future games, theyd rather ignore it, they are as responsible as the cheater, for being stubbornly blind to circumstace. Dont complain when game is shlt with cheating players, etc when you cant follow common sense of not allwoing cheaters to get away with it. funny thing is, they ALWAYS start cheating when losing and never cheat when winning, this is another undeniable proof they comprehend that its cheating, obviously, and use it when getting desprate/frustrated, like a kid throwing a temper tantrum instead of admitting they lost, as if cheating will somehow qualify a win, which obv it doesnt, it auto qualifies loss. metadata.json commands.txt

lol of all the unimportant things to note with the list of issues in 0AD XD.

"Crocodiles have an important role in the environment. As adults they regulate the populations of other animals – stopping them from overcrowding and degrading ecosystems. Crocodiles also create habitats for other animals by burrowing and nest building. During the dry season, the presence of crocodiles deters land animals from using and drinking the limited water supplies. This protects aquatic life and systems. Protecting and restoring crocodile habitats benefits people by creating clean water supplies and healthy fish supplies." also favourite animal of world chess champion Magnus Carlsen

im certain world wouldnt be better without crocodiles, surely theres some butterfly effect that would totally decimate many ecosystems similar to how wolves going extinct/getting hunted down in some areas caused creation of deserts via herbivorous animals like deer totally decimating the local flora. https://www.worldanimalprotection.org.uk/blogs/amazing-animals-compelling-crocodiles1

ofc i dont have screenshot. ddoser cant know u are online, even if he knows ur OGname and ip, as long as you use alt acc, becuase rn IP cant be read through lobby, one must join a game to read ip of ppl in that game, pretty sure this was in the a25 info i read when it came out, as a solution to ddos apparently. so as long as he wont join your new account, in a game should be safe. also as long as he cant just randomly ddos known ppl ips, see who disconnects, and identify alts based on that, but this shouldnt be reliable, and will require manual labor, not something a program could do reliably becuase its not clear cut when the ddos jams the connection, and when this causes the disconnect, som1 might just be leaving lobby coincidentally, even in this case, just making a new alt, should suffice if old one gets compromised. well if worse comes, we can host off lobby right? idk how it works but cant be hard.

got ddosed 4x today, in a row, even got ddosed, b4 even starting a game, after planning to make an alt acc, and saying this in lobby(so as to avoid ddos, since his program, or he himself cant connect ip with in lobby, player). also read some stuff from lobby, about game crashing issue, prob ddos i assumed.

why cut the cables instead of removing them? or are they screwed in or glued in or something? why would anyone do that? probably accidental removal prevention.

i skimmed through that mapsize link, couldnt find answer, maybe i missed it idk. hyperion, how do you know that? could you tell me small/med ?

ty

that is all

many good things, many bad things in 0ad, for one huge example, brokenness of pto that seems to be increasing instead of decreasing, removal of stoas from athen and sparta, for smaller example merc cav slightly too cheap(ik its fixed a26 ive been told), jav inf are way too slow in relation to slings, merely 5% faster(if its 7-8% would be much better) archers are considered too weak ofc, but i changed my mind on this with the way sniping is now the new meta, which totally transforms the way the game is played, towards the better giving unique qualities to all units. the ease of defending with longer ranged unit when near cc, baracs, closed or cluttered landscape, and advantage it has when played properly totally makes archers completely fine, especially the boost in value later on in game with 20% spread tech becoming cheap as game progresses, with mapcontroll play and in again, closed areas. yes archers weak in direct fights, but all archer civs have some other ways of gameplay, without relying purely on archers dps. OP complete denial of inferior range cavalry harass play if spear+archer with proper reaction time and army composition. huge denial of enemy small count cav mobility around your base, etc.

a25 selecting enemy units i think is a rly bad idea, itll ruin part of game which is randomness/esimtating enemy forces. wasnt distorting enemys perception of your forces a thing historically? making differing formations to show an illusion of greater or lesser numbers. 501 doesnt always beat 499, in such numbers especially, randomness will be huge prob nearly 50/50 wins. because of pathfinding, and fundamental randomness of engage, fights will always vary insanely. you cant ever get rid of luck, without getting rid of interesting aspects of the game, which is open systems, not based in concrete, known or predictable paradigms. This is what makes 0ad interesting and allows for infinite improvement and options. in even game, one side gets some tiny advnatage from luck, and has to capitalize on it since if popcap is hit, any small advantage diminishes. Therefore luck creates scenarios and variability thatll bring out unique landscapes of competition, and it evens out eventually, over many games, everyone getting even random advantages/disadvantages.

because units overlap with eachother, so 4 may almost look like one.

he starts sending ton of tribute, i had to pause so messages are visible(already gg, ofc) i tell him to resign, he says "im leaving bye" and abandons. then he says in general chat that he resigned, while im afk(writing this). i ended game, alegedly he resigned, then he wont give points ofc(no point transfer since i ended) stupid way to abandon game and pretend it wasnt his fault, ofc wont give points after either. heres replay, and screenshots. commands.txt metadata.json

reduce cost of persian hall to 200 metal/200 stone and 200 buildtime, idk why its so expensive for no reason whatsoever(rn 300 stone 200 metal 300 buildtime)

i changed my mind, 15% move speed for all 15% dmg for cav hero, too op, then 20% dmg for cav hero wont be as viable. maybe 15% move speed for all, 10% dmg for cav? that seems reasonable. also removing the immortals tech debuff, of 10% less hp 50% less traintime.

i have recently started using persia, its not as weak as one would think, but very hard to play properly. id advise perhaps p2 10% food tech. make cc archer range tech cheaper maybe 300/150 over 400/200 food/metal. decrease atack, increas armor of citizen spearmen? so just pikes? with no hack armor? thats a bad idea. make the traintime -10% 300 food for cav tech into 20% less traintime. give better hero, instead of only cav hero, provide 15% move speed one maybe 15% dmg for cav. bow women too extreme, would change game completely, i dont like it. archer rank advance seems boring, given rn archers weak af, unless you mean cav archers as well, then interesting. accuracy boost for archers? maybe civ passive 10% less spread? all persian cav from cc can be interesting, but changes game too much still i feel, maybe all can come from special stable, that has limit of 2?(normal stables avalible also) cav hp to p1? maybe instead, do the "nisean war horse" tech p1, affects all mele cav,as long as you dont give swordcav to persia, this way could work, but make it expensive, 600-800 food perhaps. (20%+hp for mele cav but 10% more traintime)

on the internet, saying "i ate a @#$% meal" or somethign shouldnt be banable offense, if it is then there have to be mods who review the bans, and thats tiresome and costly for no reason. better question to as is, what does this muting provide? what value does it bring? and the answer is, absolutely none, its simply a nuisance. i understand banning ppl who spam, threaten others but those never get banned, but i say "o@#$%" instead of count and i cant properly organize games for 2 days.

everyone knows not to say the xyz words, changing 1 letter easily prevents mute, so nothing is actually being censored. its always a typo that causes the mute, or forgeting to self censor, almost never som1 who is insulting people. like i tried writing "count", mistyped "o@#$%" and it muted me, mute lasts for too long as well. its already a pain trying to join games 100 times for it to work, when getting muted its even more tiresome.

idk what happened on other side wasnt paying much attention but my side was interesting. metadata.json commands.txt

even more drastic, thats slight longer build and slight tankiness. im talking +3-5 crush at least and maybe 2x buildtime. altho this would deincentivize larger coverage of area walling. swords work great vs rams, many other units work ok too, rams are too weak rn if anything, compared to ele especially, but in general also.

stone walls arent that expensive, depends on what you are walling off. buildtime is so tiny, its neglegent, you may even build them easily in time if you see enemy coming, the question is really what you want to wall off, of course walling off completely farms and cc will be costly, but not a 1 by 1 walloff of cc itself, or a castle, or even a front wall to block off castle/towers from ease of access. Honestly since the scenarios of legitimate use are quite rare, people dont even use them when tehy are useful, myself included. Id like if they were moderately tankier, and moderately harder to build(buildtime)