Jump to content

Dakara

Community Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    364

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Dakara

  2. Gameplay issue: Booming = Turtling

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    22 minutes ago, Thorfinn the Shallow Minded said:

    I'll say it quite simply.  All melee units should counter rams.  Making spears, swords, pikes, and other types of weapons have dramatically different stats in terms of their efficiency of taking down rams is frankly rubbish.  

    There should not be an elaborate meta built around who can dismantle the most simplistic siege weaponry.

    a lot of melee unit kill ram at A24.

    we can make a version of weak ram for A24 (only for kill a embryon player after good rush or his tower)

  7. Who need stones ?

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    Concerning myself, I often manage to find a use in stone.
    Temple, Tower, Fort, Wall or at worst sell it. Besides, I find the selling prices of resources far too high for the first to use the market, at least it motivates people to pass the age since there is no more bonus when passing the age.

    But it is true that for the common people the stone is useful only in small quantities.

    Either we solve the problem or we don't (we buff the metal)

    Resolution problem

    Make civ more stone dependant but care to don't slow people for phase 3. But HOW?

    Castel cost : +100 STONE

    Center-Civc : Convert half metal cost to stone.

    All tower +50 stone cost (iberians 250 to 300- orther civ 100 to 150)

    Maurya wall : make stone cost to maurya wall ? or it not realistic history? in any cast up the cost of wood because too op only defend with wood.

     

    Don't forget temple cost for a lot of civ 300 stone, and it good.

    I don't know if just increasing the cost of buildings would be a good thing though. Going back to the stone cost of technology would be okay, but the stone dependent civ would be a nerf.

    For end a funny idea: Make Road in all ally / neutral territory with only stone, unit and trade speed move + 25% on road lol

    Buff Metal 

    New tech in warehouse :

    "Efficient Mining" This tech cost 200 stone and 200 wood 1 min research .  She give +100% lootable ressourcesd +

    To buff the metal: New tech in the warehouse: "Efficient mining". This tech costs 200 stone 200 wood 1min research + 100% lousy resources (metal and stone). This means with 100 of metal you can harvest 200. This way less deadlock at the end of the game due to lack of metal. .

  10. Unused Building Balancing Ideas

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    Hello,

    I'm totaly agree with Edwarf. We need give more interest to all useless building. 

    WONDER :First delete the tech for bonus population and replace with a bonus linked to civilization once the wonder is built. A bonus military. 

    Tech proposed by Edwarf sound good too. For a medium cost like 400 FOOD 200 METAL for the tech "Reduce all unit cost", look absoluty neccessary for spam champ and 400 FOOD 200STONE for tech "Reduce all building cost".

    We can by this way give a strength to civilisation by this way. 

    Below the bonus by civ: TO ADAPT 

    Athens : Spear Infantery +25% HP / +1 Range Attack 

    Brits : Slingers +2 armor pierce + 8% speed attack

    Carthage : Mercenaries  damage +20% et 10 HP / Spear +1 pierce armor 

    Gauls : Looting unit +100% and Cav +15% attack speed

    Iberians : Skimish +2 armor pierce +1 orther armor and Infantery +5 HP

    Kushite : Monk +30 HP +2 Heal, Infantery +5% move speed

    Macedonians : Cav Melee +20 HP / Siege Weapons +20% HP +1 Hack Armor / Crossbow +10 Range attack +5 move speed.

    Mauryas : Elefant training time -50% / Elefant +3 % HP 

    Persians : Immortal +20 HP + 20% Damage +10% move speed / Les unités infantery melee rang 3 deviennent des Immortal

    Ptol : Piques +1 hack damage +1 range attack +1 move speed

    Rome : Sword infantery +50% damage / Heroes +500HP

    Spartans : Melee Units +10% Move Speed + 10% Speed attack +15% move speed / Ram +20% HP

    Seleucids :  Cav +10% Move speed +10 HP +2 Attack range

    it also good if ennemy can know you have WONDER. They take fear.  If you agree how to implement this? The list of players in a card dashboard that has a wonder? in the diplomacy menu a wonder icon?

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

  11. Suggestions for 0 A.D.

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    On 13/07/2004 at 2:24 AM, phantom_rider2 said:

    Diplomacy should be more then just "Ally, Neutral, or Enemy."

    Maybe involve trading units as well as resources and maybe even territories, etc (like what I read about EE2, it has about everything as a possible trade).

    Give unit to ally sould be good ! 

    • Like 1

  15. RANKED TG

    in Announcements / News

    Posted · Edited by Dakara

    On 21/02/2021 at 7:16 PM, kangz said:

    There could be two seperate ranks ? One for 1v1 and one for TG ? But I also agree TG ranking should use more than win/loss to get established, like the KD; eco and so on... or we need a OP AI to analyze the game ^^

    nop wtf

    just avoid people leaver or lager but no rule plz 

  20. Let's Fight - Gameplay Balance Mod

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    Hello,

    We don't need to emulate Age of Empire bonuses to have a healthy and fun game. Some basic principles can be applied. Perhaps we can take inspiration from total war.

    Review the armor values of each type of unit and create a new unit. 

    HEAVY INFANTERY (SWORD WITH SHIELD, SPEAR INFANTERY, PIKEMEN)

    LIGHT INFANTERY (SWORD WITHOUT SHIELD, AXEMAN WITHOUT SHIELD, PILLAGER (loot X 2) , IMAGINE MORE UNITS IN THIS CATEGORY ?)

    ARCHERS/SLINGERS

    SKIRMISH

    CAVALERY/CHARIOT

    CHAMPION (SAME ORTHER CATEGORY BUT MORE ARMOR AND ATTACK THANK TO QUALITY EQUIPMENT)

    ELEFANT

     

    Archers/Slingers without a shield must have 0 armor. Trash support unit. They did good dammage at unit without armor and shield-> Natural counter of archers and slingers and all units without shield. Not to mention their ability to keep enemies away thanks to their range. They are not hard counter cavalery but they did dammage where orther units without range can do dammage. I would like to insist that unprotected archers should be demolished in melee as no armor and difficult to shoot at very low range.

    I like spear cav. They did good damage at orther cav and it really good ! They are very useful in their role.

    For skirmish more armor against arrow and agility (they run more fast archer and heavy infantery). Why not make it a harass unit. Low speed attack rate but big dammage. 25% more dammage against infantery melee. Attack and run. Easy killed by cavalery and useful against infantery melee. Balance against archer beacause low range and armor good against arrow.

    Spear infantery is good. They tank a bit but not tooo much. They sould speed run as sword with shield. They sould destroy all cavalery and ranged at melee fight. Maybe they lack dammage in late game against cavalery. 

    Pikemen should be very tanky slow. They sould destroy all cavalery and ranged at melee fight. They can also block ennemy unit with big range melee attack.

    Sword with shield have more armor because they have shield. They already did good dammage at building so it ok. Maybe more dammage against melee infantery.  1 vs 1 they win against pikemen and spear infantery but not too fast. 

    New unit for some civ ,maybe 2 or 3. Light infantery, sword or axe without shield and little amount of armor. and very low armor vs arrow. Fabric or leather garment. Good run speed. And a bit more dammage on building than sword with shield. 

     

     

    Also, for a slight differentiation of civilizations we can imagine that the Carthaginian archers have a shield (already present in their appearance) and benefit from a little overall armor, and reduce their range from 5 to 10 meters to balance. For one orther civ, skirmish without shield : no armor but +5 range and +1 movespeed + 1 dammage?

     

     

    And please after this change, if neccessary more hp to unit. it very fun to have fight little more long. Maybe 15-20% hp ?

     

    Thanks for reading

     

     

     


     

    • Like 1

  24. Suggestions for 0 A.D.

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    On 17/03/2021 at 00:19, Genava55 said:

    Ce serait bien de construire tout un concept autour des mercenaires. Actuellement, les quelques mercenaires en jeu sont liés à la civ / faction, à l'arbre militaire. Par exemple, les archers Scythes pour les Athéniens et les Thraces pour les Macédoniens.

    Mais ce serait vraiment cool d'avoir des mercenaires liés à la carte. Juste une idée rapide, la carte pourrait avoir des paramètres pour un environnement mercenaire, une sorte de `` biome mercenaire '' donnant un ensemble d'unités dans lesquelles tous les joueurs du jeu en cours pourraient recruter. Par exemple, une carte avec la flore méditerranéenne pourrait avoir aussi un ensemble méditerranéen de mercenaires disponibles, avec des italiques, des ibères, des crétois, des numides etc. Elle pourrait être large (Méditerranée, Asie, Europe centrale etc.), spécifique (péninsule italienne, Anatolie, Grèce etc.) ou aléatoire pour le plaisir.

    De toute évidence, ce serait cool et apporterait beaucoup d'unités diverses avec une esthétique différente. Et les gens aiment ce genre de choses. Mais je pense qu'il y a des arguments encore plus rationnels pour cela.

    • Tout d'abord, il peut apporter un équilibre entre les civs sans apporter ses frères sombres apparentés, la monotonie et l'homogénéité. Cela peut apporter un équilibre parce que certaines civs ont historiquement un manque d'unités dans certaines zones, et il est donc difficile d'équilibrer ces civs dans diverses situations. Par exemple, les unités navales, c'est vraiment un gros problème pour certaines civilisations. Mais si toutes les civilisations ont accès à une variété d'unités navales via des mercenaires sur les cartes navales, les joueurs commencent à envisager un plus large éventail de civilisations lorsqu'ils jouent sur ces cartes. Evidemment, je ne propose pas de rendre toutes les civs identiques en ce qui concerne leurs faiblesses et leurs forces, les mercenaires devraient avoir une contrepartie, une pénalité (prix, nombre limité ou / et autre chose). De plus, certaines civilisations pourraient avoir quelques technologies uniques liées aux mercenaires (comme Carthage pourrait en avoir par exemple).Il s'agit simplement d'éliminer un angle mort entier. Parce qu'il y a une énorme différence entre une civilisation avec une marine faible et une civilisation totalement inutile dans ce domaine.
    • Deuxième aspect, cela donnerait plus de lumière à d'autres cultures intéressantes et / ou appréciées de tous mais non prévues dans la feuille de route du jeu. Surtout dans le cas où 0AD n'ajoute pas facilement une douzaine de factions, cela serait apprécié par les moddeurs et les personnes faisant des campagnes historiques dans le futur. Samnites, Thraces, Allemands, Cantabres, Lusitaniens, Numides, Scythes, Rhétiques, Illyriens et une douzaine de personnes plus intéressantes.
    • Enfin, c'est un concept flexible qui peut être facilement adapté au jeu. Il peut s'agir d'entités gaia sur la carte à capturer pour avoir la possibilité de recruter des mercenaires (je pense que Delenda Est le fait) mais cela pourrait aussi être directement à partir d'un bâtiment que chaque civ possède (une ambassade par exemple). Ou encore plus paresseux, du marché. Pour ne pas faire des mercenaires l'équivalent de la liste commune, il existe de nombreuses possibilités pour ajouter des aspects négatifs les nerf, avec l'idée de trouver le juste milieu.

     

    explore + warcraft 3 style ? 

    • Haha 1

  25. Event Notifications

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    On 13/03/2021 at 11:03, Dragonoar said:

    J'ai posté quelque chose comme ça sur le fil de suggestion, mais après y avoir réfléchi, je ne suis pas sûr que les gens ne le trouveraient pas ennuyeux, surtout en fin de partie avec des tonnes de bâtiments et d'unités.

    prf5.png.e3eac16e45c8930b5ff64e3856519393.png

    Why not 2 windows : 1 for units and 1 window for building, tech etc 

×
×
  • Create New...