Lion.Kanzen

you would have to do that patch with several hellenistic civs.

I have thought that their have a melee attack and their standard attack(range). The armor thing makes a lot of sense, it will be the opposite of AOE.

They are missing colored ( player) props.

Mix both can work. if it depends on an artificial intelligence that receives and mixes all this data, in the long run it could be that we do use the same tags and represent the game.

I like the skill is very discreet. could fit here.

I'm talking about Alexander hero icon.

they should be less obvious with copyrighted material. There is an Alexander who is Collin Farrell.

I did a cavalry but they said it was horrible. That doesn't help wanting to make icons. I withdraw from that.

no, that's fine by dafault infantry.

or a single with perspective to the camera.

recommendation with weapons for example like pikes it is best to use a composition or an abstracted(this means that it was removed from a small detail) detail.

What is the difference in the role of chariots vs horse archers? In AOE one costs metal and the other is trash unit. In 0 A.D we already have trash units that do that in cavalry. https://ageofempires.fandom.com/wiki/Horse_Archer_(Age_of_Empires) May be anti support anti healers and villager. In AoE role: ""The Chariot Archer is a popular Bronze Age unit because of its combined speed, strength, range of attack, and the fact that it costs no gold, which makes it a so-called trash unit. Its speed allows it to fly right past towers and catch Villagers quickly. It possesses 7 range, allowing it to find exposed units or for reconnaissance. As it is fast and has good range, it is strong in numbers."" ----

This but with Tom's voice I don't know who else presenting the new features, the new content and announcements.

https://youtu.be/Zm0LjUBZyUY

her with... a solar crown.

many primitive nations made the brave warriors of spain and portugal to run in that era. @AIEND

is not an unanswerable question. I answered it myself. is to justify some solar ornament on Himiko's head.

who is Amateratsu?

Hime (Old Japanese Pi1me1), (姫, "young noblewoman; princess"), explains Miller, etymologically derives from hi (Fi1) (日, "sun") and me (me1) (女, "woman"). Tsunoda[35] notes that "Pimiko is from an archaic Japanese title, himeko, meaning 'princess'"; that is, hime with the female name suffix -ko (子, "child"), viz. the uncommon given name Himeko. Other Amaterasu-related etymological proposals for the Japanese name Himiko involve hi (日, "sun") and miko (覡 or 巫女, "female shaman, shamaness; shrine maiden; priestess"); or their combination hime-miko, "princess-priestess".[citation needed] Bentley[36] considers the Baekje word *pye, 'west', the honorific prefix *me and *hɔ, 'heir', and thus interprets 卑彌呼 as 'the honorific heir of the west'.

https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/where-did-japanese-come-from-the-roots-of-the-japanese.890420/page-14 https://www.iz2.or.jp/english/@#$%usyoku/@#$%usei/4.htm

Two other Chinese dynastic histories mentioned Himiko. While both clearly incorporated the Wei Zhi reports, they made some changes, such as specifying the "some seventy or eighty years" of Wa wars occurred between 146 and 189, during the reigns of Han Emperors Huan and Ling. The c. 432 Book of Later Han (Hou Han Shu 後漢書) says "the King of Great Wa resides in the country of Yamadai", rather than the Queen: In terms of Japanese phonology (which historically did not have the consonant /h/ and whose modern /h/ evolves from historical /p/),[34] the accepted modern reading of 'Himiko' would regularly correspond to Old Japanese *Pimeko. However, Roy Andrew Miller says *Pimeko is a lexicographic error deriving from the Wei Zhi transcriptions

Done. I contact Stan on Telegram.

you better be careful because I can talk to an admin.