Leaderboard

The general plan needs to be saved (as it's following a schema: enlarging economy, building defense and then attack - or something similar). If it forgets where it was in the schema, and it starts all over. But anyway, wraitii, it should go through those first phases quite fast right. So maybe it's good to let the AI start over as it were a new game, for the time being.

It's actually not that easy to just save the AI state. If you restart from scratch, it's going to make terrible decisions... You need to save what it wanted to do with its villagers, things like that. Sure you could try to guess it backwards on loading, but some stuffs won't work (defense, attack…), and the way the AI is coded currently makes this extremely unpractical too (sadly). Fixing the Ai for saving games is actually not extremely hard, but doing it right is hard. And tied with how javascript fundamentally works, which might change as we are considering upgrading.

Realize that wraiti only works on Aegis in his spare time, and since schedules can really fluctuate, it is difficult to say that even he can know. With that fact in mind, it is better to patiently wait for it to be fixed while more pressing in-game problems are dealt with.

personally, i think Stonehenge is still the best choice. if not it, then we can say that it's another set of standing stones which were erected by the Brythonic Celts from 500-1bc. besides, there'd be no realistic justification for why you wouldn't be able to walk on top of an Uffington White Horse because, for all intents and purposes, it would be flat

feneur: I'm thinking that's wrong. If we implement a coherent system to have options (not the mess we have right now in the c++ code. Seriously adding a new setting is horrible), we will need to have settings for each feature anyway, so it's actually easier to have them all layed out in an "advanced" tab. The actual work is getting the right settings for low/medium/high (and having a coherent "preferred settings" function).