That means more legal work, data processing and stuff;

Because those are completely different softwares and use cases.

Over at Gitea, some minutes ago @fabio argued against the removal of the version and build information, too. I support fabio and @Stan`s take, that it would be a regression. Indeed it doesn't add value to gameplay but to game development.

I think i have notes some where... but again keep in mind its mostly me working on the tempaltes/files and sometimes i get sidetracked and then start working on something else and forgot.   If there is something you were really passionate about fixing, Id rather you pestor me about it than assume Im gonna remember and go back and do it   Ill take a look over notes in a little.  Ill also say this, there are some things that I change that for some reason don't work/arent seen by other people.  Not 100% sure whats going on with that sometimes.  Its more technical unit stuff, like I can train ephors and diplomats, but most other people when they play can't for some reason.... even though we have same version of game.  I dont think these are the types of things your talking about, but its pausble that I might see a description that someone else sees the old version.  Im still relatively new.   Yes I know!  ANd when i asked if I should restrict them for now it said not yet.  Again part of it is a balance thing.  But they seem to be quite ineffective at moment anyway   so ill need to fix that first.

Ok, but I see you said "I know longer have any conversations between us before may 15th.  If it was in a previous CWA post, remember all my posts got wiped accidentally cause they thought i was a spam bot", meaning, that from before May 15 your inbox didn't get wiped out, right? You deleted the multiple pages of messages on purpose because you took the necessary notes, right? Then, you should have the corrections you haven't implemented yet still written around, right?   What I tell you is always pretty clear, extensive, and sourced, you just choose to not pay attention, dismiss it, forget it, ask again, write unintelligibly, and repeat from the start, for then use ChatGPT for it to tell you whatever you want to hear. But even ChatGPT will tell you things like (just testing it): Sparta: Limited/occasional use of stakes; not a defining tactic. Macedon: More reliance on sarissa pikes than ground spikes; obstacles used defensively when useful. Rome: Most systematic use of stakes and other field obstacles, thanks to strong military-engineering traditions. So, as I've told you before with many things: you are wasting your energy and not being more accurate than vanilla if you indiscriminately add at the same level stuff that is irrelevant for some and characteristic for others.