Forums
.thumb.jpg.b21ca1d0c15fb56b42c39b25a0a40815.jpg)
-
Who's Online 3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 61 Guests (See full list)
-
Latest updates
-
-
Newest Posts
-
By Jameessmith · Posted
The XIII century AD, also known as the 13th century, marked a pivotal period in history characterized by significant events such as the rise of Gothic architecture, the Mongol Empire's expansion, and the beginning of the Renaissance. For a deeper understanding of this era, consider seeking resources or even online assignment help to navigate through its complexities effectively. -
By real_tabasco_sauce · Posted
This is a good watch for those familiar with the automation debate. Ok so maybe its a different game from 0ad, but many points on automation are valid across RTS games. Maybe the most important is the division of attention between fighting and economy. The controversy of this farm auto-placement puts into start contrast the motion to automize unit and technology production like in proGUI. In 0ad, we already have some things heavily automated like autoqueue. Admittedly, autoqueue is more justified in 0ad given the citizen soldier mechanics, but I heavily advocate against further automation. Some say 0ad is too hard, but I say let it be hard. Learning how to do hard things and winning for your efforts is rewarding and exciting. To improve the experience of new players, focus should instead be placed on improving the ui, ranked games, and matchmaking/finding. Obviously, we don't have any kind of matchmaking, but it is important that new players get a few games with players of roughly equal skill so they can experience more than just village phase. Excessive automation makes RTS games easier sure, but also shallow, and shallow games are not fun for long. One of the main issues with aoe4 is that where aoe2 is deep, aoe4 is shallow (homing bullets, 1-click strategies). We can make 0ad more deep by increasing the amount of player-controlled features, adding more technologies (unique and/or unit-specific), and diversifying unit stats. -
By real_tabasco_sauce · Posted
not even any links XD. I guess this just an advertisement? It seems like for this game no audience should be left unturned. Its a public nuisance. -
By Gurken Khan · Posted
What is supposed to block a conquest victory? Is it only builder units/buildings that could spawn those? Because I just spent some time hunting down an elusive minister. He can build and train nothing, so I don't know why a civ isn't defeated if he's the only thing left. On a related note: I don't think I ever saw a Han AI player build a ministry. They probably don't know how to use them. The only benefit they gain would be a small eco boost around where the starting minister stands. -
The screenshot of the tutorial , was shown only for general understanding, where the information was taken from while adding the resource to the game. gui/summary is the folders in the mod the full path may look like this: summary.js file /home/.local/share/0ad/mods/Name of your mod/gui/summary/summary.js var g_MaxHeadingTitle = 9; replace the value with 10 (if 1 new resource is added) summary.xml file /home/.local/share/0ad/mods/Name of your mod/gui/summary/summary.xml <repeat var=“x” count=“9”> replace value by 10(if 1 new resource is added) there are 5 such lines in the file -
.thumb.png.0d87fc71cb8a644c5d862ceabac1e0d5.png)
By Lion.Kanzen · Posted
I was seeing coins on Facebook that represent clothing and armor quite well. -
Diving deep into Sassanian military stuffs is no easy task, i need some time to explore when a lot of information is contradicting against each other. Sassanians seems to prefer mining and siege towers when they conduct siege warfare, therefore i suggest Delenda Est team to consider sword auxiliary unit. The appearance of this particular troop should have: 1. A helmet (ridge helmet) or mail coif 2. A mail hauberk 3. A wicker shield/buckler.
-
