Mythos_Ruler Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 There really arent any "Ages" in the game. The epochs are called "phases" as in the "Phase" of your city - the size of your city or civilisation. Village -> Town -> City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belisarivs Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Ah, I misunderstood it.There could be better ways how to solve it.Will it be possible to have something like timed periods? It would fit to For Honour and Glory mod. Each period would last for certain time equally for all civs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos_Ruler Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I don't see why not. That's one of those ideas I am sure was tossed around during design phase for 0 A.D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 So like R:TW where if you have 10000 pop you are in major city and can get good soldiers and bigger buildings.and if you have 10 pop you are a village and can only get weak units and small buildings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tycan Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 I like the idea of the more land you have, the more resources you get per second or something of the sort. that way people will always be at the edge fighting each other. But I guess it's kind of a flawed plan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos_Ruler Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 Scipii - Actually you still "research" the higher city phase, but they aren't "Ages." Sorry to disappoint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 DDDAAAAAMMMMMMMMMIIIIIITTTT!!!!! Bayern Munich lost and NOW I FIND OUT THAT I HAVE RESEARCH AGES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 Maybe (so you don't have to say 0AD and 0AD2) you should call pt.1 BC0 and pt.2 0AD. Just a nitpicky persons thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteTreePaladin Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 I though the # came before the "BC" and after the "AD" So, why is it "0 AD" and not "AD 0" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeros Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Our internal names for 0 A.D. indeed are part 1 and part 2, the game was envisioned as a whole but for practicality purposes we split the other 6 civs into part 2. This will also leave us plenty of room to add more features in the future as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 ok then pt.1 0BC and AD0. To be extra correct how about 0BCE and CE0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos_Ruler Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Since 0 A.D. does not exist as a true date, we took artistic liberty with the format of the name itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 While i had a headache, i came up up with the idea of Rebellions, where a city is taken over by rebels, the rebels would be the same race as you but you have only limited diplomatic options (war and peace). this wouldn't work unless you had miscellaneous civs. like the tribes in AOE3 except they actually did something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteTreePaladin Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Since 0 A.D. does not exist as a true date, we took artistic liberty with the format of the name itself. I agree. 0 A.D. is much better than "A.D. 0" or "0 B.C." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tycan Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I have a suggestion, more forum participation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos_Ruler Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 From whom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tycan Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 anyone and everyone who can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 He has a point. there is close to noone on the forums, it's sorta weird, when i signed up like a year ago, you'd get a reply in seconds, but at least to replies of mine haven't been responded back to yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirePowa8 Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 I don't think there's ever been a point where you'd get a 'reply in seconds', few forums are that large. Actually, I've found this forum to be a little more active than usual as of late.Of course, getting new active members wouldn't hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian Posted April 26, 2007 Share Posted April 26, 2007 "I don't think there's ever been a point where you'd get a 'reply in seconds', few forums are that large. Actually, I've found this forum to be a little more active than usual as of late."Maybe not seconds but still overnight replies, stipulate Replies rather than the singular reply, is a mile and a half away from what you get on the forums now: COME ON PEOPLE TALK OR something. I'll be good now. besides i'll be gone for a while: School goes back next week and i go with it. (BLOODY AUSTRALIA) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tycan Posted April 26, 2007 Share Posted April 26, 2007 yeah, this board could really use some more replies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenpachi Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Hello I'm new here. I have an suggestion, units moving animation should be changed. In the preview video, marching units were happy marching , but not marching for a war. Well thats all for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paal_101 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Thanks Kenpachi! At present our animations and artwork are still in the preliminary stages and may very well change Stay tuned for such, as the game progresses! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gylippus Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 Here some more board activity for you guys. I recently stumbled upon your site and I'm excited about what all of you are doing with 0 AD. I've got a quick question for you. Are you planning on having a unit based upon the Theban Sacred Band? I've got more questions and ideas I'd like to voice, but they're escaping my thought at the moment, but I will post when they come to me. The game looks awesome! Keep up the great work guys. I'm anxiously awaiting the release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paal_101 Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 Thanks Gylippus! In fact the Sacred Band is going to be present in the game as a campaign unit Additionally, in possible expansions we will attempt to bring the Thebans in as a civilization branch, which of course means the Sacred Band. Feel free to ask more questions and suggest anything that comes to mind! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now