Jump to content

Market Bug: back or resurfaced?


Acanthis
 Share

Recommended Posts

Whichever the case may be, the fact that people are abusing it recently is a shame.

Sell metal for wood until the price of metal is quite low, buy the metal back with many times over return on investment. Players amassing 5000, 10 000 metal in a matter of seconds. Then just so happening to be a mercenary heavy civ while claiming not to know English or that exploiting bugs is cheating.

Hopefully there is a fix, otherwise hard to want to spend any free time playing when it can ruin a game.

The only silver lining is that it reveals which players are most willing to use exploits in order to win and try avoid playing with them in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least ppl can see it occur in tgs(trading history), if it is public knowledge and just ban those who cheat, seems easy enough. Im assuming this works with any res right? not just metal im guessing. Im gessing something to do with price changes being imbalanced? Or I remember something about ppl saying shift buying giving the initial price for whole batch, altho from my understanding thats not the case. 
Does this profit only occur with extreme conditions (selling thousands then rebuy), or can it occur in a less extreme manner even in general market use? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PLEASE delete this topic and send in private to staff :angel1:

35 minutes ago, vinme said:

At least ppl can see it occur in tgs(trading history), if it is public knowledge and just ban those who cheat, seems easy enough. Im assuming this works with any res right? not just metal im guessing. Im gessing something to do with price changes being imbalanced? Or I remember something about ppl saying shift buying giving the initial price for whole batch, altho from my understanding thats not the case. 
Does this profit only occur with extreme conditions (selling thousands then rebuy), or can it occur in a less extreme manner even in general market use? 

not in ffa without spec , noboby know, but in market we see something wrong. NOW how abuse market, without cheat purpose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/06/2025 at 11:14 PM, Dakara said:

PLEASE delete this topic and send in private to staff :angel1:

not in ffa without spec , noboby know, but in market we see something wrong. NOW how abuse market, without cheat purpose?

Yes. market would signal suspicion. Still very niche scenario, FFA with 0 spec. Rare. Not a giant problem. If suspicious, watch replay after and expose cheater to rest of players(ik ofc huge hassle and no1 will care anyway prob). 
Obv a fix would be nice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, vinme said:

If suspicious, watch replay after

If you don't want to install the oddity detector (which warns in-game) you could check quickly the barter efficiency. If that is suspiciously high watch the complete replay.

Note: Just a high efficiency alone is not sufficient to claim a market exploit. It is normal game play to use good prices once one takes note of it in the market. But a market exploit causes a high barter efficiency.

market.png

Edited by ffm2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/06/2025 at 9:39 PM, vinme said:

At least ppl can see it occur in tgs(trading history), if it is public knowledge and just ban those who cheat, seems easy enough. Im assuming this works with any res right? not just metal im guessing. Im gessing something to do with price changes being imbalanced? Or I remember something about ppl saying shift buying giving the initial price for whole batch, altho from my understanding thats not the case. 
Does this profit only occur with extreme conditions (selling thousands then rebuy), or can it occur in a less extreme manner even in general market use? 

Yes, this is another silver lining with having specs in the game who are nice enough to warn. Hopefully those who are hosting will have the courage to at least temporarily suspend some of these players who are using the exploit. I'm not a huge fan of just outright banning people, but more consequences would be good. Let's see how it develops.

Regarding deleting this topic, not sure it needs to be. I think people need to be made aware that this is a (renewed?) issue and to be on the lookout for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...