Arup Posted Sunday at 14:36 Report Share Posted Sunday at 14:36 Why do we not have a Han Infantry Swordsman ? In most, if not all depictions of the era, sword and helbs alongside crossbows is by and large the highlight of their weapons. "The jian was mentioned as one of the "Five Weapons" during the Han dynasty, the other four being dao, spear, halberd, and staff. Another version of the Five Weapons lists the bow and crossbow as one weapon, the jian and dao as one weapon, in addition to halberd, shield, and armour." - Wikipedia article on Han Military Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
real_tabasco_sauce Posted Sunday at 14:40 Report Share Posted Sunday at 14:40 Since the dao is really big i think they could get the longsword mixin that the mace sword champs get. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arup Posted Sunday at 14:46 Author Report Share Posted Sunday at 14:46 6 minutes ago, real_tabasco_sauce said: Since the dao is really big i think they could get the longsword mixin that the mace sword champs get. exactly what my suggestion is as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emacz Posted Sunday at 17:31 Report Share Posted Sunday at 17:31 (edited) 2 hours ago, Arup said: Why do we not have a Han Infantry Swordsman ? In most, if not all depictions of the era, sword and helbs alongside crossbows is by and large the highlight of their weapons. "The jian was mentioned as one of the "Five Weapons" during the Han dynasty, the other four being dao, spear, halberd, and staff. Another version of the Five Weapons lists the bow and crossbow as one weapon, the jian and dao as one weapon, in addition to halberd, shield, and armour." - Wikipedia article on Han Military prettty ez to add, they already have a template for "infantry_swordsman_special" adding to historical now. The current version of game doesnt exactly stick to accurately depicting the time period. A lot more civs would have a variety of units. Edited Sunday at 17:32 by Emacz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deicide4u Posted Sunday at 18:04 Report Share Posted Sunday at 18:04 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Emacz said: A lot more civs would have a variety of units. Of course they would, every army in the ancient world had diverse military units. The challenge is to stick to what differentiated them one from another for gameplay balance and sheer fun factor. To give examples from the game: 1) Giving Persians more cavalry choice because they were renowned for it, 2) Giving Romans great sword infantry because they were feared for it, 3) Giving Spartans one-man armies early, and Leonidas, 4) Giving Gauls crazy units because the French always were a bit on the goofy side Edited Sunday at 18:05 by Deicide4u 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emacz Posted Sunday at 18:10 Report Share Posted Sunday at 18:10 Thats what historical is all about Persian we didnt add any more horses, they already have a lot, but we did add a camel they used camel cavalry and supposedly they scared enemy horses. Romans get a small sword bonus (but so do iber, spanish steal was quite sought after) Sparta's shamps are stronger... i was thinking of adding their heroes p2, but at reduced health and dmg, but same bonus. Maybe Ill work on that today. Gauls themselves didnt exactly have a lot of other units per say, but other celtic tribes did. We have the Rutheni archer, Rhaetian Axeman and Treveri Spear/Jav cav that you can get through the Celtic Coalition. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arup Posted Thursday at 07:13 Author Report Share Posted Thursday at 07:13 I love historical patch 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emacz Posted 22 hours ago Report Share Posted 22 hours ago Thanks for the love @Arup Just need more people to play so we can find all the errors i made and fix em Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted 19 hours ago Report Share Posted 19 hours ago On 04/05/2025 at 4:36 PM, Arup said: Why do we not have a Han Infantry Swordsman ? In most, if not all depictions of the era, sword and helbs alongside crossbows is by and large the highlight of their weapons. "The jian was mentioned as one of the "Five Weapons" during the Han dynasty, the other four being dao, spear, halberd, and staff. Another version of the Five Weapons lists the bow and crossbow as one weapon, the jian and dao as one weapon, in addition to halberd, shield, and armour." - Wikipedia article on Han Military Technically, every civs should have swordsmen from the start. Even the Hellenistic civs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emacz Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago 7 hours ago, Genava55 said: Technically, every civs should have swordsmen from the start. Even the Hellenistic civs. What would their swordsmen be called/used for? For example from what I have read so far on sparta, doesnt really sound like Helots, Periokoi ever had swords. Would just be spartiates as a secondary weapon. Which could be done... but since their spear attack is so strong, doesnt really seem needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 58 minutes ago, Emacz said: What would their swordsmen be called/used for? Hoplites means 'men-at-arms', this is a generic word. Swordsmen could be named something like Makhairaphoroi, aka 'makhaira-bearers', makhaira being a popular one-edged sword. 1 hour ago, Emacz said: Would just be spartiates as a secondary weapon. It is generally a secondary weapon yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.