Jump to content

The myth of the "hoplon."


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Genava55 said:

Yeah it is sadly something repeated over and over by modern pseudo-historians.

I haven't watched the whole video, but I've known for several years, possibly as long as I've been working on 0 A.D., that the "hoplite comes from their hoplon shield" trope was just incorrect received knowledge passed down for 150 years. 

Hoplon means gear or kit or equipment, so sure, a shield is a hoplon, but hoplon is not shield. Aspis is shield, always has been (lol). So, hoplite always meant "one who is equipped" (for battle). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said:

I haven't watched the whole video, but I've known for several years, possibly as long as I've been working on 0 A.D., that the "hoplite comes from their hoplon shield" trope was just incorrect received knowledge passed down for 150 years. 

Hoplon means gear or kit or equipment, so sure, a shield is a hoplon, but hoplon is not shield. Aspis is shield, always has been (lol). So, hoplite always meant "one who is equipped" (for battle). 

Could you say that it means "armed"?

Are all soldiers; hoplites?

Edit: "man-at-arms"

"Hombre de armas" in Spanish.

Edit2: Later he quotes Homer speaking about Achilles.

Screenshot_20241226-124805.thumb.jpg.ea1f413d9faed3760235af23a54e2068.jpg

I like these references.

Screenshot_20241226-125141.thumb.jpg.fcc0053cc79b1b238bdcfec894c7be56.jpg

The first time the term "hoplite" is used, according to him, is a reference to a writing by Pindar.

Edited by Lion.Kanzen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...