Search the Community

Hi :), I've got a troubles with building game from source. After "git clone" ... "./update-workspaces.sh -j3" has finished with error message " the file fmt/printf.h included in ~/source/ps/CLogger.h not exist". I have added the full file path and "./update-workspaces.sh -j3" has finished successefully: Updating bundled third-party dependencies... FCollada is already up to date. SpiderMonkey is already up to date. NVTT is already up to date. make: Entering directory '/home/ssdhp/0adnew/0ad/build/premake/premake5/build/gmake2.unix' ==== Building lua-lib (release) ==== ==== Building zip-lib (release) ==== ==== Building zlib-lib (release) ==== ==== Building curl-lib (release) ==== ==== Building mbedtls-lib (release) ==== ==== Building luashim-lib (release) ==== ==== Building example (release) ==== ==== Building luasocket (release) ==== ==== Building Premake5 (release) ==== make: Leaving directory '/home/ssdhp/0adnew/0ad/build/premake/premake5/build/gmake2.unix' Premake args: --atlas Building configurations... Running action 'gmake'... Done (2327ms). !!!...but "make -j3" has finished with : "==== Building mocks_real (release) ==== ==== Building network (release) ==== ==== Building rlinterface (release) ==== ==== Building tinygettext (release) ==== ==== Building lobby (release) ==== ==== Building glooxwrapper (release) ==== ==== Building simulation2 (release) ==== ==== Building scriptinterface (release) ==== ==== Building engine (release) ==== ==== Building graphics (release) ==== ==== Building atlas (release) ==== ==== Building gui (release) ==== ==== Building lowlevel (release) ==== ==== Building mongoose (release) ==== ==== Building Collada (release) ==== ==== Building pyrogenesis (release) ==== Linking pyrogenesis /usr/bin/ld: not exist -lfmt collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status pyrogenesis.make:80: recipe for target '../../../binaries/system/pyrogenesis' failed make[1]: *** [../../../binaries/system/pyrogenesis] Error 1 Makefile:70: recipe for target 'pyrogenesis' failed make: *** [pyrogenesis] Error 2" A little help :), please p.s. Linux 4.15.0-99-generic #100-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 22 20:32:56 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

It was a well discussed topic. But, I want to remind some of the inequality amongst civilizations... 1. Building Time:- As we know, Gauls and Britons have a lowered building time for their weak structures. But conversely this gave them advantage in games. As per history, their knowledge of architecture wasn't well and scientific as like that of others(Romans, Carthaginians, Persians or Greeks). So, it's obvious that their building would be rubble. But, this deduction in 20% building time make them more efficient. Again, most of their structures has a population bonus. But think carefully, did a hut like structure has any access to extension option? I think no, so it'll be better and more balanced if Britons & Gauls have a slightly slower building rate and No population extension option by houses unlike others and also weaker Armour for buildings(20% less). 2. Superiority of Slingers over Archers(Especially) and Skirmishers:- Apparently most of the player would definitely admit that Slingers are the strongest unit in the game. But, is it feasible for Slingers to have more than 1.5 times pierce damage than Archers. A piece of stone cause more crush damage than pierce. So, I think there should a balance between Slingers and Archers. Maybe 7.5 pierce damage for Archers and 8.5 pierce damage along with 1.5 crush damage for Slingers. 3. Superiority of Roman Siege and Persian Rams:- There is no doubt that Romans and Persians had a superior Siege units with better atrack. But, this wasn't spontaneous. This was achieved by a long period of experiment. So, It'll be best to give them a technology(with practical costs) instead of just giving them directly. Along with that I would also suggest to give Carthaginian and Ptolemaic Juggernauts and Heavy Warships an equal Bonus by a similar technology. 4. Unlimited Access for certain Buildings I'm listing some buildings that can be built during game... Persians--- Apandana- 1, Hall- 2, Ishtar Gate- 1 Carthaginians--- Embassy- 2, Tophet- None. Sparatans--- Royal Stoa- Unlimited Athenians--- Royal Stoa- Unlimited, Gymnasium- Unlimited Gauls--- Tavern- Unlimited Britons--- Kennel- Unlimited Mauryans--- Palace- None Kushites--- Nuba Village/Camp- 2 Diadochii--- Military Colony- Unlimited Romans--- Army Camp- Unlimited These all disparity makes some civilization really underdog and some of them really strong. Please fix it. Maybe by giving an option for increasing the number of town phase buildings by 1 for each Civic Center was made and by limiting the number of City phase structures. 4. No Trample Damage for Elephants and Ability of Rams to Attack Organic Units:- This is one of the worst and impractical thing that makes Rams more stronger and efficient than Elephants. As Rams could only be destroyed by hack damage(most efficient and fast). On the other hand, not only Elephants can be killed by Ranged units easily but also they can be easily blocked by any units or women. And so this makes them useless. Again, more or less equal speed of an Elephants as compared to Rams make them more impractical. But, ideally an elephant has a great momentum along with a speed of nearly 40 km/h. So, I think they should have more speed with a continuous movement not obstructed by Organic Units. It'll be also better if we add trample damage for cavalry. 5. Costs for making a Catapult and Elephant:- An elephant costs 250 food and 250 metal and 3 population which is really impractical. Raising an elephant is more costlier than making a Ram. Again, making a Catapult cause not that much wood (400). So, there should be a balance. Again, most of the units first try to capture Bolt Shooters and Catapults instead of just destroying it! So, there should be a mode which can determine whether units will attack it or try to capture it. 6. Units and Faction Requests:- And lastly, I've some personal thoughts that I would like to share. In short--- I) Maiden Guards should not be trained from Barracks. They are elite and special units which only protect Royal persons and so they should be trained from Palace. And please give Mauryans access to Rams. II) Kindly give Chandragupta Maurya and Chanakya a decent hero bonus. And please reconsider the bonuses given to some heroes like Hannibal(a bonus of 20% faster batch time for mercenaries instead of 20% less damage for enemy mercenaries) III) Instead of giving a 20% health Reduction for Archery Tradition, it'll be better if we apply a 5% or maybe 10% health Reduction just like Persian Infantry. IV) Civ Bonuses--- Some Civs have very much helpful Civ Bonus(Iberians, Seleucids, Ptolemies, Sparatans, Athenians, Macedonians, Romans, Gauls, Persians, Kushites) and some have impractical Civ Bonus(Carthaginians, Mauryans, Britons). Please reconsider them. Hope, the authority will consider my urges...

I am having trouble with my villagers getting stuck after they build the palisade walls, they can't get out. Is there a gate I have to build them or something? Thanks!

The concept was mentioned before. A Neutral building is non-buildable structure and don't the architecture influence by any faction, isn't relative to any, is only a usable building if is captured by a player. in this new building you can train eyecandy units. slaves from all cultures. Men and women. This will be cheap than current villager. wild animal (tamed) to use as pet or to fight, like tigers, lions, elephant workers, war dogs. Examples