Perzival12
Community Members-
Posts
373 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Everything posted by Perzival12
-
That sounds really interesting, though I am not sure how that would play like. The idea of being forced to build railroads to transport troops kinda sucks, but using railroads as supply lines that go to different resources might be cool. Then, you can build some sort of harvesting building at a resource (a mine at a quarry, a lumberyard at a forest, etc.), have a railroad coming from it to the main civic center, and get resources much faster and simpler.
-
Game Balance: Battering Rams, the 0 A.D. tanks?...
Perzival12 replied to krt0143's topic in Gameplay Discussion
Then there should be unit actors pushing the ram, just like how the siege catapults and ballista have people manning them. At the moment rams look like their moving of their own accord, they could at east have two people in them to make them look better. Maybe I should talk to @wowgetoffyourcellphone about this. -
Game Balance: Battering Rams, the 0 A.D. tanks?...
Perzival12 replied to krt0143's topic in Gameplay Discussion
They should cost 0 pop, only wood and maybe metal. Any population cost would come from soldiers garrisoned inside. (This would probably make rams garrisonable on ships without taking up space though). -
Yeah, Decide4U a few weeks ago. I'm relatively new to the forum as well, so I don't know of any others.
-
There are several Discords already open that we could migrate to, but it would probably be best to start our own. Sad really, since using Discord seems to encourage the posting of random crap over actual discussion of useful topics. But maybe it will be for the best.
-
Game Balance: Battering Rams, the 0 A.D. tanks?...
Perzival12 replied to krt0143's topic in Gameplay Discussion
Rams should move only slightly slower than infantry, after all, they are presumably being pushed by infantry (otherwise, their just rolling of their own accord). Even if the ram weighs a lot, ten infantry should be able to make it go at least as fast as a single infantryman. An idea for balancing (and realism) is that rams and other siege machines should be stationary until their are people garrisoned in them. Siege towers and seige machines with people as part of the actor would be the only exceptions (and ships, which presumably have a rowing crew onboard). -
I’d start your own thread, where you post releases and news about your mod. Don’t make a thread for each civ or anything, because that will just overtake the entire forum. To your second question if your making your own mod, it doesn’t matter if your mod is ambitious or large, your the one making it. Thirdly, sense you mentioned that you are not an artist, you would probably be best off making your multiple starts idea, where you customize a start for each civ (this would be a pretty small undertaking, just edit the relevant section in each races civ file). The Iberians already have something like this, just do it to the rest.
-
The game has a pretty large user base, though this forum has gotten more or less abandoned over the years, to the point of which there are about 20 regular users and a few people who come and go a lot. It’s great to see more people coming to this forum lately, I wonder if we could increase the number by making the Forums button bigger on the 0ad website (as it is, it’s a little small and hard to see, especially on a phone).
-
If you wan’t to get started, you could make a mod. It’s pretty easy to do, and is a good way of learning how the coding and design is for 0ad, without slowing down game development with any errors or flaws that you accidentally have (and there will be many, believe me). In fact, several mods have actually been made a part of the game over the years, so if your mod is high-enough quality (or you make a pull request), your mod could be added as well. There is not much work for a beginner at coding, but more art and civs is always welcome. I recommend, if you want to join in the actual development, check for work here: https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/wiki/GettingStarted
-
The problem used to be I would get the llvmpipe error I talked about a few weeks ago. However, at some point the Scenario Editor simply broke, so that it no longer even displays an editable map. I probably should reinstall it, but it will still be broken with the llvmpipe error. Unless there is a way to change the Scenario Esitor’s rendering to Vulcan rendering, I can’t make Scenarios.
-
When I tried to do so, it gave me errors, telling me rustc is too old. I read later in that thread that I need to install rustup, but there was no instructions for it. Ideas?
-
The problem I am having is that my copy of 0ad is a FlatPak, and because of this the Scenario Editor doesn’t work, so I can’t make my own scenario maps, only hand-edit existing ones, which is a pain in the @$$.
-
Sorry about that. The campaign isn’t finished, still a long way to go. I actually have given up on it for the time being, but if you think it is worth pursuing, I’ll try to get it done for the next release.
-
The newest release is out! You can get it on Github: https://github.com/Perzival123/Hyrule-Conquest-Revival, and on ModDB: https://www.moddb.com/mods/hyrule-conquest-revival/downloads/hyrule-conquest-revival-0-3-0. I'll post it here later.
-
It seems to have been fixed, the newest upload says 5 downloads. Wonder what the bug was.
-
Thanks.
- 2 replies
-
- multiplayer
- multiplayer lobby
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hey, so lately I've been trying to join some online games, but everytime I try, I get this error: Failed to connect to server This is often caused by UDP port 20595 not being forwarded on the host side, by a firewall, or anti-virus software. I made sure I only have the compatible mods on, and I tried joining a bunch of different games, but I always get the same error. Is it because I am using a FlatPak? Or is it some setting on my computer? I am using a Librem 14 with PureOS installed, if that is important.
- 2 replies
-
- multiplayer
- multiplayer lobby
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
No, not the person who did the patch. I'm talking about the programmer who did most of the .js code for the original Hyrule Conquest mod.
-
By the way, your download isn't recording how many people have downloaded it.
-
Kay, just a thought.
-
What if you add the ability to snap walls to a fortress' towers? Then fortresses would be more realistic, more useful to build, and take up less space.
-
That patch is really old, and has been abandoned for a while now. I'll probably talk to the programmer who added it into A26 for TUN. Unless he (or somebody here) want's to update the A26 code, then I'll probably have him recode it, since it relies on a lot of other features I don't want (yet).
