Jump to content

real_tabasco_sauce

0 A.D. Gameplay Team
  • Posts

    2.878
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    71

Posts posted by real_tabasco_sauce

  1. A GUI mod should not change the way the game works underneath, only the way you graphically interface with it.

    14 hours ago, WiseKind said:

    You are making the point that this "real-time" aspect necessarily means that there must be some mechanical challenge. You believe that this is what "real-time" always meant. I disagree with this.

    Yes, but you are forgetting that the spirit of competition drives one player to be better than another and that as a direct result, players with high APM do better than players that cannot keep up. This is inescapable. Automation generally is not the solution because it just decreases the number of actions a player can do, which flattens the learning curve. Instead, the ways in which an action can be better than another action, strategic options, should be increased. This allows one players fewer, smarter actions to have more of an impact.

    I'm trying to help with this last part :)

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  2. On 12/03/2025 at 5:12 AM, Genava55 said:

    @wowgetoffyourcellphone maybe the Eagle standard can be made available when the Marian reforms tech is researched?

    I'm not sure if a technology can change something like the standard, but I think that would be a really nice touch.

    On 13/03/2025 at 4:17 PM, nifa said:

    If there's a wish to implement roman standard bearers (Signifer, Aquilifer or vexillarius) I would be happy to make meshes with less tris

    I feel like a standard bearer unit would be a bit redundant with the animated standard when using formations no? Plus, we already have the centurion for the romans, so its hard to imagine a gameplay role for them too.

    That being said, it might be useful for campaign development/cinematics.

    • Like 2
  3. On 12/03/2025 at 11:17 PM, Carltonus said:

    For the faction to be in a future Release, match the art-style of official factions? brush-work, that is. They do appear similar to certain Rise of the East factions...

    I used the style of @Sundiata. The drawings are quite similar to the heroes from existing factions. (except for some props like the shield, sword, and hood.

  4. @Obskiuras do you need one? I thought I had set that repository to 'public' so anyone can clone. That repository is a bit behind since i've been working on the gitea pull request. (I would link it, but gitea seems to be down atm).

    Is there a "contributor" role? I'm not sure which is best, but I don't think it will make much of a difference if you want to contribute to the mod.

    If you have some art to contribute, you could also send it to me and I can add it directly to the pull request.

  5. 31 minutes ago, Obskiuras said:

    @wowgetoffyourcellphone I want to try the Suebi faction, but only that faction, not the entire mod. How i do that?

    do you want to try DE suebians, or what is being prepared on gitea?

    If you want to do the latter, it might be easier to just clone this mod: https://gitlab.com/real_tabasco_sauce/cimbri-refinement

    move to your mods folder then do:

    git clone https://gitlab.com/real_tabasco_sauce/cimbri-refinement.git

    not sure how you could get just the suebians out of DE.

    • Thanks 1
  6. 7 hours ago, Gurken Khan said:

    Yesterday the game froze on foothills; it wasn't completely dead as the birds kept on chirping. After ~20 minutes of not responding I gave up and killed it. No error logs, last thing noted was something loading successfully. If I catch anything I will post it.

    Something more concrete: fish in land on Scythian Rivulet

    0ad-landfish.jpg.cbef197d4f0cae8f2357c7561385fb3b.jpg

    lungfish

    No, actually this is a mistake from trying to add fish to this map XD.

  7. 7 minutes ago, TheCJ said:

    If one wants to play a game without any mechanical challenge, one should maybe rather look at turn-based games.

    100%

    The division of attention and division of labor are key to RTS games. The player only has so many things that can be done at one time. This makes up a substantial portion of the skill curve, and it is very important that games have a skill curve to learn.

    I think we just need to develop the strategic options available to players and high APM will become less strong relative to strategy.

    • Thanks 1
  8. 47 minutes ago, alre said:

    just change captured buildings behavior. I swear, the biggest obstacle I can see to 0ad progression is bogus features that won't ever get corrected because some random dev likes them in spite of all reason.

    Is that the biggest obstacle?

    Honestly, I think all that needs to happen is to come up with a consistent scheme to determine what units are available from captured buildings.

  9. At one time, a mod allowed automating unit teleportation. This meant buildings could be set up like roads across which women could travel extremely quickly. Likewise, barracks could quickly transport soldiers across long distances.

    This isn't against the "Rules" as you describe, because you could technically do this, maybe if each turn was 10 seconds. Should this be considered cheating?

    • Thanks 1
  10. 4 hours ago, WiseKind said:

    This game has so much potential, and I feel responsible for speaking out before the community takes this amazing project in the wrong direction in the name of fear and protecting the community against a frankly vacuous threat.

    Its a tad strange that you call this threat "vacuous" and describe your concern for multiplayer when you haven't yet played it, but regardless, but I understand you come from open-source absolutist standpoint, so maybe that's it.  I appreciate your interest in 0ad and I hope the multiplayer community is welcoming when you decide to check it out!

×
×
  • Create New...