-
Posts
406 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Posts posted by PyrrhicVictoryGuy
-
-
Trying to figure out what would Etruscan use, I mean they would probably have equipment similar to the Latins.
-
6 hours ago, Genava55 said:
The picture comes from Osprey, so you should simply check the description. Someone copied it there:
https://weaponsandwarfare.com/2020/02/16/etruscan-warriors/
8. ETRUSCANS IN THE ROMAN ARMY, 2nd–1st CENTURIES BC
1) Lictor
Painted urns from Volterra show cornicines and lictores attending victors or magistrates; this lictor is copied from the Tomba del Convegno (Monterozzi necropolis, Tarquinia). He is wearing the toga gabina and carries an iron double-axe (bipennis).
(2) Eques
An unusual urn from Volterra, representing the myth of Eteocles and Polynices, shows the brothers dressed like Roman cavalrymen of the period, with Boeotian helmets fitted with the geminae pinnae of Mars, shields of popanum typology, leather armour (spolas), greaves, and short swords.
(3) Centurio
This Roman centurion, copied from an urn in Florence Museum, wears a pseudo-Corinthian helmet fitted with a crista transversa. His composite armour is made of leather (shoulder-guards), padded material (main corselet), and on the chest bronze scales (squamae). Note his calcei boots, and the richly varied colours of his panoply.
(4) Guardsman
Reconstructed from the Sarteana urn, this Roman miles wears a late Montefortino helmet found in Forum Novum. His body armour combines a bronze kardiophylax breastplate and a linothorax corselet. We have added a single left greave and the curved oblong legionary scutum of his time; his weapons are the hasta and the deadly gladius hispaniensis.
(5) Magistrate
The absorption of Etruria into Rome saw leading Etruscan families climbing the government hierarchy. This official, copied from the famous statue of Aule Metele, wears the toga exigua over a tunica; the latter’s purple angusticlavi, and the gold ring on his left hand, identify him as a member of the equestrian order. Hidden here, he would also be wearing high calcei boots with lingula, and fastened by corrigiae.i saw that but i wanted a second opinion, I am no expert and the internet aint reliable
-
ok my bad the bonus applies but the two crossed swords icon does not show up
- 2
-
I just played a tg and although the archer cav was next to antiochus , the bonus icon didn't show on their heads. But the bonus works on melee cav.
-
Can someone confirm if antiochus iii's bonus applies to ranged cav (seleucids), because i don't think it does.
-
-
Making spear/lance cav even more micro intensive will be worse unless one makes infantry need more micro also.
- 1
-
13 hours ago, Lion.Kanzen said:
a short introduction to the encyclopedia Británica or Wiki even Total War forum have some good introductions.
Still don't know who should i start with, divided between the etruscans and the syracusans, cuz im also thinking of the any new assets that could be needed for the etruscans. Also syraracuse is easier and any concept for them won't include any new assets for the most part but i hesitate to create a concept of another mercenary civ since mercs are meh and we don't know if they will become good by A25.
-
2 hours ago, Yekaterina said:
Funny thing , only the middle is new to me.
- 1
-
Etruscans will be a big problem. Namely their language. They also need to be similar to both greeks and romans but distinct in their own way.
It is also hard to make syracuse different than just "athens with more mercenaries" Although heroes are slightly easier : Gelon , Agathocles(?) and Pyrrhus or Dionysus
-
34 minutes ago, Lion.Kanzen said:
They are many... I don't know if I have time to make an introduction.
@wowgetoffyourcellphone Or @PyrrhicVictoryGuy can handle that.
I could try my hand at one of those design docs.
- 1
-
Nah man, giving almost everyone skirms and spears is a bad move i think.
- 1
-
True but this is an idea i had for a while , i think civs have too many troop types available and this makes differentiation beyond cosmetics difficult .
54 minutes ago, Yekaterina said:Surely you have to judge a civ based on more factors than that. We can introduce some unique concepts for example swimming champions for Illyrians, reconnaissance eagles for Mongolians and war tigers.
-
I'd be down for etruria though i still think civs should be divided into spear civs and sword civs
-
Tbh i mentioned these as a joke really, there is no way to make them different enough from those already in game to justify them.
- 2
-
And pontus and the bosphorus kingdom
-
Well it is safe to say that some heroes got shafted pretty hard by the devs
-
Hey how about we add more greeks?
-
The key here is not to set your expectations too high.
-
Nah it will stay the same , the devs are few and have their own jobs so anything deviating fromthe scope of their original designs won't really be touched.
-
What gives you this idea?
-
on paper only , right now they are made of glass and aren't particulary squishy.
- 1
-
Phrygian vs attic, wich is better?
-
what do u call those late attic/ thracian helmets?
Historians assemble
in General Discussion
Posted
I also saw those fin like helmets but aren-t those villanova era thingies only?