AIEND

In reality, the crossbow cavalry is weaker than the archer cavalry, so there is no need to do it. I don't know why some people are obsessed with this unit. It is necessary to know that the Han Dynasty is played in the game, not the Qin Dynasty.

Chariots use bows and arrows. High-strength crossbows cannot be used on horses or chariots, so the Chinese feel they are inferior to bows and arrows.

You have to realize that the Chinese do not like to use crossbows on horses or chariots, because it is very inefficient. Although chariots and cavalry were equipped with crossbows in the Qin Dynasty, that was because the Qin army recruited many to expand the size of the army. Caused by people who are not good at riding and archery. The Han Dynasty controlled the army within a certain size and preferred to use a small number of elite soldiers.

Elite crossbowmen use high-strength crossbows, called "蹶张Juezhang" in ancient times, so champion crossbowmen should keep it. Xiongnu's advantage lies in their cavalry archers, their infantry archers are not as good as the Han Dynasty, and the Xiongnu soldiers who surrendered to the Han army in reality only have cavalry.

No, they converted to Buddhism, which is somewhat similar to Manichaeism, and were finally driven by the Mongolians who believed in Islam to Gansu, China, which is now the Yugur. The Uyghurs that China now defines are not really Uyghurs, but the settled indigenous people of the older oasis, who cannot leave their homeland like the nomadic Uyghurs, so they can only be conquered and believe in Islam.

I don't recommend deleting archers and spearmen, because JI is not equal to pike, and it is often not used with shields, but I am in favor of putting crossbowmen in P1, Han should have crossbowmen and spearmen to combine in P1, and archers should shoot Faster and placed in P2, JI should have stronger attack but weaker protection against projectile weapons. Abolish the crossbow cavalry, although there are such units in reality, it is rare, because the use of crossbows on horses is considered to be poor equestrian and not good at using bows and arrows. The cavalry should be sword cavalry for P1, spear cavalry and archer cavalry for P2. Champion I don't know why the chariot should be cancelled. It should be a spearman, a crossbowman, a spear cavalry, and a chariot.

The conversion of the Khazars to Judaism is similar to the conversion of the Uighurs to Manichaeism.

I think it's better to have a field with a barn that takes up a lot of land, and let 8-10 civilians work on it, which can be placed independently from the CC, just like Age of Empires 3.

I have to remind you that it is a stereotype to think that there are few fat women in Asia. And as mentioned earlier, because strong men and women often have thick waists, loose armor is suitable for both men and women.

For example, such a set of armor, there is basically no difference in the wearing effect of men or women.

Most of the time, the bust of women is not larger than that of men, so they can directly wear the same armor, especially the ancient armor is like a straight tube, and the wearer does not care about the chest to waist ratio at all.

As far as China's experience is concerned, there is no "female armor" that highlights women's sexual characteristics, especially in ancient times, bras were not used to support the breasts. Most of the time women's clothes are the same as men's, and the same is true of armor.

Ah, I remember that. does Goguryeo now have a mod too?

What era of Japan? Yayoi period？ Kofun era？

With the advancement of agriculture, millet was gradually replaced by rice and wheat in China, just as wheat replaced oats, rye and barley in Europe. People in the Han Dynasty generally ate millet as a staple food, but now we only use millet to cook porridge.

It was mentioned earlier that the paddy fields should be handed over to the Indians and Han's main crop is millet.

As a kind of memorial building, "paifang" was roughly formed in the Song Dynasty, before it was just the gate of an ordinary residential area. During the Han Dynasty, many of the current Chinese religions were immature, so there was a lack of buildings that could provide aura buffs.

I always don't want to leave what I already know to the next version, we can make Han Dynasty perfect enough in Alpha 26.

The faction of the Han Dynasty is still in a state of incomplete design. Only when the design is formed based on history is it suitable for a balanced discussion of the content. Otherwise like "laozimen", it doesn't make sense to include it in the balance discussion if we end up removing it, I'm stressing that.

The gameplay and the player's sense of substitution are based on our restoration of historical reality. Adding non-existent facilities is like introducing dragons and magic. It may be interesting, but it is divorced from the theme of the game.

The Han Dynasty also needs to be revised on the issue of historical authenticity. 1. The faction name should be called "Han". 2. Regarding the crossbow cavalry, although there are brick carvings to prove their existence, this kind of cavalry uses crossbows because they cannot use bows, not because the power of crossbows is stronger, so there is no need to exist as a unit. 3. Then there are special buildings. Han's current unique buildings have no historical basis. "laozimen" is completely fictional, so is the Imperial College. "guanshu" is the office of the local administrator, which is actually the core of a city. In other words, the government office is the civic center. 4. The information of Osprey Publishing referenced by the warship is unreliable and needs to be redesigned. 5. The melee cavalry of the Han army use pike or JI with both hands, so they are not equipped with shields, only cavalry with swords will use shields; the shape of the sword is also wrong, it is the style after the Ming Dynasty. 6. The Han Dynasty actually recorded a chariot with a winch crossbow, but the shape has not been properly restored, and it can be considered to be added in the future.

I think it's better to consider the issue of historical authenticity first, "laozimen" as a facility does not exist at all in reality.

In Chinese we use the term "摩揭陀mojietuo", which in English would be translated as "Magadha".

So far, the only diagrams of Chinese warships that can be referred to are those after the Song Dynasty. I have basic ancient books as well as modern research materials in my possession, but in Chinese. 271323228_()(z-lib.org).pdf 1136183969_.pdf 389120430_.27.pdf