Zaggy1024

That may just be because of mipmapping and/or antialiasing, although I think that bit of the texture map might not be the best quality. Yeah, the second floor would probably be pretty useless (and perhaps expensive) to a blacksmith.

It would be good to have animatable wings, like with the chicken, where they're normally flat against the body but can move independently. Nice job, though. You're definitely better at texturing than I am.

The leg joints have at least two loops (at least on the side it bends away from). You can give it more rounding on the side it bends away from, if you want to save polys. The tigers need to be very flexible. Don't be too conservative with polys on the joints, we don't want the transforms to be ugly. Also, make sure to keep the distances between the loops on the tail even.

I think the head's shape could use a little work, but other than that, nice job!

The tiger desperately needs a new model and texture. Also, take a look through the animal models in Atlas, some should be pretty obvious that need new models and textures. (low-quality textures, low-poly models, etc)

I just noticed something about the archer's icon... Something about the bow makes it look like the bottom is much longer than the top. I think perhaps the top wooden bit of it shouldn't bend back so far. Edit: Just saw the new ship icon. Looks really epic with sharp edges! Even at a small size, it still makes a big difference.

You should finish this, I think it would look fantastic in the game.

Heh, that's something I hadn't thought of either... I guess I haven't really done enough biped animations. Any time I'm animating a human, though, I do test out the movements, so I may have done that correctly without realizing it.

Your MLP drawings are making me think we should add a pony Easter egg.

What kinds of animations are you good at? Do you have any examples?

Basically what Amish said.

Enrique, the fact that the eyebrows and eyelashes don't end in points, like in the second reference you posted, bothers me a bit. perhaps you should repaint those?

You should try to make the halos look like the one in the archer's portrait, it looks way better, since it doesn't look like a cartoony outline. The archer looks great in the screenie, btw.

That's a bit better.

Just to expand on my post, it wouldn't be too hard for you guys to add a value to entity templates' projectile settings to multiply the gravity and therefore make the trajectory higher. Take a look at simulation/components/Attack.js.

Perhaps to make us able to have a lot of particles without too much worry about performance, when the number of particles goes above a certain amount, particles are chosen at random and removed? That way, it'll hopefully look okay even when particles start getting removed. (It doesn't look very good when you just delete the oldest particles, because then you can easily see particle trails start to disappear, which is UGLY)

Perhaps you should make the texture look a bit more washed-out, it doesn't really look like it's painted to me. Also, the eye shadow looks a bit sharp.

The size of these guys' hands bugs me, they seem to usually be a bit big... (not all of them, but the archer's bow hand seems pretty big to me)

It's your choice whether you have the textures all in one file or separate, it'll work either way. You should take a look at an actor that fires projectiles (like a javelinist). Do you have sections of your texture that have player color and transparency? If you don't, just separate the models into two separate files, one with faces that have player color, and one with faces with transparency, and attach one as a prop to the main actor (and set its material to what you need). I'm pretty sure that would require changing the engine (as well as JS). Edit: Actually, I'm not sure what you mean. If you mean a tall curve that comes down on its target, then it shouldn't be too hard to do with just a few JS changes. Have you had a programmer start working on adding turrets? If you do add them, I'm sure we'll be able to add them to the engine and use them ourselves.

Shrapnel or debris? Also, it would be cool if the debris could take a section of the building's texture it hits as its texture. Edit: But having debris appear when a projectile hits a building would probably require some kind of bounding box to detect hits, because otherwise the projectile would go straight through the building.

Having a modeled city with animated people would be way too much work for just a menu, I think... :\ It'll probably just have to be nice render maybe with some people painted in (or in-game models rendered in it). To make use of the parallax, we could put some clouds on it, too.

The tiger really just needs a whole new model, so if you could make that and a texture, that would be great. You might want to import the Asian elephant model to see how the joints are done.

It sure would be nice to have some kind of vertical offset option in Atlas for actors for this kind of thing... *hint hint*

So this post isn't completely pointless.

The thing about updated models and textures is a good point, but having it be a replay would mean loading times which may or may not be able to be completely masked by a 2D video before it.