Forums
.thumb.jpg.b21ca1d0c15fb56b42c39b25a0a40815.jpg)
.thumb.jpeg.6593e9caa97375b0d0fe3e8d0b0480a4.jpeg)
-
Who's Online 2 Members, 1 Anonymous, 2.659 Guests (See full list)
-
Latest updates
-
-
Newest Posts
-
By real_tabasco_sauce · Posted
Oh interesting. I hadn't heard the reasoning before but it makes sense. -
warcraft 3 and aoe 2 is 0,25 sec if i'm right, so it's ok -
Interestingly, there is a difference between HP and armor bonus when it comes to healing: the armor doesn't reduce healing as it does taking damage. That would make an armor bonus stronger than a HP one. When Ptolemies had this cavalry hero that gave extra 40% HP to pikemen in his aura, you could heal the pikemen faster by moving them out of the aura. I remember playing some games from the times before the exponential armor system, and there seemed to be a problem where if a unit or building had more armor points than you had damage points, you wouldn't be able to cause damage to it anymore. And so there was a hard-coded minimum of 1 HP damage (one other detail is that nowadays the HP uses the fractional part, even if it's not shown). That could mean that you were better off using a greater number of very weak units (like archers) because you had the the guarantee of at least 1 HP per arrow shot. -
By real_tabasco_sauce · Posted
turns are calculated 5 times each second, so depending on your input, there could be up to a 0.2 second delay for a unit to act on your orders. In laggy games with 8 players, this is exacerbated by slower players since simulation waits for the slowest players to "catch up". with substantial performance improvements, it could be lowered to 0.1 sec. -
did you try in 1vs1 with someone of your region? you will see , it's good
-
Hi all, wanted to give a little rant. For an RTS game where you are doing many actions very quickly and need a decent response speed from units having a reliable latency is needed. Its not fun for me when the there is a serious delay between my order and when it actually happens. In single player there is a delay as well but its much faster compared to pvp. Anyone else experience something similar? -
About zram, I would suggest starting to use lz4 (it should be faster) rather than zstd, given you already have plenty of RAM. Then, you may want to consider upgrading to Debian testing/13, it has already less known bugs than 12 ( https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ ) and it can support building 0ad using its packages, other than natively having 0ad 0.27.0.
-
