The problem was that they were inpersonnating us and refused any communication. Then when they saw it wasn't going great they tried to sell it to do a grift.. Other than that there was no issue. We didn't know what version they uploaded, if they added malicious software in it or anything.

If it's ambiguous I think we can still use it (better than nothing) - until a linguistic crowd proves us wrong.

I hope this is all that y'all need. Let me know if there's anything else that would help. crashlog.dmp crashlog.txt interestinglog.html mainlog.html system_info.txt userreport_hwdetect.txt

Hi @Auditry, welcome to the forums. If you'd attach your logs there are better chances someone can look into this. Link: %LocalAppData%\0ad\ E.g.: C:\Users\JohnDoe\AppData\Local\0ad\

Free Software can legally be sold (although I am not stating this is specifically the case of 0 A.D.) See this: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.en.html The word "Free" in "Free Software" can be misleading due to its ambiguous meaning. GNU and FSF clarify which interpretation should be given to the word "Free". Quoting from https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.en: [...] think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer.”