All Activity

Whut? There will be no hotfixes?!?!? Unacceptable!!!!! Here's the fix for this:

Bug Fixes for 0.28 Changelog: 0.28.0.1 - Rome can build Civilians from the start of the game again Bug_Fixes_0.28.zip

Ah, so the "real players" are only players on the lobby for you? You do know that vast majority of this game's player base is outside of the lobby, do you? This game cares not for your ideological feelings. Take that somewhere else, please. Now you sound like you're arguing about something that this change tried to correct. If you'd read the release statement, you'd know this. EDIT: On topic, thanks for the mod @Atrik. We should correct the voices in the next release.

What @guerringuerrin said, already better, the gendered civilians could be a good addition, but sharing audio with citizen-soldiers creates a small UX regression. Sound feedback matters. This thread isn't intended to be for a rejection the feature, however could be a highlighting for potential refinement. @guerringuerrin tried to orient the discussion on getting the sounds fixed but that didn't help .

I periodically encounter grammatical errors (sometimes even serious ones) or translation inaccuracies in the interface, unit and building names, and hints, and I'd like to quickly spot them and all similar places in strings. For example, I recently discovered that the term "Nabatean camel archer" (which should be translated as "camel-riding archer") was translated in one language as "Nabatean archer of camel" (belonging to a camel or descended from a camel). Or another example: First, in one sentence, a unit is mentioned in the singular, then in the next, in the plural. And so on...

Such a neat, helpful little mod, but its thread is taken over by a completely irrelevant discussion... Sad.

Hello everyone. Is there any detailed instruction how to get full text strings with English and someone another language ? It will be good to get the table or CSV file or something like that with english string and the translated string by specific another language. The purpose - to see all of this directly on the PC, to better search and overview. Using local text editor and so on... It's better to get it from localization portal, but I haven't found how to download it from transifex... May be it is possible direct from installed packages / folders on my PC (Windows) ? And of course I understand that the edition should be done only on transifex durring the specific period (before string freeze). Thank you in advance for any advice.

Thanks. That site should really be linked on https://play0ad.com/download/ somewhere.

@DesertRose All the previous releases are available at https://releases.wildfiregames.com/

Is there a way to get the download link or torrent for Linux 0.27? Or even better, can someone share the "public.zip" from game version 0.27?

Tabascos link:

where?

i didn't notice, that's funny! 1:03 in the video.

haha they even talk about 0ad in the chat. interesting

Normally there is no official patches/bugfixes between releases. Last version we had the community-mod which is sort of an "official mod" that was intended to fix this kind of bugs and also balancing issues. I don't know if we will have community-mod for this release. All these stuff depends on very few members of the community and sometimes it can't be hard to do the work. Keep in touch in the forum and there might be some news about these in the next months

@ittihat_ve_terakkiBro you claim to be someone "actually playing the game" as if no one else here does, and yet what makes you come onto the forum is an issue like this? Have you not heard about sniping, champcav, booming/turling issues, fanas, and all sorts of other gameplay issues that we discuss. Definitely it seems that theres something extra bothersome to you about this change that you haven't mentioned.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hf-62WEaVtY

Might as well introduce an option to spawn females/males civilians only, mix is the default in the "preference" setting. The idea is being able to satisfy old player base as well as future players. In my case I'm calling them Civilians nonetheless as they are the tags given in this version 28 and they are mixed now. Others call them "woman" despite the change and its fine, its a term for nostalgic players to indicate past terms for this new change moving forward as a tidbit in loading screen for new players.

Look, if you felt attacked or ofended in any way, I apologize. I don't want to portrait myself in an innocent way nor my intention was to attack you. I discuss arguments in a public forum about a public matter that many players are discussing. There's no need to tag me for me to answer you about what you put here. I didn't insulted you I didn't ordered you to shut up and is OK if you don't like the change. I'm not here to change your mind. But yeah if your argument is: I answer this is nonsense, or "this doesn't make sense". Because is an overexaggeration (or however is it spell. Not using chatgpt to avoid unnecesary comments) that leads anywhere. Why? Because you can use that argument to almost everything the game, which leads to doesn't even have a game in the first place. Yes, the change has some historical ground and I told you: And about this: Yes it adds confusion and nothing else. That's my point. I agree about the audio feedback, not about the models or because naming has changed from women to civilians Yes, I wanted to bring this up because that's kind of a very characteristic mechanic of the game and it's a naming used for years, and even today. I get your point about "talking about real matches in the lobby, what players actually say in-game, not forum terminology." I'm a real player too. I play almost everyday, for years. Yes in lobby we commonly say "bring your army", "javs", "javcav", "make soldiers" etcétera. Still I've seen ppl in lobby start using civilians for former women and they are not robots. You say "civilian" is artificial and I argued that too. What about "villagers", would be better? Less artificial from your POV? Is honest not ironical question. Women are still there and I don't think someone had the intention of removing them or undermine them. Because, as we were discussing here, the intention were not political. Were historical. I don't get if this is some kind of joke or irony. As far as I know there has been aura damage and other types of auras for a long time

I’m considering buying an Apple Silicon Mac in the near future, and I just was wondering what frame rates people get on M4 or M5 chips with settings on highest. Thanks.

Thanks for the reply. I expect we’ll be waiting a while for a bugfix, no?

Nope... I genuinely say: "I am currently initiating a large-scale demographic expansion program focused on the sustainable deployment of non-military economic personnel."

I think you’re the one losing context here, probably because you’re arguing in a language that you are not good at. I gave that example because you defended changing the name “Women” and said, “I’ve already seen many people adopt the term ‘Civilian’ without any issue.” And the examples you showed were messages from before the update anyway. No, the people who actually play the game don’t call them that. Maybe a small group on the forum approaches the issue from a nerdy, overly technical angle and see things with such classifications. But I’m talking about real matches in the lobby, what players actually say in-game, not forum terminology. You’ve portrayed yourself quite innocent here but that’s not how it happened. I was actually simply expressing my opinion in a normal way, I didn’t even tag you. Yet you jumped in with “And what you’re saying here is nonsense.” It wasn’t some calm, neutral “I just asked why it’s a bad change and now we’re discussing arguments, that’s all.” That’s not how it unfolded. I’m not sure whether to attribute this to a lack of language nuance or something else entirely. But if you genuinely value the idea of freely expressing opinions, then you shouldn’t immediately try to shut down views you dislike by labeling them as “nonsense.” Turning the issue into a kind of TG mainland with your allies and then framing it as “I was just sharing my opinion” doesn’t work. Yes it adds confusion and nothing else. That's my point. Politically speaking: Removing women altogether isn’t exactly a brilliant move either. I think it would have made more sense to keep the “women” unit and maybe even make it a better. Right now, the game has completely erased the only position women held. The “women” unit had its own unique role and abilities. Even her voice alone added a sense of balance to the game. Removing it now feels like an almost anti-women move. At least Ptolemaic hero Cleopatra is still around thankfully lol The update, claimed to bring “realism,” actually introduced wizards who deal things like “aura damage” into the game. If you genuinely say, “Let’s produce some CiViLiAnS” while playing, you are a robot bro.

How dare you....

Hi @Riley S. You are doing nothing wrong. I believe this is a bug from R28. You can check it out here: https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/issues/8735