AIEND Posted February 7, 2023 Report Share Posted February 7, 2023 1 小时前，wowgetoffyourcellphone 说： 然后在任何建筑物中为每个文明放置 1-2 个通配符技术（例如，我可以想象在雅典人的码头和迦太基人的船坞中放置 1 或 2 个特殊技术）。 我不会将此线程中的任何新的特定于单位的技术视为特定于文明的技术，因为它们已提供给具有这些单位类别的所有文明。 它们是特定于类的，而不是特定于文明的。 Indeed, for example, to strengthen the technology of swordsmen and archers, you only need to give civilizations with corresponding units. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
real_tabasco_sauce Posted February 7, 2023 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2023 On 29/01/2023 at 4:10 PM, real_tabasco_sauce said: it works out very well for persians. Look how the order is the same, so each upgrade is beneath the unit. 13 minutes ago, AIEND said: Indeed, for example, to strengthen the technology of swordsmen and archers, you only need to give civilizations with corresponding units. Yes, and for some civs, like I mentioned earlier, they align so that the upgrade is directly below each corresponding unit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion.Kanzen Posted April 15, 2023 Report Share Posted April 15, 2023 Back to the topic. I don't think these technologies are/were bad ideas, what happened to them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BreakfastBurrito_007 Posted April 15, 2023 Report Share Posted April 15, 2023 4 hours ago, Lion.Kanzen said: Back to the topic. I don't think these technologies are/were bad ideas, what happened to them? They will be an option to vote for in next alpha's release of the community mod. @real_tabasco_sauce made some changes with them to make them less vague in the units they apply to, and changed the accuracy tech to be more conventional. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.