Jump to content

Scythian Wonder: Royal Kurgan


nifa
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

823639534_Screenshot2025-11-08220121.thumb.png.8850efb9662e711a9aff2b0d260ee96e.png

 

Hi all,

I finally want to share the results of a project I've been working on for some time and abandoned several times in between. So here it is, the royal kurgan, a burial mound for a wonder for the scythians. Two main difficulties: (1) somehow make look interesting, what in references is just a bare hill and make it look built by humans (2) let an organic building blend in with the surrounding topography.

Concerning (1): It might look too busy, there might be better options for prop placement, player color is difficult to add, maybe too many different/ not fitting stone colours, maybe add flora?

Concerning (2): The underground part consumes a lot of tris, but the gravel stones blend in nicely with the ground also on uneven terrain. I don't know if it goes deep enough though.

Further references:

Spoiler

 

 

Some CC0 models I used:

 

Feel free to test from the zip I added and let me know. I also added 7 different steles and two stone heaps of different sizes:

313342474_Screenshot2025-11-08221451.thumb.png.1d473eafac38ce0af591b05e5aa6253a.png

 

This is how it would look without the reddish stones:

Spoiler

549927732_Screenshot2025-11-08213954.thumb.png.6e6a4f87c05cf47b6f8aedf791ed7f27.png

 

What is left to do: Choosing the final layout; maybe some colour adjustments; deleting all those hidden faces from the stones on the inside, tthen bake ao; checking on naming conventions, actor files and materials. Also the foundation is just prototype.

 

Edit: I played around with the colours a little bit, turns out that adding some warmth to the gravel base helps a lot, so the contrast between the grey and the reddish stones isn't that harsh. @wowgetoffyourcellphone do you think you could work from here? My skills with colours and picture editing are very limited.

 

 

862891456_kurgan0_28.1.zip

Edited by nifa
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said:

Maybe stop being so pretentious 

I am pretentious but I explained something in March 2023 and still you made the same mistake in October 2023:

And I know you saw the post I made in March 2023:

image.thumb.png.be4db5c5702712672c63f1a2448469f7.png

Edited by Genava55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Genava55 said:

What do you think Polovtsian Baba means?

As I said, I started this over a year ago, so when I took it back up, I might have forgotten details about earlier discussions. As far as what I remember, although these stone babas aren't necessarily scythians, the scythians had similar ones too, so I figured if there's not much artistic difference, we could use a HP model from later times.

Sculpting is a ton of work, so if there is an existing similar model, it's always welcome, even if it's not 100 % accurate. What about the other sitting baba, is it also historically wrong?

Anyway, I spent a lot of time to recreate the other steles you suggested here: https://wildfiregames.com/forum/topic/20550-civ-scythians/?do=findComment&comment=561420 I'm open for references and historical advice

Edited by nifa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said:

Honestly, something simpler looks great as well. Without all of the props on the hill. The base surrounded by stelae. 

 

iwwiNys.png

 

True. I was afraid it wouldn't look "wonderly" enough :D

Maybe in this case elevate the gravel base a bit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, nifa said:

You are welcome to sculpt 100 % historically accurate babas/steles yourself.

If you can't take criticism, don't participate in a community project.

6 minutes ago, nifa said:

Sculpting is a ton of work, so if there is an existing similar model, it's always welcome, even if it's not 100 % accurate. What about the other sitting baba, is it also historically wrong?

Besides the two Cuman statues, yes I think the others are not anachronistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...