Do Archer's Add Extra Arrows to a Buildings Defense?

[Thales]

Theoretically, garrisoned archers should be adding extra arrows to a buildings defense. Do they really?

I get the impression that garrisoned regular infantry also does that, so there may be no benefit to having archers in a building?

Of particular concern: community centers, military colony, stone towers, and castles.

[Deicide4u]

Any garrisoned citizen soldier or champion adds to the arrow count of those buildings. 

Garrisoned women don't add any. Try to send them into houses, instead. 

[Thales]

1 hour ago, Deicide4u said:

Any garrisoned citizen soldier or champion adds to the arrow count of those buildings. 

So there is really no extra benefit to garrisoning an archer in a building when compared to other infantry.

Where should archers be placed for extra arrow benefit?

Edited yesterday at 15:41 by Thales

[Deicide4u]

50 minutes ago, Thales said:

So there is really no extra benefit to garrisoning an archer in a building when compared to other infantry.

No, there is no extra benefit.

51 minutes ago, Thales said:

Where should archers be placed for extra arrow benefit?

There is no difference. All garrisoned soldiers give the same amount of arrows. Place archers either behind the fortification so they can pelt the enemy from afar, or inside the Civic Center/tower/Fortress. Preferably the later, as archers are very easy to kill.

[ffm2]

22 hours ago, Deicide4u said:

Garrisoned women don't add any.

To be pedantic: Maurian champion archer (woman) add arrows. Most healers (men) don't add arrows. Also the hero Hippocrates does not add arrows. "Per Unit" might be changed to "Per Solidier" to clarify this.