vinme

i mean if someone can achieve rank x on their smurf account i dont see an issue with letting them in given theyve proven their skill. diamond is for som1 who will surpass the gold players prob some pro coming form some top tier rts.

Came back recently and from what i can tell the game isn’t as popular as it used to be, at least at 1300+ level. Often no one is online and it’s difficult to find people to play with so I made this discord with hopes of making it easier for those who want to play to arrange and organize games be it 1v1 or TG, set up game times with others. Can be used for other purposes as well like general discussion, posting 0ad related videos or other media, organizing tournaments, Ect. Main goal is still finding games. Goal is to keep the discord clean and organized so it’s not a mess and finding games is simple. requirement to join is that one must be 1300+ Come and get verified through your in game account and get your rank. Ranks (appropriate color): Gold:(top 3), Silver-(1900+), Bronze-(1800+), Iron-(1600+), Pleb-(1300+) there is also a separate channel category for anyone Iron or above for improved ease of finding challenging opponents.(just to clarify there is a single separate category encompassing everyone 1600+ therefore they can use both the regular channels and the "high level" ones.) https://discord.gg/2q9mj9Bue2

Staratt def not smurf i played him several times from him being new to more experienced and he clearly improved. when he was newer he was making rudimentary mistakes, very high level in some areas while very lowe level in others. anyway where do i stand/used to when i played? forgotten so easily... even after wasting time writing so much @#$% on here

yes @Bings im like top 15-20 best 0ad player at least rn ik to update

can hardly find any games recently maybe its just me.any recommendations for good rts es? ik sc2 am thinking of getting impossible creatures,ik aoe.

the fact that you were completely incapable of disproving my statements and instead resorted to simply accusing me of being a troll only further solidifies my position and your lack of character.

censoring system doesnt even make sense.it accomplishes absolutely nothing.anyone can just write any other abbreviation of the swear word that they wanna say. only people who get mute really are the ones who forget to change the nonoword or make a typo. what is the purpouse even? there are also many swear words completely allowed and many some would say horrible rants in lobby about various horrible things much worse than swearwords. i say remove mute for swearing. the current mute for swear is unjust,unjustified and just plain wrong.

lol even censors it here XD

i was writing "counter" and wrote "o@#$%er" and got muted.. can i get unmute pls?

im just gonna write here to maybe make this thread pop up into "recent" hmm..bababa dadadaddsdsdsdasasadsdadsdsdasadsdada also maybe if top 8 players wont all agree to participate next highest rated must fill the slot.altho from the lack or response from those pinged im pessimistic

yeah you are right.i messed up on dogs i still think tehy op but we have to consider that the unit composition of an army makes it mathematically stronger than its counterparts like how 100 dmg 1 hp + 100 hp 1 dmg 2 soliders would destroy 2 dmg 50 hp 2 soliders. dps*hp isnt the complete determinant.still we can use math to calculate units value by also using dmg/hp proportions of the said unit to see how extreme it is compared to other units and go from there.i think all logn range entities need accuracy nerf.archer,cav archer,tower/ect.dont really see the need to reduce train time altho for cav i can see the reason behind it.for ele either do spear/pike counter or -10% hp dont do both altho i think coutner better.

i personally prefer option 2 to option 1 it seems more fun to me as option 1 many players wont have a chance to face each other and there has to be several games per 1v1 3 for reasonabe amount of games to build up.option 2 is both dynamic and provides a better variety of games.also option2 seems more funt to play in if i were a 1900 (rn 1730) id def wanna play in option 2 over option 1.

a24 invitational? never heard of it i assume it happened already? but glad to hear ppl doing tournaments. so 8 players 1v1 with 3 games each then 4 with 5 games each and then finals with total of 7 games? idk what Ro means but im guessing its that. not a bad idea so pretty much option 1 but more games per round.not gonna lie 7 for finals seems too much too me even 5 but if thats what the players would like that would be great more 1900+ games for me to watch and for u to hopefully commentate. civ rule is very good completely agree with it to create more diversity + ofc no advantages by both choosing without seeing the other persons civ. ur mod very op makes 0ad so much better and maps rly good too.2 last maps would be really interesting to define.to create more dynamic play it would be really good if there were 3-4 more maps either picked from already created maps or made in sandbox map maker thing in 0ad.although i dont see many more ideas for interesting unique maps.i think maps must be simple not to overload the already very complex gaming experience that is 0ad. 1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1 seems insane XD def fun to watch but we wont know who best from it.(iber would rule all in that game) man i really wish there was a way to make 0ad secure enough for prize pools but i wouldnt be putting in any effort in that as from last time i asked i recall it would be complicated.

the idea is to do a small tournament with only 1900+ players who are actively playing ranked 1v1s there being 8 of them. @ValihrAnt @borg- @scweinepriester(if som1 know his acc tag him) @Feldfeld @Stockfish @JC (naval supremacist) @superposition(also tag him please) @StarAtt question to players tagged above :would you play in the tournament? it should be easy to manage being a small tournament. option 1:there could be a regular system of 3 games per round per 2 player who would be randomly matched up. 3 rounds and 21 games. option 2:there could be every player playing 1 game vs the other 7 therefore there would be 7 rounds(or no rounds but manual time specifications) and 28 games total each win being a point and the player with most points wins.if certian players earn equal points there could be a tiebreaker. option 3:post any ideas below. option 2 seems more complicated to organize but the reason i like it is that it allows for more diverse games and fairer results with each player having the opportunity to face every other elite player of 0ad.option 2 is certainly the best way to decide who the best player is along with n2,n3,n4 ect. option 1 simpler and therefore involves less complications that may occur in option 2 such as:certain players just leaving if they lose too much early on/not trying as hard anymore,equal points making things longer,manual matchups could stretch out the tournament in time(i hope this can be avoided with only 8 players being easy to organize).

i dont see any reason to do the tests.

i didnt forget the attack look at my calculations the 12.8 is dps of javelins (16 per 1.25sec) yes range is relevant too but 9*2=18 not 12.8 since now it can be trained in p1 the imbalance is far more relevant.after p1 there are men around farms,a lot of men in woodline so you dont have enough time to mass dogs. clearly imba from stats alone the fact that it can be defended is irrelevant since real game results are irrelevant and biased because of variety of factors like the 2player match performance and also luck (not only in form of mapgen) dogs are 50% stronger than regular units stable to train them form is what? like 25,30% more affordable? at least than the regular barack,train time is menially longer by 3 sec than men. there really has to be 0 understanding of fudamentals of balance and also of third grade math to make such a mistake..and yeah i know im being mean but i dont see any other way to say this without watering down the obvious reality.

never fought vs dogs but clearly op from stats 110hp*1.1(armor multiplier)*9=1089 this is ignoring the far superior speed to inf/women compare that to lets say javeineer 50*1.1*12.8=704 compare that to lets say spearman 100*1.41*5.5=775.5 and spearmen having slightly higher score is fair since jav are faster so it balances out dogs have 13.5 speed wich is too high and are around 1.5 as res >value efficient as regular units just stat wise ignoring speed. this cannot be justified by the fact that they cannot eco since that becomes irrelevant if you use them to fight.

i dont understand your point here

fixed it.

guess its only me..im suspecting some new kind of ddos where the ddoser attacks in short bursts as to save resources? is that possible? since if they can disconnect you every 10-40 sec thats as good as disconecting you for good cuz you cant play. only started happening an hour ago so idk im gonna ping some ppl that i assume should know this? @Hannibal_Barca @Stan`

maybe every 30 sec or few min i keep disconnecting from lobby diconnected from specing a game.internet seems fine otherwise so not ddos

not ddos internet works fine

i get why he ddos ing other ppl but why me tho i never anger anybody im the nicest 0ad player around! got ddosed 3 times in a row maybe 4 vs boredrusher and bofer that a bunch too.anyway i guess i should get a vpn? and a new ip?if i get ddosed while having a vpn can i reconnect with another ip? hackermen pls help us (these r ppl i think r hackermen) : @nani @PhyZik @badosu @JC (naval supremacist) ... @go2die arent you like 14? how do you even understand any of this? i forget other hackermen if any1 knows pls add.

proscutto with tomato and mayo. make a grilled cheese like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hslqHUqCfPc&ab_channel=BoomerangOfficial but without the creepy wierd parts. also add fried bacon in there.dont overcook the cheese u just wanna melt it otherwise u get salty chewy dry greasy cr@p also use gouda or something like that instead of the cheese shown in the video.

i had forgotten writing this.. very fascinating stuff past vinme. deep,wise and brave a thinker easily hundreds of years ahead of his time. 10/10 would read again