Leaderboard

At Wildfire Games we try to create a safe and welcoming space for all players. As everywhere on the internet, this can be challenging. While we try our best to do so, we also rely on volunteering moderators from the community to help us to enforce our Terms of Use. While enforcement of rules is always subject to interpretation, there are some principles which guide the work moderators do: Moderators are expected to be role models and follow the Terms of Use. Moderators must not engage in conduct that would be considered harassment, coercion, or intimidation. Moderators must treat all players according to the same standards. There must be no arbitrary preferential or punitive treatment of individual players. In their role as moderators, they must only use official channels for communication, in particular only the official multiplayer lobby server, the official 0 A.D. IRC channels and the official 0 A.D. forums. Moderators must internally document the reasons and details of corrective actions they take. Moderators must not share details about corrective actions with people other than the involved parties, other moderators and members of Wildfire Games. Moderators must not share personal information about players they learned in their role as moderators with anybody who isn't a moderator or member of Wildfire Games. If you feel a moderator violated these principles or if you'd like to support us with moderation, please send a private message in the forums to @Dunedan. Aside from members of Wildfire Games the current community moderators are: @Norse_Harold @rossenburg @Palaiologos

Can you add some logs in the can apply method of aura.js ?

I have a little addition to that: I just noticed that OFTC offers the same +S channel mode as Libera.Chat. So all of the three mentioned IRC networks would support ensuring users are connected via a TLS-encrypted connection. I also verified that the official web clients of Libera.Chat and OFTC internally also use TLS-encryption when connecting to the IRC server to ensure that people using the web clients can join channels with mode +S.

Shortly after the time that the original author/maintainer of Phabricator announced his intention to stop maintaining it, the group of people who got together with an aim to continue/take over development and support used a service called Zulip to discuss how they'd do that. I remember feeling fairly impressed by the service at the time, as it seemed an improvement above my experiences with IRC, Gitter, and Matrix. It meets most of the criteria established at the top: TLS encryption between client and server; and all data is encrypted at rest be open source Source available on GitHub: https://github.com/zulip/zulip be libre, Apache 2.0 license be free, As an OSS project we'd be eligible for their "Standard" cloud package for free ideally not be self hosted or at least part of something we already host. Is cloud hosted (with self-hosting as an option) provide a web chat, for people not willing to install extra software A web client is available (as are desktop, mobile, and terminal clients) Tagging specific channels as public is possible, so no need to sign in to read chat should allow logging the channels for posterity Ability to export select (e.g. publicly viewable) channels into a static HTML archive, with incremental updates where possible - https://github.com/zulip/zulip-archive There's also bridges for IRC/matrix/XMPP/etc.; optional voice/video chat integration (Jitsi by default); private channels/topics; user administration & moderation; etc. Of particular interest to us, the service supports what it calls "linkifier"s - detecting phrases such as "D1234" and adding a hyperlink pointing to the relevant issue/commit/whatever. (How this appears in an exported archive I'm not sure.) And it supports integrations with gitea, trac, phabricator, transifex, jenkins. Anyway... just suggesting it as an alternative to what's been mentioned thus far. Thoughts?