-
Who's Online 4 Members, 2 Anonymous, 241 Guests (See full list)
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
Gracias por responder. Bastante sencillo, ahora me causa la duda, donde podría ver todas las posibles variables y tags que puedo modificar en los xml y json. Algo así como una documentación, o una lista de valores validos para implementar las tecnologias, las civs o los bonus de unidades.
-
By strat0spheric · Posted
if privileged from the moderators or whomever with the respective authority (i was just makin up ideas btw), they would not be normal players but admins and hence the term vigilantism won't apply. And i think you tend to think everything is related to you or eric or Akentas. Sorry, this is a general topic and i want the language to be better in this game. Because it kills my fun. It kills the fun of many players. It hurts, it offends. And if people don'T see anything is done against this culture, they will leave the game. And this is not a good prospect, because you know, i love this game. This is my only motivation behind my post ! -
By lucienjc99 · Posted
hello, the player named Vetsikas left the game after losing his army due to his own attack. it was a rated game. there is also another issue i would like to bring to your attention. in this game, Vetsikas was rated 1357, and this was only 3 days ago (june 10, 2026). today (june 13, 2026), Vetsikas is rated 1711. it appears that Vetsikas is inflating his rating by playing 1v1 matches against fake accounts (possibly bots). as you can see here, even though the game start time is 19:14, the account "muricaa234" resigned twice at 19:14. that's two wins within a single minute. In some of the chat logs (I share), he even appears to acknowledge the situation himself, implying that these accounts are bots. He also makes comments such as, "I will show up on the leaderboard, and you will look at me" in addition, he regularly hosts rated games with the 0 minute wonder victory condition enabled. he then invites people to play 1v1 matches. since many players do not carefully check the settings, Vetsikas quickly advances to phase 3, builds a wonder, and immediately "wins" the game. when people complain, he often responds by accusing them using various manipulative arguments. i do not know whether the administration will take any action against a player who reached 1711 rating within 3 days under these circumstances. however, at the very least, people have a right to know that he is a scammer and should be aware of his behavior. thank you for your time. -
By lucienjc99 · Posted
hello, the player named Vetsikas left the game after losing his army due to his own attack. it was a rated game. there is also another issue i would like to bring to your attention. in this game, Vetsikas was rated 1357, and this was only 3 days ago (june 10, 2026). today (june 13, 2026), Vetsikas is rated 1711. it appears that Vetsikas is inflating his rating by playing 1v1 matches against fake accounts (possibly bots). as you can see here, even though the game start time is 19:14, the account "muricaa234" resigned twice at 19:14. that's two wins within a single minute. In some of the chat logs (I share), he even appears to acknowledge the situation himself, implying that these accounts are bots. He also makes comments such as, "I will show up on the leaderboard, and you will look at me" in addition, he regularly hosts rated games with the 0 minute wonder victory condition enabled. he then invites people to play 1v1 matches. since many players do not carefully check the settings, Vetsikas quickly advances to phase 3, builds a wonder, and immediately "wins" the game. when people complain, he often responds by accusing them using various manipulative arguments. i do not know whether the administration will take any action against a player who reached 1711 rating within 3 days under these circumstances. however, at the very least, people have a right to know that he is a scammer and should be aware of his behavior. thank you for your time. @user1 @Chasca @Dunedan @Stan` commands.txt metadata.json -
By strat0spheric · Posted
thank you @Akentas for refining and adding some thoughts. I also think these ingame moderators should follow a clear and published Code of Conduct. And if they abuse power, there privileges should be withdrawn of course. The sanctions should have a clear response to given escalation level. first mute.... then timeout and so on ... bans only for repeated misbehaviour.
-
