Short answer: not really. It still needs a lot of work (I think the ai I am using is not very good, it is free, so that would make sense). So, sorry . But if you want to help, you can see the github repo on the first topic, or one of the later ones, and I can add you as a collaborator 

I’m too lazy to read the entire thread, but here’s my general opinion on this topic: AI Art: No, it looks fake and will give us a bad image. AI Music: We don’t really need more music or sound effects, and any new stuff can easily be found, or made. AI Writing/Translation: I mean, not really needed, but in general we should avoid this. AI Code: This is fine imo, as long as an experienced coder looks through it and makes adjustments. Also, I think using AI to quickly run through your code for bugs is a good idea, even if we generally decide to avoid AI otherwise  

Does it work? Like, I can use it to edit code and stuff?

Actually tbh that would be cool for walls and towers.

I don't want to argue in favour of removing support for devices, but... Most arguments are silly (or in Lundukes language: hilarious) "There are issues reported for drivers with no known issues." Yes that's why the issues are reported... "The year 2002. Very very recent in my opinion." When the hardware support is now removed and the already released kernels get supported for maybe 5 years (I think that's how that works), It will be supported for 30 years. I wouldn't call that "Very very recent". "The drivers haven't do be updated in years and years and years" When there is no one maintaining it there is software rot. "Wasn't the point of using AI to make development more efficient‽" AI is used to find bugs and to write code. When the kernel developers wouldn't use AI to find bugs someone else would. When they wouldn't use AI do write code - yes - they would be less efficient. "Back in the days every week we said that something became supported by Linux" Maybe you could do the same thing now.