All Activity

Halo Grow: The Future of Hair Regrowth is Now in a Spray Bottle" Halo Grow Hair loss is one of the most common concerns facing both men and women today. From genetic predispositions to hormonal changes, stress, or even chemical damage, thinning hair can feel like a never-ending battle. Enter Halo Grow Hair Spray—a scientifically backed topical solution that has quickly become a game-changer in the world of hair restoration. Designed to block DHT (the hormone responsible for most hair loss), purify the scalp, and reawaken dormant hair follicles, Halo Grow is offering new hope to millions dealing with thinning hair. Halo Grow But what exactly is Halo Grow, and how does it work? Let’s dive deep into what makes this topical spray one of the most promising hair growth solutions on the market today. What is Halo Grow? Halo Grow Hair Spray is a DHT-blocking, scalp-nourishing topical formula designed to promote hair growth and reduce visible shedding. Unlike oral supplements that must be digested and metabolized, Halo Grow is applied directly to the scalp, where it can more effectively target the hair follicles—the actual roots of the problem. Halo Grow Formulated with carefully selected ingredients known for their hair-enhancing benefits, this lightweight spray works to purify the scalp, improve follicle health, and encourage the appearance of thicker, fuller, and shinier hair. It’s suitable for both men and women and claims to support hair recovery from various causes, including: · Genetic predisposition (androgenetic alopecia) · Hormonal imbalances · Stress-related hair fall · Chemical damage from styling products or treatments Key Benefits of Halo Grow Halo Grow isn’t just another spray-on solution. It is a multifunctional formula designed to enhance the overall health and appearance of your hair. Here's what sets it apart: 1. DHT-Blocking Power One of the leading causes of hair thinning and loss in both men and women is Dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a hormone that binds to hair follicles and shrinks them over time. Halo Grow contains ingredients that help neutralize DHT activity at the scalp, thereby reducing its damaging effects on hair follicles. 2. Nourishes the Scalp Halo Grow A healthy scalp is the foundation of strong, beautiful hair. Halo Grow is enriched with ingredients that cleanse and rejuvenate the scalp, creating an ideal environment for new hair growth. It helps remove product buildup, excess oils, and environmental toxins that can clog follicles and stunt growth. 3. Awakens Dormant Hair Follicles One of the most compelling claims made by Halo Grow is its ability to "awaken" dormant follicles. By reactivating inactive hair roots, it encourages natural regrowth in areas where hair has thinned or stopped growing altogether. 4. Reduces Shedding OmniHear Consistent use of Halo Grow has been reported to visibly reduce shedding, which can be a game-changer for people dealing with daily hair loss on brushes, pillows, and in the shower. 5. Improves Hair Texture and Shine Beyond promoting growth, Halo Grow enhances the look and feel of your hair. Users have noted that their hair feels softer, looks shinier, and appears significantly healthier after just a few applications. How Does Halo Grow Work? Clairu The magic of Halo Grow lies in its direct-to-scalp delivery system. Because it’s applied topically, the active ingredients are absorbed more efficiently by the hair follicles compared to oral supplements. Each spray delivers a concentrated dose of nutrients and DHT blockers straight to the scalp, allowing for targeted action where it's needed most. This method ensures quicker absorption, fewer systemic side effects, and a more localized effect. Clairu While the exact proprietary formula isn’t disclosed publicly, Halo Grow reportedly contains a blend of: · Botanical extracts known to improve blood flow and stimulate growth · Amino acids and peptides to support follicle strength · Antioxidants to protect the scalp from oxidative stress · Moisturizers to hydrate the skin and improve elasticity Who Can Benefit from Halo Grow? Clairu Halo Grow is designed to be gender-neutral and can benefit a wide range of individuals, including: · People experiencing genetic hair thinning · Those recovering from stress-related hair fall · Women dealing with postpartum or menopausal hair loss · Individuals affected by over-styling or chemical treatments · Anyone who wants thicker, fuller, and shinier hair Clairu Because it’s non-invasive, Halo Grow is also a good option for people who are not ready or willing to undergo hair transplants, take prescription drugs, or use messy oils. Application and Usage How to Use Halo Grow Hair Spray: · Start with a clean, dry scalp. · Part your hair in the thinning areas. · Spray a small amount directly onto the scalp. · Gently massage the product into the scalp using your fingertips. · Use once or twice daily for best results. Credifence Pro tip: Use Halo Grow consistently for a minimum of 8–12 weeks to start seeing noticeable changes. Hair growth is a gradual process, and consistency is key. What Users Are Saying Numerous review sites have praised Halo Grow for being lightweight, non-greasy, and pleasantly scented. Users have reported: · Noticeably reduced shedding within 3 weeks · Fuller-looking roots within 2 months · Improved shine and softness after the first few uses · No irritation or greasy residue Halo Grow While individual results vary, the general consensus seems overwhelmingly positive. Pros and Cons Pros · Targets the root cause (DHT) of most hair loss · Topical delivery ensures effective absorption · Suitable for all hair types and genders · No oral side effects · Promotes healthier scalp conditions Cons · Requires consistent use · Not a “quick fix” – results take time · Availability may be limited to online platforms Final Verdict: Is Halo Grow Worth It? Halo Grow If you’re dealing with thinning hair and looking for a non-invasive, easy-to-use solution that promotes healthier growth from the roots up, Halo Grow Hair Spray is definitely worth considering. Its scientifically supported approach, combined with its ability to nourish the scalp, reduce shedding, and reactivate dormant follicles, sets it apart in a saturated market. Plus, its lightweight, topical formulation makes it both convenient and gentle enough for everyday use. Halo Grow No single product is a miracle cure, but Halo Grow appears to be a powerful ally in your hair regrowth journey. Official website: https://halogrow.org.uk/ https://halogrow.com.au/ https://halogrow.ca/ https://halogrow.co.uk/ https://halogrow.de/ https://halogrow.net/ https://omnihear.org.uk/ https://clairu.org.uk/ https://clairu.com.au/ https://clairu.net/ https://clairu.de/ https://credifence.org.uk/

You’re absolutely right labeling all non-champion, non-mercenary units as "citizen soldiers" overlooks the complex social hierarchies of ancient societies. A more accurate term like "Worker-Soldier" could better reflect their mixed roles and limited rights, especially in places like Athens or Sparta. For more insights, visit https://nursely.org/clep.

"Non-cheating" here implies that the AI doesn't get gather rate bonus. "All seeing" is a cheat, but it is a technical trade off for not having to give the AI complex scouting logic. I don't care if the AI sees everything, but I do care if it gets significant resource advantage.

Since back then (AOE2) I liked one ally and four enemies. Makes every game different. And teaming the enemies up boosts the difficulty. Did you somewhere establish what "non-cheating" is? I consider "all seeing" cheating, so... (Not complaining, just saying.)

The AI sends its only hero to die in its first attack. The hero dies, so the AI instantly lose. Make the hero stay in home base, near the Civic Center. I can see that the "retreat" trigger activates when the hero is at low health, but it doesn't work very well on slow infantry and Elephant heroes.

I partially agree, but you don't have to attack the fortified positions to be ahead. In fact, you should ignore the buildings and go after the enemy's gatherers. In multiplayer games, people will resign once they see you are far ahead. This is possible even in P1.

It's a mod with better AI. Check the mods in the Mod dowloader. You might first try winning against a unmodded Medium AI, though. It's the highest non-cheating difficulty that still can pose a good challenge if you procrastinate and let it build up.

I don't remember if it has already been suggested, but what would really better the game would be secondary objectives, and especially in P2. I mean, it's nearly impossible to attack an enemy fortified area before siege units in P3, which means the gameplay lacks diversity. We'd need things to fight for in P1 (like treasures/relics, but ones which would be revealed at the beginning of the game, to remove the randomness of getting there first if you don't know the map already). Note that many maps have Gaia buildings, but it's never (AFAIK) explained whether they have their own roots (some have, so are nice to capture early) or not (most of them don't, which makes them nearly useless to capture early). A few nice-to-have-but-not-totally-unbalancing buildings with their own root territory clearly established, and revealed at the beginning of the game, could be nice. Like towers, houses, markets, storehouses, farms... One map at least have temples with their own roots, it's a bit strong imho but why not. Not necessarily all treasures and relics and buildings-with-their-own-roots need to be revealed at the beginning of the game, it's fine to reward exploration, but a few important ones should. And all buildings should make clearly visible if they have their own root territory ! Of course those revealed at start should be at a minimum distance from the players' starting position (basically no treasure should be closer to one player than to at least another one, and other rewards should still be relatively far away, so that a player sending troops to it can get there before the closest player has finished to capture it if he did send only one citizen soldier). And in P2, we should have things that resist attacks by non-siege units (like garrisoned towers) and simple, unprotected battering rams that can take them down (but slowly, and also are vulnerable to counter-attacks : basically no armor, even against pierce). Not sure what the equilibrium should be concerning resource gathering : we'd want something that can be built in the open (to serve as a secondary objective for the enemy), that is resistant to non-siege units once garrisoned but can be taken down by these P2 rams. But also not something that makes it too easy to build outside territory, so as not to compete unfairly with the Kleroukia or Town Center. Maybe something that take nearly as much time to build than a Kleroukia, doesn't cost metal and costs only 50 or 100 Stone ? With less hit points, less garrison, and way less territory around it ?

What is it ? I wasn't aware of it... Does it cheat ? As written above, I don't like that.

Thanks. I wasn't aware of difficulty levels for the AI. I really dislike cheating AIs, though. What is the highest level where it doesn't cheat ? Note also that I'm absolutely not asking for advice on how to play against AI. I like discovering myself what works, it's the most enjoyable part of the game. My question was about how many AI opponent to choose (eventually, how many allies too - allies are good for trade, but it's quite random how long they survive, which is something I don't really like). And, for high level of opponents, what level of cheating (additionnal resources mostly) is acceptable and makes for a game that is both fun and challenging.

It is easier to "download" if you use flatpak. See the graphic associated with the post cited below.

Hard AI - Random behavior. Pop either 200, 300 (testing strats for multiplayer), or unlimited (for just monster war fun). Starting RSS Low or Normal. When it's on Hard mode - they've got a 25% gather buff, so they WILL have an army before you, 99% of the time. I find it helps to train a few cav (typically 5-7) at around 30-pop to do more hunting for food, but also to tank the first attack so archers/javs can knock it out. That first attack isn't usually more than a few units, so you can quickly grab everyone to fight it then return to work. I've found as well, after watching some people in my multiplayer games, town setup matters. A storehouse on a border woodline WILL distract any troops controlled by AI enough for you to gather the forces to repel. houses close together helps break up a formation and funnel troops in one-by-one rather than a mass blob. Hope that helps.

There are in fact battles that Rome won because of Elephants, maybe not many of them given the shortish time frame, but they are there. As for why or why not, I think its cool enough to be worthwhile, not everything has to be legionary focused in Roman civs.

Yep

https://code.wildfiregames.com/D368 @bb_ Made a patch some time ago. Secondary attack.

Nowadays, I always play against Hard Balanced AI. I've tried playing against the Hardest, but found no major difference in difficulty. There's also Petra Expert AI mod if you need more challenge. The AI gets bonus gathering speed at levels greater than Medium. It also trains larger armies more quickly. However, you will beat it easily if you're a decent player.

Linux Download page is still not working, btw: https://play0ad.com/download/linux/ If someone wants to look at the code to start modding I assume you can start here: https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/wiki/BuildInstructionsGettingTheCode ? Is that right?

I always play by myself with the computer opponent. Therefore, delenda est is particularly interesting to me because it offers many development options and more building alternatives. It's certainly been discussed before, but it's a shame that the Roman legionaries aren't able to throw the pilum. For example, you could switch it around like with the Immortals. Easy for me, as a non-programmer, to say. It would, however, make the history more accurate. The Romans were the absolute world power in ancient times, also based on this tactic. Likewise, military camps are inferior to the military colonies of the Phoenicians or Seleucids. It's the same with shipping; galleys were both capable of long-range weapons; above a certain size, they had long-range weapons on board and could ram or board ships. Of course, I don't want to dictate anything to the other players; I like the authenticity of the figures and the painstaking attention to detail, and the gameplay isn't that important to me. I would also like to have optional raider gangs or pirate ships, in addition to treasure. That's why I particularly like the Danubius map. This way, everyone can shape their game the way they want. Otherwise, I really like the game... please never stop...

Finally won 1v7 on againt very hard AI with open map. Earlier used ibr to play xd. Was hard but nothing is impossible with gauls, given you can spam fanatcis then switch to melee champ cavs. @SaidRdz, @Player of 0AD, thats how to you do it

I played a lot of lame games against AI but now I begin to understand how to make 0ad games more interesting. So I'd like to ask what settings players use to make their AI games interesting ? The problem I have is that too little AIs make the game boring, but too much make their first attack nearly impossible to repel without cheating, so in both cases the gameplay is boring. I guess that some cheating may be fine against more than 3 opponents (all allied; games against non-allied opponents are too random) but I don't know which exactly will make the game fun (basically, some wood with "bring me my axe" to get some palisades in order to survive the first attack and then counter-attack I guess, but how much would be reasonable ?).

Honestly, Roman elephants dont sit right with me. Elephants never played a significant role in Roman victories (or defeats) AFAIK. We have civilizations which lack basic units like infantry javelins, not because they never used them but because they never played a significant role for them (i mean all civs have spears someone must have figured out to throw it). Romans are already diverse and they will neither gain from having elephants nor lose from not having them.

A merc elephant would be great As a thought experiment I would assume a full metal cost, which going off the smaller African elephant would be 450 metal in total after converting food cost to metal. Given training is faster, and also knowing the limited acquisition that Rome has from Numidia, I would run with the elephant stables but cap it at 1 or maybe 2 buildings, that way production should be slower than other civs who could spam like four or five elephant stables so they can mass them fast. A cool side affect would be that now a Roman player could use captured elephant stables, which would be a fun niche feature.

Six to be exact. unit focus is fine but does not have to dictate everything. Not sure what exactly you mean by additional unit roster, their roster is still the same after the reforms tech.

I agree.As a non-roster mercenary unit it's fine.

We already have a lot of civs which have access to War Elephants. Romans have focus on infantry and siege. They are also currently the only civ with an additional unit roster. I think they are fully covered now, but I would like to see the return of Donkey-pulled Scorpio cart. Romans have an abstract technology called "Roman roads", which provides a small speed boost. I'd say that the idea is fun, but this is not a City building simulation game. This is a fun idea, Praetorians had this feature. Again, would make this into a City building simulation game. The players already need to worry about positioning for their structures, we shouldn't make it worse. For anyone who played Metal Fatigue, you know how annoying this can be. Or fun, depending on if you're the one who built a huge tank and artillery army underground and are now wrecking the enemy's base.