Jump to content

Lobby Help and Moderation

user1

By user1,
in General Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

sternstaub Duplicarius

sternstaub

Posted
Posted
On 01/09/2022 at 12:31 AM, Norse_Harold said:

How about adjusting the policy so that it's flexible? We could require such users to fill out a form requesting an override to the new account creation rate limit. Then an admin reviews the application and allows on a case-by-case basis.

...or have the ability to apply advanced registration restrictions for only the time when a DDoS attack is actually happening? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

user1
user1

Some thoughts about the current state of lobby moderation: Smurfing wasn't noticed (as much) as a problem in the past because I was actively preventing it. But it isn't obvious that it is a sever

maroder
maroder

Disclaimer: I don't frequent the normal lobby, so everything that I experience as problems regarding this topic is based upon the topics I've read here on the forums/ heard from other team members.

Norse_Harold
Norse_Harold

If there is no one with the official role in WFG of drafting legal terms, then the word responsible is still appropriate. It means who has accepted the responsibility for this task? If collecting

Posted Images

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...