Why can't houses hold men?

[oddchild]

To me it makes sense that you should be able to throw people into the houses for safety, but also to mount a defence. Especially the stone houses that seem more sturdy. Just seems natural that soldiers would want to defend their homes...

[Romulus]

It's quite simply because the women kicked the men out the houses lolz

[Prodigal Son]

I believe it's for gameplay purposes, preventing you to have your entire army protected unless you build walls. Towers, forts and city centers act as defensive points, while only large walled cities can host an entire large army, so it makes some real sense as well. Fight for your homes (in your homes) is more of an "everything's lost" scenario anyway, not an advisable strategy.

[WhiteTreePaladin]

Things are still subject to change. I would guess that we probably won't allow garrisoning in houses at some point, but nothing is final.

[sanderd17]

Things are still subject to change. I would guess that we probably won't allow garrisoning in houses at some point, but nothing is final.

We do, but just females.

[WhiteTreePaladin]

Right, but that may very well be removed at some point.

[oddchild]

would be fun for ambush.

[thamlett]

We already have hand-to-hand fighting in the streets

Then we will have more urban fighting

LOL

PS

Good idea, anyway

I hope it comes out later