Phaedros Posted October 19, 2012 Report Share Posted October 19, 2012 (edited) So I'm trying to come up with ideas for the Asian civilizations, but I'm running into a few issues, firstly Japan, I'm kinda at a loss since there wasn't much going on in the Yayoi period (which lines up with 0 A.D.), then there's China, they have about 3 different dynasties during the 0 A.D. time period, however Korea was pretty stable until 108 BC when Gojoseon collapsed which gave way to the Three Kingdoms period of Korea...So I guess what I'm getting at is should I just name them as such: Chinese, Japanese, Koreans? And would anyone want to collaborate and see if we can flesh out these civs to be added later? O.o Edited October 19, 2012 by Phaedros Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MishFTW Posted October 19, 2012 Report Share Posted October 19, 2012 We've somewhat started discussing in this thread. Han Chinese are probably the most likely to make it into the game... remember additional civs can be downloaded when the game is completed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilstewie Posted October 19, 2012 Report Share Posted October 19, 2012 (edited) I definitely hope the Hans make it to part 1.It's too big and important. Edited October 19, 2012 by lilstewie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorfinn the Shallow Minded Posted October 20, 2012 Report Share Posted October 20, 2012 Out of curiosity, why do you want it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oshron Posted October 20, 2012 Report Share Posted October 20, 2012 the Japanese can work as a civilization, just not in Part 1; the most notable period in Japanese history that falls into 0ad's timeframe is the Yamato period from about 250-710 ADthe Chinese could potentially have three factions devoted to them--the Wei, the Shu, and the Wu--if they can be made distinct enough from each other. another possible inclusion is the Xiongnu, who were basically the equivalent of the Mongols in their time (and were eventually absorbed into Chinese culture). notably, the Mongols themselves would have to be excluded since they were a non-entity during 0ad's timeframe. for the Koreans specifically, i would suggest the Kaguryo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMST Posted October 21, 2012 Report Share Posted October 21, 2012 the Chinese could potentially have three factions devoted to them--the Wei, the Shu, and the Wu--if they can be made distinct enough from each other.I think having two factions depicting the Warring States/Qin and the other the Han would work better. The Three Kingdoms were not terribly different from each other and the Han period, I believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oshron Posted October 22, 2012 Report Share Posted October 22, 2012 (edited) a fair point, though im not sure the differences between the Qin and Han dynasties are really distinct enough to warrant being separate factionsincidentally, i actually collected a fair amount of information on Han Chinese arms and armor for a Deadliest Warrior take-off on another board (which would have pitted a group of Han Warriors against a Persian Immortals). here's what i had for that:Armor: scale corselet of leather and iron, possibly with a protective layer of black lacquer (the lacquer dates to the Qin rather than Han), and lamellar cuirass; shoulder guards and helmet, though leather caps were more common historically ((skirmishers usually lacked armor while mainline infantry were well-protected, and officers had heavier armor))Weapons: dao (saber), ji (halberd), zhuge nu (repeating crossbow), jian (double-edged straight sword; might be superfluous with the dao), wooden shield reinforced by a metal center and rimthere's also this that i wrote up for my own reference long before that:221 BC: unification of China under Qin; Imperial Era last 15 yearsQin emperor standardized writing systems, weights, and coinage; made the private possession of weapons illegal; established a road and canal system to quickly deploy troops; a centralized empire became the norm for the rest of Chinese historythe greatest threat to Qin and Han China was nomadic confederations such as Xiongnu; the nomads used fast horse archers which were much faster than Chinese soldiers, so thee Chinese built the Great Wall and used diplomacy and bribesQin general Meng Tian ousted the Xiongnu from the OrdosMaodun conquered Eastern Han and drove out the Yuezhithe Great Wall required 10,000 men to keep it in Chinese hands, plus 50-60 thousand citizen-soldiers in the frontiers to reduce costs of supplying them; a professional army emerged to compensate for the farmers' lack of cavalry skill, which consisted of Han mercenaries, convicts, and subjugated Xiongnu31 BC: Han China abolished universal conscription, and the borders extended from the Yangtze to Vietnamcavalry became more important as time went onthe Xiongnu lived in what is now north and western China, Mongolia, Central Asia, and Korea; after conquering them, the Chinese had to hold the territories against revolts by such people as the Qiang, Xianbei, and Xiongnuthe Qin utilized conscripts; by Eastern Han, the army was mostly volunteers and conscription could be avoided by paying fees or giving the government supplies, horses, or slavesthe end of Han China had a huge agrarian uprising that was quelled by governors who formed their own armies, and the central army was dissolved and ultimately led to the Three Kingdoms periodWei China's army depended on the Buqu that made a hereditary military career for certain families, meaning that a male relative would have to replace a soldier if he died (like in Mulan ); the hereditaries made up the bulk of the infantryWei cavalry was similar to the Han in that they hired the Xiongnu, and provincial armies became the bulk of the Wei army; the central army was a reserve forcethe Chinese invented the stirrup304 AD: Jin China collapses in civil war and the Xiongnu under Liu Yuan rebel, forming the Five Barbarian Tribes, or Wu Hu316 AD: Jin China loses all its territory north of the Huai, and north China is ruled by Sinicized barbarians like the Xianbei, while south China remains Han in the Era of Division. this made the separate militaries diverge and develop very differentlythe Northern Chinese armies were based around nomadic cavalry but used Chinese as foot soldiers and siege personnel, but was ineffective and they were mostly destroyed by the Jin or Xianbei468 AD: Xianbei take north china; Northern Wei created the earliest equal field land system and fubing system; fubing HQ commanded 1000 farmer-soldiers each for wartimeTang China had large contingents of heavy infantry. A key component of the success of Sui and Tang armies, just like the earlier Qin and Han armies, was the adoption of large elements of cavalry. These powerful horsemen, combined with the superior firepower of the Chinese infantry (powerful missile weapons such as recurve crossbows), made Chinese armies powerfulFanzhen = local general (hero?)the Tang used Arab mercenariesSong China relied on late Tang gunpowder weapons and bribes to fend off enemies such as the Khitan, Tangut, Jurchen, and Mongols; they used fire lances, cast-iron gunpowder bombs, rockets, China's first navy Edited October 22, 2012 by oshron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllenY Posted November 20, 2012 Report Share Posted November 20, 2012 I would like the Hans too, I'm CHinese myself. I know they had very good long range weapons, e.g. crossbows, trebuchets, etc. and they were much better than the European model. They also had a much stronger cavalry department. I'm pretty sure gunpowder weapons weren't around back then though.Add the Vietnamese maybe, with fast, agile troops and little perks. They weren't really an open field battle type. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllenY Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 Are Eastern civilizations ever going to be implemented as part of the actual thing though, not as a mod? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro Falcão Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 Are Eastern civilizations ever going to be implemented as part of the actual thing though, not as a mod?Depends on what eastern civs you're talking about. Persians and Indians are eastern. I can't remember all the civs of part 2, but it'll at least the Huns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllenY Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 I mean Far and Central Eastern, e.g. China, Japan, Vietnam, Siberia, etc. It seems like they are all from a mod and that only neareastern nations will be in the real game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oshron Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 i think the official inclusion of East Asian civs will be inevitable, but Part 1 of 0ad should just focus on the current scope: the Roman world from 500-1bc (Mauryan India notwithstanding) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro Falcão Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 i like the idea, i think the team with time they will accept that, because actually are many people that want participate in the make 3D arts, Programming, Sound and others. that people can make possible create more stuff quickly.I think the team is grateful when someone decides to provide a new civ stuff. They want a reasonable number of civs, but they can't compromise themselves with a large number, after all we all have our own businesses to take care of, uh?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllenY Posted November 24, 2012 Report Share Posted November 24, 2012 Another Eastern civ, Gokturks, they were sort of Caucasian sort of Mongol, they had an empire that stretched from Mongolia to Caucasus, most of south Siberia, Most of North silk road area. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.