zoot Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 Totally off-topic, but I think we can all relate to the enterprising spirit: NASA's Mars Science Laboratory mission is landing its rover, Curiosity, on the face of Mars tonight at around 05:31 UTC (in about 9:31 hours at the time of writing).NASA TV will be broadcasting throughout the event.Good luck, Curiosity! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MishFTW Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 Curiosity is very interesting. Its the first rover to land via sky-crane and it also run on nuclear power So no ugly solar panels. Thanks for sharing dude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pureon Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 Hope it lands safely - the landing phase sounds perilous Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoot Posted August 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 Hello from Mars.In a few days, there will be hi-res video for the first time from another planet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Almin Posted August 6, 2012 Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 (edited) Curiosity is very interesting. Its the first rover to land via sky-crane and it also run on nuclear power So no ugly solar panels. Thanks for sharing dude I hope that included irony , well at least I think so...totally off-topic, but are we starting a discussion about nuclear power? Edited August 6, 2012 by Almin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gen.Kenobi Posted August 6, 2012 Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 Black and white? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoot Posted August 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 Black and white? The images? The ones above were taken from its low-res 'hazcam' which is used by its on-board computer to avoid unforeseen hazards like pits and rocks. Once its mast is deployed, we'll get hi-res true color images (heck, they'll even be stereoscopic). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MishFTW Posted August 8, 2012 Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 @Alim I'm always ready for a debate. I call affirmative! But we need a debate moderator and topic (pertaining to nuclear power). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoot Posted August 9, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 This is from the first 360-degree panorama in color of the landing site taken by the Curiosity rover. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gen.Kenobi Posted August 10, 2012 Report Share Posted August 10, 2012 Does it already has some HD recording? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoot Posted August 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2012 Does it already has some HD recording? Not yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gudo Posted August 10, 2012 Report Share Posted August 10, 2012 The big problem with getting back HD video (which we are going to get, eventually) is the bandwidth. HD images and video have a TON of information, and the earth is very very far away. Considering the limited size and power available for radio equipment, sometimes I'm surprised we get anything back at all! The data is sent in binary, which is all 1s or 0s. Suppose the rover wanted to say "cat," it would send back "011000110110000101110100." The odds of one of those digits being received as the other is actually pretty high, so the rover sends everything in multiples. So instead of sending the above example, the rover would send "000011111111000000000000111111111110000111111110000000000000000111100001111111111110000111100000000" We just quadrupled our message size. Now if we get back a 0010, we know it's supposed to a 0. Consider the size of HD files, then remember we have to multiply it (not sure if it's quadruple, it's just what I'm using in my example. I think it's larger actually.) and THEN consider the limited power and size of the radio equipment and you can see why it'll take a long time to get back HD video. We gots TONS of data moving through a tiny interplanetary pipe And just because the process isn't slow enough, sometimes entire packets are lost (instead of bits being flipped.) so each packet is further buffered with enough information to rebuild parts of other packets. In the end, the file we get at the end of the pipe is much smaller than the data that was transmitted. Oh yeah, and let's not forget that like all planets, Mars rotates. This means that for days at a time, Curiosity is on the far side of the planet and we have no direct radio communication with it. We do have orbitals that help with this, but using them adds more time and overhead to the communications. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoot Posted August 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2012 Speaking of interplanetary pipes, wasn't one of the late founders of the 0 A.D. project an engineer on the Deep Space Network? I guess that's what's being used right now to get those flipping bits back from Mars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MishFTW Posted August 10, 2012 Report Share Posted August 10, 2012 The on board computer specs make me cringe... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gudo Posted August 10, 2012 Report Share Posted August 10, 2012 IIRC, that's because all of the hardware needed to be radiation hardened. Instead of using normal RAMM for instance, it uses specialized magnetic core memory. (Stuff looks so cool.) Since this stuff is a very specialized product, there's not much incentive for a company to improve on it's design. Therefore, none of the stunning advancements in miniaturization that consumer electronics have had. It's a similar story for the rest of the computer hardware in there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majapahit Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 Still expecting the orbital elevator And subspace sandwich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sighvatr Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 I thought those Black&White pictures were images of the Star Wars' Death Star at first.Speaking of mars, anybody ever play the original Red Faction? Great game. Looking at pictures of Mars makes me think of that game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoot Posted August 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 Cool piccy from Mars:This is the base of Mount Sharp, the 5.5 km high mountain which the Curiosity rover will be climbing over the next couple of years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feneur Posted August 27, 2012 Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 Really cool to see how "worn" it is Most other images I've seen have either been closeups or plain desert (which of course also is a sign of wear, but still not as obvious as this ). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoot Posted August 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 Really cool to see how "worn" it is Most other images I've seen have either been closeups or plain desert (which of course also is a sign of wear, but still not as obvious as this ).Indeed. For a planet that's supposed to be dead, there's still a lot going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.