Clodhopper
-
Posts
495 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Clodhopper
-
-
Why is that important?
-
kill him savagely. (hehe)
-
-
Man, you're right again.
Is right.
Oops, this isn't the right topic...
Goldy next
-
Man, it's funny to think about it.
-
Has a... ummm... questionable avvie...
-
-
Hahaha! How did you get mixed up with Rome?
-
I'll be doing chemistry.
-
-
Rught, SGE next
-
lettuce
-
Yeah, they're in camo to make it harder for firefighters to find them. jokes
-
Is naturally right...
-
Caesar89:
I think regardless of NK, a WWIII will definetely break out. Then a single world leader will rise up and proclaim world peace. A few other things will happen ,too, but that's for later.
EDIT: SGE: Not really, but can you find out on google?
-
That's where?
-
What? You live in in Rome?
-
In what language? French?
-
Thinking:
I believe the point is life is to improve everyday.Why? Why would you want to improve?
Because then I will feel fullfilledWhy would you want to feel fullfilled?
So as long as it makes you happy, you can do whatever you want?After all being happy is (at least mine) the prime target of one's life. -
over his family
-
-
No! SGE next.
-
Freezing
-
Well, thanks guys! And thanks for you're support in my winning!
The Geologic Column
in Hall of Intellectuals
Posted
dathui:
Whoa whoa whoa! We are disscussing evolution here.
dathui, the "basic things" that you use in your arguments are the very topics we are disscussing. If you claim there's evidence, but cannont provide it, there's really no point in arguing. We can go on and on about radiocarbon dating, 2nd law of Thermodynamics, and general evolutionist consinsus, but we won't get anywhere if we ignore the core issue. Evolution. Even if Radiocarbondating proved that the earth was 4-5 billion years old, so what? That doesn't prove evolution.
None of you can actually answer my question on the laws of logic. Why not?
I noticed that Mythos Ruler has told us that if there is evidence of a creator, than he will believe it. Klaas claimed that there was no evidence for a creator. In doing so, both of these debaters have ignored one of the most basic deductions of logic (which, according to their worldview, they cannot use anyway): all I need to do to prove something is to prove the impossibility of the contrary.
I'd like to thank everyone for taking their time to debate these past few days, including Tim, who made all this possible. I have learned a lot about debating and veiws on origins and evolution around here.