Jump to content

Itms

WFG Retired
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2.358

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    106

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Itms

  2. [FIXED] The SVN16011 error.

    in Bug reports

    Posted

    This was probably introduced in r15996. To avoid compilation errors, just right-click on the test project in visual studio and click on "Unload tests".

    We're working on the issue, but it's not our main concern either, so please be patient and avoid PMing people and upping your forum threads.

    Thanks in advance.

  5. [FIXED] The SVN16011 error.

    in Bug reports

    Posted

    Error 74 error C2039: 'test_unix_ExecutablePathname' : is not a member of 'TestSysdep' D:\10962\source\lib\sysdep\tests\test_sysdep.cpp 38

    Error 78 error C2039: 'test_unix_ExecutablePathname' : is not a member of TestSysdep' D:\trunk\source\lib\sysdep\tests\test_sysdep.cpp 38

    So what did you do exactly? :unknw:

  9. Can 0-AD hear my prayers ?!

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    Me warning auron about his tone doesn't mean you are allowed to say whatever mean thing crossing your mind about 0 A.D. players, Qwerty.
    Also, I really dislike when I read "I know I wasn't polite".

    Everyone here should try to think twice before posting, or we will lock this thread where interventions have been harsh since the beginning... Thanks for understanding, and please edit some posts above!

    • Like 3

  10. Can 0-AD hear my prayers ?!

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    auron, even if everyone and their cat voicing their opinion on the forum is tiring (maybe even exasperating!), it's not enough for being harsh with people as you just were (especially towards new community members). It's not the first time I read yell-ish and quite disrespectful posts from you, btw.

    Please calm down and edit your previous post, especially the last sentences.

    • Like 4

  11. Unit voices - Translations in Sanskrit

    in Game Development & Technical Discussion

    Posted

    Hello!

    I've been studying some bases of Sanskrit so that I can contribute to Mauryan voices. As a first step, here are the translations I made using the Monier-Williams English-Sanskrit Dictionary. Some grammatical mistakes might be present, so if anyone has some knowledge of Sanskrit they can voice their opinion.

    Some forms may be a bit long, so maybe it's better to change some strings (for instance, saying "Fisherman" instead of "I will fish" would probably be better).

    Thanks in advance!

    What is it? — kim asti? — किम् अस्ति?
    My lord? — svāmin? — स्वामिन्?
    I will walk — yāsyāmi — यास्यामि
    I will fight — yudhiṣyāmi — युधिष्यामि
    I will build — nirmmāsyāmi — निर्म्मास्यामि
    I will work land — kṣetram kariṣyāmi — क्षेत्रम् करिष्यामि
    I will gather together — cesyāmi — चेस्यामि
    I will herd — yūthaṣaḥ saṇganiṣyāmi — यूथषः सण्गनिष्यमि
    I will fish — matspān grahīsyāmi — मत्स्पान् ग्रहीस्यामि

    I will attack! — ākrāmisyāmi — आक्रामिस्यामि
    I will repair — pratisanādhāsyāmi — प्रतिसनाधास्यामि
    I will hunt — mṛgayisyāmi — मृगयिस्यामि
    I will heal — shamayisyāmi — शमयिस्यामि
    I will march! — yātrām kariṣyāmi — यात्राम् करिष्यामि
    I will retreat! — palāyisyāmi — पलायिस्यामि
    I will oversee — upadrakṣyāmi — उपद्रक्ष्यामि

    • Like 5

    Before Starting To Work On My Mod

    in Ancient Empires

    Posted · Edited by Itms

    I'd say, without hesitation, that you should keep citizen soldiers (they won't be removed from the main game, hopefully) and see how things turn out. It's not clear to me that there is an incompatibility between citizen-soldiers and differenciation by costs until I actually see it :P

    Edit: I'll answer to the poll to give you feedback, but expect conservative answers! :P

  14. Students interested in helping out

    in Applications and Contributions

    Posted

    There is a data structure we have to update and clean up, which is the spatial subdivision used by the range manager (for line-of-sight, fog-of-war, etc.). The relevant ticket is #2430.

    Even if a patch was proposed by wraitii, a member of the programming team, we still haven't taken any decision regarding it.

    Moreover, many data structures were modified by RedFox and the majority of these changes had to be amended for several reasons: optimization is necessary but must be done without introducing bugs, which is difficult. Maybe other data structures are in the same situation, but they don't come to my mind right now.

    I don't know to what extend you have to "make improvements" yourselves or if you can review, clean up and improve patches, but this topic is a central and complicated topic in the current state of the development and it would be interesting for you and great for us if you could make things move in this area!

    Thanks for your interest! :D

    Before Starting To Work On My Mod

    in Ancient Empires

    Posted

    Hi Prodigal Son!

    About giving ideas and feedback, I think it would be great, during the development of your mod, to find a way to share some changes, in order to include them in the main game. I don't know whether it would be a huge additionnal work for you to generate patches, but it would be too bad if your implementation of distinctions between civs was impossible to add to the main game.

    Good luck for this mod!

    • Like 3

  17. lag issues status

    in Game Development & Technical Discussion

    Posted

    Can you post an actual .patch file (and this time do it from the main folder instead of /sources)?

    Yes, but not only. This is, unfortunately, useless noise on the forums. Just create a Trac ticket describing what the patch should do. Attach the .patch file, following these instructions.

    However, you're only commenting out code. So, even if the code you remove is heavy and problematic, it does do something and removing it must lead to unexpected behaviour... Anyway, just move on to Trac and we'll see about that patch.

    Thanks in advance.

    • Like 2

  22. 0 A.D. Alpha 17 Quercus is now released!

    in Announcements / News

    Posted

    the new balancing is a step backward in my opinion.

    Maybe it's not my role to answer this because I've not been an active part of this rebalance, but the big idea is: we "violently balanced" the gameplay to remove any over/underpowered unit strategy. That's debatable because we also removed much depth along with these imbalances, but that way we have a sane base to improve on.

    This is still the balancing status of an Alpha release, in which we corrected "bugs" and regrettably introduced new ones, and we will do whatever possible to eventually fix them :)

    • Like 3

  24. Can 0-AD hear my prayers ?!

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    This is a really interesting wish-list I didn't read in detail because, eh, it's quite large :D

    But I encourage you to try the new Alpha which will be released in a few days, and which addresses a representative subset of the remarks above (as zzippy just said).

    Thanks a lot for your committed feedback!

  25. Feature Freeze Special Multiplayer Session

    in Announcements / News

    Posted

    hXuq7ag.jpg

    Hello everyone!

    As you may know, we're in the process of releasing the next alpha version of 0 A.D., Alpha XVII Quercus.

    Throughout several phases, we prepare the release to offer you a top quality, playable version with brand new features. For two weeks now, we've been in what we call the feature freeze. The idea is to stop adding new features, and focus on remaining bugs that could harm the players' experience.

    To spot bugs and fix them, we organized some Staff Multiplayer sessions the past weeks, but today, we'd like the entire community to lend us a hand and participate to this session! :D

    How to participate:

    This might be a bit tricky, but you'll have to install the development version of the game.

    You must follow the instructions that are given in this page: BuildInstructions.

    Windows users: you only have to follow these instructions, no need to compile the game and everything!

    Beware: This procedure is quite straightforward, but it can take much time, so prepare yourself in advance if you can...

    If you encounter problems, please post in this thread and we'll answer as soon as possible.

    We'll gather in the IRC channel #0ad (http://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=0ad) at 18:00GMT. Go to this page to know which hour it will be in your local timezone.

    Objective:

    For this session, we must verify some memory issues have been fixed. So the idea will be to organize large games, 3v3 or even 4v4. Individualist players, you're warned! ;)

    The principal objective is still to have fun together!

    We hope to see many of you tonight, to discover this preview and, hopefully, ensure we can release it really soon!

    Cheers :)

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...